'But if you legalise same-sex marriage..': Arguments against marriage equality in the British press

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    12 Citations (Scopus)
    50 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This article uses a rhetorically informed thematic analysis to critically examine conservative arguments against same-sex marriage, as articulated in the British press at the time of a public consultation on marriage equality. Seven opposition arguments were identified: (1) marriage is by definition and tradition a union between a man and a woman; (2) marriage is designed as a framework for raising children; (3) if you allow gay marriage now, it will be polygamous and incestuous marriage next; (4) same-sex marriage would threaten the right to religious freedom; (5) same-sex couples already have equal rights; (6) changing the law to allow same-sex marriage would be undemocratic and (7) the government should focus on bigger priorities. Many of these arguments were a reworking of arguments previously used to oppose other forms of equality, although there was a notable absence of arguments explicitly based on assertions that homosexuality is immoral.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)37-55
    JournalFeminism and Psychology
    Volume24
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Marriage
    equality
    marriage
    religious freedom
    Equality
    British Press
    Same-sex Marriage
    Homosexuality
    homosexuality
    opposition
    Referral and Consultation
    Law

    Keywords

    • rhetoric
    • heterosexism
    • equality
    • lesbian and gay
    • civil partnership
    • same-sex marriage

    Cite this

    'But if you legalise same-sex marriage..': Arguments against marriage equality in the British press. / Jowett, Adam.

    In: Feminism and Psychology, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2014, p. 37-55.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{f2551f087b9e474a9de8c3a20129d1d6,
    title = "'But if you legalise same-sex marriage..': Arguments against marriage equality in the British press",
    abstract = "This article uses a rhetorically informed thematic analysis to critically examine conservative arguments against same-sex marriage, as articulated in the British press at the time of a public consultation on marriage equality. Seven opposition arguments were identified: (1) marriage is by definition and tradition a union between a man and a woman; (2) marriage is designed as a framework for raising children; (3) if you allow gay marriage now, it will be polygamous and incestuous marriage next; (4) same-sex marriage would threaten the right to religious freedom; (5) same-sex couples already have equal rights; (6) changing the law to allow same-sex marriage would be undemocratic and (7) the government should focus on bigger priorities. Many of these arguments were a reworking of arguments previously used to oppose other forms of equality, although there was a notable absence of arguments explicitly based on assertions that homosexuality is immoral.",
    keywords = "rhetoric, heterosexism, equality, lesbian and gay, civil partnership, same-sex marriage",
    author = "Adam Jowett",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1177/0959353513510655",
    language = "English",
    volume = "24",
    pages = "37--55",
    journal = "Feminism & Psychology",
    issn = "0959-3535",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - 'But if you legalise same-sex marriage..': Arguments against marriage equality in the British press

    AU - Jowett, Adam

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - This article uses a rhetorically informed thematic analysis to critically examine conservative arguments against same-sex marriage, as articulated in the British press at the time of a public consultation on marriage equality. Seven opposition arguments were identified: (1) marriage is by definition and tradition a union between a man and a woman; (2) marriage is designed as a framework for raising children; (3) if you allow gay marriage now, it will be polygamous and incestuous marriage next; (4) same-sex marriage would threaten the right to religious freedom; (5) same-sex couples already have equal rights; (6) changing the law to allow same-sex marriage would be undemocratic and (7) the government should focus on bigger priorities. Many of these arguments were a reworking of arguments previously used to oppose other forms of equality, although there was a notable absence of arguments explicitly based on assertions that homosexuality is immoral.

    AB - This article uses a rhetorically informed thematic analysis to critically examine conservative arguments against same-sex marriage, as articulated in the British press at the time of a public consultation on marriage equality. Seven opposition arguments were identified: (1) marriage is by definition and tradition a union between a man and a woman; (2) marriage is designed as a framework for raising children; (3) if you allow gay marriage now, it will be polygamous and incestuous marriage next; (4) same-sex marriage would threaten the right to religious freedom; (5) same-sex couples already have equal rights; (6) changing the law to allow same-sex marriage would be undemocratic and (7) the government should focus on bigger priorities. Many of these arguments were a reworking of arguments previously used to oppose other forms of equality, although there was a notable absence of arguments explicitly based on assertions that homosexuality is immoral.

    KW - rhetoric

    KW - heterosexism

    KW - equality

    KW - lesbian and gay

    KW - civil partnership

    KW - same-sex marriage

    U2 - 10.1177/0959353513510655

    DO - 10.1177/0959353513510655

    M3 - Article

    VL - 24

    SP - 37

    EP - 55

    JO - Feminism & Psychology

    JF - Feminism & Psychology

    SN - 0959-3535

    IS - 1

    ER -