Business school rankings: Content and context

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - This paper sets out to examine the affect of rankings on business schools from the perspective of a business school director. Design/methodology/approach - The paper critiques the methodologies of ranking systems, their statistical validity, the factors used, and the weightings given to them. Findings - Rankings are significant drivers of a school's reputation. Good performance can double inquiries and applications and allow schools to charge prestige premiums. Financial Times top decile MBA programmes charge, on average, just below $80,000 for an MBA. Bottom decile schools charge only $37,000. Originality/value - This paper finds that it is impossible to challenge the criteria set out by a variety of rankings organisations and it is ill-advised to boycott rankings. Schools are advised to consider which criteria reflect areas needing improvement and to continue "playing the game".

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)49-53
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Management Development
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ranking
Business schools
Business Schools
Charge
Methodology
Design methodology
Weighting
Prestige
Boycott
MBA program
Factors
Premium
Originality

Keywords

  • Business schools
  • Measurement characteristics
  • Performance measures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • History

Cite this

Business school rankings : Content and context. / Peters, Kai.

In: Journal of Management Development, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2007, p. 49-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{7c86f00e60134c8a86cd16aefc5d2be7,
title = "Business school rankings: Content and context",
abstract = "Purpose - This paper sets out to examine the affect of rankings on business schools from the perspective of a business school director. Design/methodology/approach - The paper critiques the methodologies of ranking systems, their statistical validity, the factors used, and the weightings given to them. Findings - Rankings are significant drivers of a school's reputation. Good performance can double inquiries and applications and allow schools to charge prestige premiums. Financial Times top decile MBA programmes charge, on average, just below $80,000 for an MBA. Bottom decile schools charge only $37,000. Originality/value - This paper finds that it is impossible to challenge the criteria set out by a variety of rankings organisations and it is ill-advised to boycott rankings. Schools are advised to consider which criteria reflect areas needing improvement and to continue {"}playing the game{"}.",
keywords = "Business schools, Measurement characteristics, Performance measures",
author = "Kai Peters",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1108/02621710710720086",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "49--53",
journal = "Journal of Management Development",
issn = "0262-1711",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Business school rankings

T2 - Content and context

AU - Peters, Kai

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Purpose - This paper sets out to examine the affect of rankings on business schools from the perspective of a business school director. Design/methodology/approach - The paper critiques the methodologies of ranking systems, their statistical validity, the factors used, and the weightings given to them. Findings - Rankings are significant drivers of a school's reputation. Good performance can double inquiries and applications and allow schools to charge prestige premiums. Financial Times top decile MBA programmes charge, on average, just below $80,000 for an MBA. Bottom decile schools charge only $37,000. Originality/value - This paper finds that it is impossible to challenge the criteria set out by a variety of rankings organisations and it is ill-advised to boycott rankings. Schools are advised to consider which criteria reflect areas needing improvement and to continue "playing the game".

AB - Purpose - This paper sets out to examine the affect of rankings on business schools from the perspective of a business school director. Design/methodology/approach - The paper critiques the methodologies of ranking systems, their statistical validity, the factors used, and the weightings given to them. Findings - Rankings are significant drivers of a school's reputation. Good performance can double inquiries and applications and allow schools to charge prestige premiums. Financial Times top decile MBA programmes charge, on average, just below $80,000 for an MBA. Bottom decile schools charge only $37,000. Originality/value - This paper finds that it is impossible to challenge the criteria set out by a variety of rankings organisations and it is ill-advised to boycott rankings. Schools are advised to consider which criteria reflect areas needing improvement and to continue "playing the game".

KW - Business schools

KW - Measurement characteristics

KW - Performance measures

U2 - 10.1108/02621710710720086

DO - 10.1108/02621710710720086

M3 - Review article

VL - 26

SP - 49

EP - 53

JO - Journal of Management Development

JF - Journal of Management Development

SN - 0262-1711

IS - 1

ER -