Biosecurity, expertise and the institutional void: The case of bovine tuberculosis

Gareth Enticott, Alex Franklin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores the links between biosecurity policy and rural differentiation. It attempts to show how biosecurity policy has been fundamentally affected by uncertainty over the rules of the game of policy-making - what Hajer has called the 'institutional void'. In particular, the article attempts to show how this void has created a new political space in which the traditional practices of dealing with animal disease have been challenged and reshaped. Crucial to this is a discourse of partnership that permits new actors and forms of expertise to construct different approaches to biosecurity at new spatial scales. These actions legitimate a new spatiality of disease control, thereby contributing to the differentiation of the countryside. The article uses a case-study of policy attempts to control the spread of bovine tuberculosis in England and Wales.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)375-393
Number of pages19
JournalSociologia Ruralis
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

contagious disease
expertise
Disease
animal
uncertainty
discourse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Biosecurity, expertise and the institutional void : The case of bovine tuberculosis. / Enticott, Gareth; Franklin, Alex.

In: Sociologia Ruralis, Vol. 49, No. 4, 01.10.2009, p. 375-393.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{13ceacf0f35a4fa786626c7b309a0867,
title = "Biosecurity, expertise and the institutional void: The case of bovine tuberculosis",
abstract = "This article explores the links between biosecurity policy and rural differentiation. It attempts to show how biosecurity policy has been fundamentally affected by uncertainty over the rules of the game of policy-making - what Hajer has called the 'institutional void'. In particular, the article attempts to show how this void has created a new political space in which the traditional practices of dealing with animal disease have been challenged and reshaped. Crucial to this is a discourse of partnership that permits new actors and forms of expertise to construct different approaches to biosecurity at new spatial scales. These actions legitimate a new spatiality of disease control, thereby contributing to the differentiation of the countryside. The article uses a case-study of policy attempts to control the spread of bovine tuberculosis in England and Wales.",
author = "Gareth Enticott and Alex Franklin",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00496.x",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "375--393",
journal = "Sociologia Ruralis",
issn = "0038-0199",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biosecurity, expertise and the institutional void

T2 - The case of bovine tuberculosis

AU - Enticott, Gareth

AU - Franklin, Alex

PY - 2009/10/1

Y1 - 2009/10/1

N2 - This article explores the links between biosecurity policy and rural differentiation. It attempts to show how biosecurity policy has been fundamentally affected by uncertainty over the rules of the game of policy-making - what Hajer has called the 'institutional void'. In particular, the article attempts to show how this void has created a new political space in which the traditional practices of dealing with animal disease have been challenged and reshaped. Crucial to this is a discourse of partnership that permits new actors and forms of expertise to construct different approaches to biosecurity at new spatial scales. These actions legitimate a new spatiality of disease control, thereby contributing to the differentiation of the countryside. The article uses a case-study of policy attempts to control the spread of bovine tuberculosis in England and Wales.

AB - This article explores the links between biosecurity policy and rural differentiation. It attempts to show how biosecurity policy has been fundamentally affected by uncertainty over the rules of the game of policy-making - what Hajer has called the 'institutional void'. In particular, the article attempts to show how this void has created a new political space in which the traditional practices of dealing with animal disease have been challenged and reshaped. Crucial to this is a discourse of partnership that permits new actors and forms of expertise to construct different approaches to biosecurity at new spatial scales. These actions legitimate a new spatiality of disease control, thereby contributing to the differentiation of the countryside. The article uses a case-study of policy attempts to control the spread of bovine tuberculosis in England and Wales.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350106754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00496.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00496.x

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 375

EP - 393

JO - Sociologia Ruralis

JF - Sociologia Ruralis

SN - 0038-0199

IS - 4

ER -