British Home Stores Collapse: The Case for an Employee Derivative Claim

Neshat Safari, Martin Gelter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

British Home Stores collapsed led 11,000 employees to lose their jobs and faced substantial cuts to their pension with a £571 million pension deficit. In light of the BHS scandal, the UK Government has proposed a set of corporate governance reforms to strengthen the employee voice. Although the government’s approach towards strengthening the employees’ protection is well intentioned, we argue that without providing a derivative claim right for employees, these measures will likely have little impact in practice. Hence we suggest that to safeguard the employees’ interest in the company and to enhance the overall protection of the company, in addition to the current proposed reforms, the standing for bringing derivative claims should be broadened to the employee’s representative.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-68
JournalJournal of Corporate Law Studies
Volume19
Issue number1
Early online date7 Sep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'British Home Stores Collapse: The Case for an Employee Derivative Claim'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this