Body extension and the law: medical devices, intellectual property, prosthetics and marginalisation (again)

Abbe Brown, Shawn Harmon, Rory O’Connor, Sita Popat, Sarah Whatley

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

Abstract

This interdisciplinary paper, drawing on empirical and doctrinal research regarding artificial limbs and digital avatars, analyses two concepts which are argued to be core to the person – integrity and identity. From the perspective of a person who is a prosthetic user, the paper then evaluates the extent to which two legal regimes which are highly relevant to prosthetics, medical devices regulation (and its delivery) and intellectual property (and its power), engage with the person, integrity and identity with a focus on approaches taken to authority and control. The paper criticises the meaning which law generates regarding the person. It calls for new approaches to be taken by the legal regimes explored to the person, identity and integrity; and for a new multifaceted interdisciplinary driven approach to the person.

Original languageEnglish
Pages161-184
Number of pages24
Volume10
No.2
Specialist publicationLaw, Innovation and Technology
PublisherTaylor & Francis
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

intellectual property
human being
Law
integrity
regulation

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in
Law, Innovation and Technology
on 27th September 2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17579961.2018.1526853

Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

Keywords

  • Person
  • integrity
  • Identity
  • intellectual property
  • medical devices

Cite this

Body extension and the law: medical devices, intellectual property, prosthetics and marginalisation (again). / Brown, Abbe; Harmon, Shawn; O’Connor, Rory; Popat, Sita; Whatley, Sarah.

In: Law, Innovation and Technology, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2018, p. 161-184.

Research output: Contribution to specialist publicationArticle

Brown, Abbe ; Harmon, Shawn ; O’Connor, Rory ; Popat, Sita ; Whatley, Sarah. / Body extension and the law: medical devices, intellectual property, prosthetics and marginalisation (again). In: Law, Innovation and Technology. 2018 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 161-184.
@misc{f9f98688a03a49f29f83fd555f3bb67c,
title = "Body extension and the law: medical devices, intellectual property, prosthetics and marginalisation (again)",
abstract = "This interdisciplinary paper, drawing on empirical and doctrinal research regarding artificial limbs and digital avatars, analyses two concepts which are argued to be core to the person – integrity and identity. From the perspective of a person who is a prosthetic user, the paper then evaluates the extent to which two legal regimes which are highly relevant to prosthetics, medical devices regulation (and its delivery) and intellectual property (and its power), engage with the person, integrity and identity with a focus on approaches taken to authority and control. The paper criticises the meaning which law generates regarding the person. It calls for new approaches to be taken by the legal regimes explored to the person, identity and integrity; and for a new multifaceted interdisciplinary driven approach to the person.",
keywords = "Person, integrity, Identity, intellectual property, medical devices",
author = "Abbe Brown and Shawn Harmon and Rory O’Connor and Sita Popat and Sarah Whatley",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Law, Innovation and Technology on 27th September 2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17579961.2018.1526853 Copyright {\circledC} and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/17579961.2018.1526853",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "161--184",
journal = "Law, Innovation and Technology",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Body extension and the law: medical devices, intellectual property, prosthetics and marginalisation (again)

AU - Brown, Abbe

AU - Harmon, Shawn

AU - O’Connor, Rory

AU - Popat, Sita

AU - Whatley, Sarah

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Law, Innovation and Technology on 27th September 2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17579961.2018.1526853 Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This interdisciplinary paper, drawing on empirical and doctrinal research regarding artificial limbs and digital avatars, analyses two concepts which are argued to be core to the person – integrity and identity. From the perspective of a person who is a prosthetic user, the paper then evaluates the extent to which two legal regimes which are highly relevant to prosthetics, medical devices regulation (and its delivery) and intellectual property (and its power), engage with the person, integrity and identity with a focus on approaches taken to authority and control. The paper criticises the meaning which law generates regarding the person. It calls for new approaches to be taken by the legal regimes explored to the person, identity and integrity; and for a new multifaceted interdisciplinary driven approach to the person.

AB - This interdisciplinary paper, drawing on empirical and doctrinal research regarding artificial limbs and digital avatars, analyses two concepts which are argued to be core to the person – integrity and identity. From the perspective of a person who is a prosthetic user, the paper then evaluates the extent to which two legal regimes which are highly relevant to prosthetics, medical devices regulation (and its delivery) and intellectual property (and its power), engage with the person, integrity and identity with a focus on approaches taken to authority and control. The paper criticises the meaning which law generates regarding the person. It calls for new approaches to be taken by the legal regimes explored to the person, identity and integrity; and for a new multifaceted interdisciplinary driven approach to the person.

KW - Person

KW - integrity

KW - Identity

KW - intellectual property

KW - medical devices

U2 - 10.1080/17579961.2018.1526853

DO - 10.1080/17579961.2018.1526853

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 161

EP - 184

JO - Law, Innovation and Technology

JF - Law, Innovation and Technology

PB - Taylor & Francis

ER -