Can the British Heart Foundation PocketCPR application improve the performance of chest compressions during bystander resuscitation: A randomised crossover manikin study

Georgette Eaton, John Renshaw, Pete Gregory, Tim Kilner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether the British Heart Foundation PocketCPR training application can improve the depth and rate of chest compression and therefore be confidently recommended for bystander use. A total of 118 candidates were recruited into a randomised crossover manikin trial. Each candidate performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation for 2 min without instruction or performed chest compressions using the PocketCPR application. Candidates then performed a further 2 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation within the opposite arm. The number of chest compressions performed improved when PocketCPR was used compared to chest compressions when it was not (44.28% vs 40.57%, p < 0.001). The number of chest compressions performed to the required depth was higher in the PocketCPR group (90.86 vs 66.26). The British Heart Foundation PocketCPR application improved the percentage of chest compressions that were performed to the required depth. Despite this, more work is required in order to develop a feedback device that can improve bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation without creating delay.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)14-23
Number of pages10
JournalHealth Informatics Journal
Volume24
Issue number1
Early online date11 Jul 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Manikins
Resuscitation
Cross-Over Studies
Thorax
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Arm
Equipment and Supplies

Bibliographical note

The full text is currently unavailable on the repository.

Keywords

  • assistive technologies
  • bystander
  • healthcare service innovation and information technology
  • mobile health
  • PocketCPR

Cite this

Can the British Heart Foundation PocketCPR application improve the performance of chest compressions during bystander resuscitation : A randomised crossover manikin study. / Eaton, Georgette; Renshaw, John; Gregory, Pete; Kilner, Tim.

In: Health Informatics Journal, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.03.2018, p. 14-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{310442abcc00415c921add4a6871b531,
title = "Can the British Heart Foundation PocketCPR application improve the performance of chest compressions during bystander resuscitation: A randomised crossover manikin study",
abstract = "This study aims to determine whether the British Heart Foundation PocketCPR training application can improve the depth and rate of chest compression and therefore be confidently recommended for bystander use. A total of 118 candidates were recruited into a randomised crossover manikin trial. Each candidate performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation for 2 min without instruction or performed chest compressions using the PocketCPR application. Candidates then performed a further 2 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation within the opposite arm. The number of chest compressions performed improved when PocketCPR was used compared to chest compressions when it was not (44.28{\%} vs 40.57{\%}, p < 0.001). The number of chest compressions performed to the required depth was higher in the PocketCPR group (90.86 vs 66.26). The British Heart Foundation PocketCPR application improved the percentage of chest compressions that were performed to the required depth. Despite this, more work is required in order to develop a feedback device that can improve bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation without creating delay.",
keywords = "assistive technologies, bystander, healthcare service innovation and information technology, mobile health, PocketCPR",
author = "Georgette Eaton and John Renshaw and Pete Gregory and Tim Kilner",
note = "The full text is currently unavailable on the repository.",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1460458216652645",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "14--23",
journal = "Health Informatics Journal",
issn = "1460-4582",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can the British Heart Foundation PocketCPR application improve the performance of chest compressions during bystander resuscitation

T2 - A randomised crossover manikin study

AU - Eaton, Georgette

AU - Renshaw, John

AU - Gregory, Pete

AU - Kilner, Tim

N1 - The full text is currently unavailable on the repository.

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - This study aims to determine whether the British Heart Foundation PocketCPR training application can improve the depth and rate of chest compression and therefore be confidently recommended for bystander use. A total of 118 candidates were recruited into a randomised crossover manikin trial. Each candidate performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation for 2 min without instruction or performed chest compressions using the PocketCPR application. Candidates then performed a further 2 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation within the opposite arm. The number of chest compressions performed improved when PocketCPR was used compared to chest compressions when it was not (44.28% vs 40.57%, p < 0.001). The number of chest compressions performed to the required depth was higher in the PocketCPR group (90.86 vs 66.26). The British Heart Foundation PocketCPR application improved the percentage of chest compressions that were performed to the required depth. Despite this, more work is required in order to develop a feedback device that can improve bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation without creating delay.

AB - This study aims to determine whether the British Heart Foundation PocketCPR training application can improve the depth and rate of chest compression and therefore be confidently recommended for bystander use. A total of 118 candidates were recruited into a randomised crossover manikin trial. Each candidate performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation for 2 min without instruction or performed chest compressions using the PocketCPR application. Candidates then performed a further 2 min of cardiopulmonary resuscitation within the opposite arm. The number of chest compressions performed improved when PocketCPR was used compared to chest compressions when it was not (44.28% vs 40.57%, p < 0.001). The number of chest compressions performed to the required depth was higher in the PocketCPR group (90.86 vs 66.26). The British Heart Foundation PocketCPR application improved the percentage of chest compressions that were performed to the required depth. Despite this, more work is required in order to develop a feedback device that can improve bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation without creating delay.

KW - assistive technologies

KW - bystander

KW - healthcare service innovation and information technology

KW - mobile health

KW - PocketCPR

U2 - 10.1177/1460458216652645

DO - 10.1177/1460458216652645

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 14

EP - 23

JO - Health Informatics Journal

JF - Health Informatics Journal

SN - 1460-4582

IS - 1

ER -