Abstract
This article uses a rhetorically informed thematic analysis to critically examine conservative arguments against same-sex marriage, as articulated in the British press at the time of a public consultation on marriage equality. Seven opposition arguments were identified: (1) marriage is by definition and tradition a union between a man and a woman; (2) marriage is designed as a framework for raising children; (3) if you allow gay marriage now, it will be polygamous and incestuous marriage next; (4) same-sex marriage would threaten the right to religious freedom; (5) same-sex couples already have equal rights; (6) changing the law to allow same-sex marriage would be undemocratic and (7) the government should focus on bigger priorities. Many of these arguments were a reworking of arguments previously used to oppose other forms of equality, although there was a notable absence of arguments explicitly based on assertions that homosexuality is immoral.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 37-55 |
| Journal | Feminism and Psychology |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Keywords
- rhetoric
- heterosexism
- equality
- lesbian and gay
- civil partnership
- same-sex marriage
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of ''But if you legalise same-sex marriage..': Arguments against marriage equality in the British press'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS