Blended foods for tube-fed children: A safe and realistic option? A rapid review of the evidence

Jane Coad, Alexander Toft, Susie Lapwood, Joseph Manning, Mark Hunter, Huw Jenkins, Clare Sadlier, Julie Hammonds, Ailsa Kennedy, Simon Murch, David Widdas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)
631 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

With the growing number of children and young people with complex care needs or life-limiting conditions, alternative routes for nutrition have been established (such as gastrostomy feeding). The conditions of children and young people who require such feeding are diverse but could relate to problems with swallowing (dysphagia), digestive disorders or neurological/muscular disorders. However, the use of a blended diet as an alternative to prescribed formula feeds for children fed via a gastrostomy is a contentious issue for clinicians and researchers. From a rapid review of the literature, we identify that current evidence falls into three categories: (1) those who feel that the use of a blended diet is unsafe and substandard; (2) those who see benefits of such a diet as an alternative in particular circumstances (eg, to reduce constipation) and (3) those who see merit in the blended diet but are cautious to proclaim potential benefits due to the lack of clinical research. There may be some benefits to using blended diets, although concerns around safety, nutrition and practical issues remain.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)274-278
Number of pages5
JournalArchives of Disease in Childhood
Volume102
Issue number3
Early online date18 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

Diet
Food
Gastrostomy
Constipation
Deglutition
Deglutition Disorders
Nervous System Diseases
Research Personnel
Safety
Research

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2016 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

Keywords

  • Blended Diet
  • gastrostomy
  • children
  • young people
  • enteral
  • rapid review.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Blended foods for tube-fed children : A safe and realistic option? A rapid review of the evidence. / Coad, Jane; Toft, Alexander; Lapwood, Susie; Manning, Joseph; Hunter, Mark; Jenkins, Huw; Sadlier, Clare; Hammonds, Julie; Kennedy, Ailsa; Murch, Simon; Widdas, David.

In: Archives of Disease in Childhood, Vol. 102, No. 3, 01.03.2017, p. 274-278.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coad, J, Toft, A, Lapwood, S, Manning, J, Hunter, M, Jenkins, H, Sadlier, C, Hammonds, J, Kennedy, A, Murch, S & Widdas, D 2017, 'Blended foods for tube-fed children: A safe and realistic option? A rapid review of the evidence' Archives of Disease in Childhood, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 274-278. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2016-311030
Coad, Jane ; Toft, Alexander ; Lapwood, Susie ; Manning, Joseph ; Hunter, Mark ; Jenkins, Huw ; Sadlier, Clare ; Hammonds, Julie ; Kennedy, Ailsa ; Murch, Simon ; Widdas, David. / Blended foods for tube-fed children : A safe and realistic option? A rapid review of the evidence. In: Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2017 ; Vol. 102, No. 3. pp. 274-278.
@article{fe9b438e119e49119c128b8939d2ccfd,
title = "Blended foods for tube-fed children: A safe and realistic option? A rapid review of the evidence",
abstract = "With the growing number of children and young people with complex care needs or life-limiting conditions, alternative routes for nutrition have been established (such as gastrostomy feeding). The conditions of children and young people who require such feeding are diverse but could relate to problems with swallowing (dysphagia), digestive disorders or neurological/muscular disorders. However, the use of a blended diet as an alternative to prescribed formula feeds for children fed via a gastrostomy is a contentious issue for clinicians and researchers. From a rapid review of the literature, we identify that current evidence falls into three categories: (1) those who feel that the use of a blended diet is unsafe and substandard; (2) those who see benefits of such a diet as an alternative in particular circumstances (eg, to reduce constipation) and (3) those who see merit in the blended diet but are cautious to proclaim potential benefits due to the lack of clinical research. There may be some benefits to using blended diets, although concerns around safety, nutrition and practical issues remain.",
keywords = "Blended Diet, gastrostomy, children, young people, enteral, rapid review.",
author = "Jane Coad and Alexander Toft and Susie Lapwood and Joseph Manning and Mark Hunter and Huw Jenkins and Clare Sadlier and Julie Hammonds and Ailsa Kennedy and Simon Murch and David Widdas",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2016 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/archdischild-2016-311030",
language = "English",
volume = "102",
pages = "274--278",
journal = "Archives of Disease in Childhood",
issn = "0003-9888",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Blended foods for tube-fed children

T2 - A safe and realistic option? A rapid review of the evidence

AU - Coad, Jane

AU - Toft, Alexander

AU - Lapwood, Susie

AU - Manning, Joseph

AU - Hunter, Mark

AU - Jenkins, Huw

AU - Sadlier, Clare

AU - Hammonds, Julie

AU - Kennedy, Ailsa

AU - Murch, Simon

AU - Widdas, David

N1 - Copyright © 2016 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - With the growing number of children and young people with complex care needs or life-limiting conditions, alternative routes for nutrition have been established (such as gastrostomy feeding). The conditions of children and young people who require such feeding are diverse but could relate to problems with swallowing (dysphagia), digestive disorders or neurological/muscular disorders. However, the use of a blended diet as an alternative to prescribed formula feeds for children fed via a gastrostomy is a contentious issue for clinicians and researchers. From a rapid review of the literature, we identify that current evidence falls into three categories: (1) those who feel that the use of a blended diet is unsafe and substandard; (2) those who see benefits of such a diet as an alternative in particular circumstances (eg, to reduce constipation) and (3) those who see merit in the blended diet but are cautious to proclaim potential benefits due to the lack of clinical research. There may be some benefits to using blended diets, although concerns around safety, nutrition and practical issues remain.

AB - With the growing number of children and young people with complex care needs or life-limiting conditions, alternative routes for nutrition have been established (such as gastrostomy feeding). The conditions of children and young people who require such feeding are diverse but could relate to problems with swallowing (dysphagia), digestive disorders or neurological/muscular disorders. However, the use of a blended diet as an alternative to prescribed formula feeds for children fed via a gastrostomy is a contentious issue for clinicians and researchers. From a rapid review of the literature, we identify that current evidence falls into three categories: (1) those who feel that the use of a blended diet is unsafe and substandard; (2) those who see benefits of such a diet as an alternative in particular circumstances (eg, to reduce constipation) and (3) those who see merit in the blended diet but are cautious to proclaim potential benefits due to the lack of clinical research. There may be some benefits to using blended diets, although concerns around safety, nutrition and practical issues remain.

KW - Blended Diet

KW - gastrostomy

KW - children

KW - young people

KW - enteral

KW - rapid review.

U2 - 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311030

DO - 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311030

M3 - Article

VL - 102

SP - 274

EP - 278

JO - Archives of Disease in Childhood

JF - Archives of Disease in Childhood

SN - 0003-9888

IS - 3

ER -