Building the Concept of Research Impact Literacy

Julie Bayley, David Phipps

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    141 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Impact is an increasingly significant part of academia internationally both in centralised assessment processes (eg. UK) and funder drives towards knowledge mobilisation (eg. Canada) Narrowly focused assessment or institutional ranking approaches can obscure the benefits of brokering research into practice. It is vital that academics, non-academic stakeholders and research managers alike fully comprehend how to generate and demonstrate impact. Derived directly from UK and Canadian experiences of supporting impact and knowledge mobilisation, this paper introduces the original concept of impact literacy. Implications of poor impact literacy for the successful mobilisation of research are discussed alongside requirements for associated skill development.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)597-606
    JournalEvidence and Policy
    Volume15
    Issue number4
    Early online date11 Sep 2017
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2019

    Fingerprint

    impact research
    literacy
    mobilization
    ranking
    stakeholder
    Canada
    manager
    experience

    Keywords

    • impact literacy
    • knowledge mobilisation
    • practitioners
    • research impact

    Cite this

    Building the Concept of Research Impact Literacy. / Bayley, Julie; Phipps, David.

    In: Evidence and Policy, Vol. 15, No. 4, 11.2019, p. 597-606.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Bayley, Julie ; Phipps, David. / Building the Concept of Research Impact Literacy. In: Evidence and Policy. 2019 ; Vol. 15, No. 4. pp. 597-606.
    @article{b61bd1f1b99c4678845b05bc3f722b92,
    title = "Building the Concept of Research Impact Literacy",
    abstract = "Impact is an increasingly significant part of academia internationally both in centralised assessment processes (eg. UK) and funder drives towards knowledge mobilisation (eg. Canada) Narrowly focused assessment or institutional ranking approaches can obscure the benefits of brokering research into practice. It is vital that academics, non-academic stakeholders and research managers alike fully comprehend how to generate and demonstrate impact. Derived directly from UK and Canadian experiences of supporting impact and knowledge mobilisation, this paper introduces the original concept of impact literacy. Implications of poor impact literacy for the successful mobilisation of research are discussed alongside requirements for associated skill development.",
    keywords = "impact literacy, knowledge mobilisation, practitioners, research impact",
    author = "Julie Bayley and David Phipps",
    year = "2019",
    month = "11",
    doi = "10.1332/174426417X15034894876108",
    language = "English",
    volume = "15",
    pages = "597--606",
    journal = "Evidence and Policy",
    issn = "1744-2648",
    publisher = "Policy Press",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Building the Concept of Research Impact Literacy

    AU - Bayley, Julie

    AU - Phipps, David

    PY - 2019/11

    Y1 - 2019/11

    N2 - Impact is an increasingly significant part of academia internationally both in centralised assessment processes (eg. UK) and funder drives towards knowledge mobilisation (eg. Canada) Narrowly focused assessment or institutional ranking approaches can obscure the benefits of brokering research into practice. It is vital that academics, non-academic stakeholders and research managers alike fully comprehend how to generate and demonstrate impact. Derived directly from UK and Canadian experiences of supporting impact and knowledge mobilisation, this paper introduces the original concept of impact literacy. Implications of poor impact literacy for the successful mobilisation of research are discussed alongside requirements for associated skill development.

    AB - Impact is an increasingly significant part of academia internationally both in centralised assessment processes (eg. UK) and funder drives towards knowledge mobilisation (eg. Canada) Narrowly focused assessment or institutional ranking approaches can obscure the benefits of brokering research into practice. It is vital that academics, non-academic stakeholders and research managers alike fully comprehend how to generate and demonstrate impact. Derived directly from UK and Canadian experiences of supporting impact and knowledge mobilisation, this paper introduces the original concept of impact literacy. Implications of poor impact literacy for the successful mobilisation of research are discussed alongside requirements for associated skill development.

    KW - impact literacy

    KW - knowledge mobilisation

    KW - practitioners

    KW - research impact

    U2 - 10.1332/174426417X15034894876108

    DO - 10.1332/174426417X15034894876108

    M3 - Article

    VL - 15

    SP - 597

    EP - 606

    JO - Evidence and Policy

    JF - Evidence and Policy

    SN - 1744-2648

    IS - 4

    ER -