Beyond the Berlin Wall?: Investigating joint commissioning and its various meanings using a Q methodology approach

H. Dickinson, S. Jeffares, Alyson Nicholds, J. Glasby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Joint commissioning has been extensively alluded to in English health and social care policy as a way of improving services and outcomes. Yet there is a lack of specificity pertaining to what joint commissioning actually is and what success would look like. In this paper we adopt a Q methodology approach to understand the different meanings of joint commissioning that those involved in these arrangements hold. In doing so we get beyond the more orthodox interpretations of joint commissioning found in the literature although the appeal of joint commissioning as a ‘good thing’ is still prominent across these accounts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)830-851
JournalPublic Management Review
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Jan 2013

Bibliographical note

The full text is not available on the repository.

Keywords

  • Joint commissioning
  • Q methodology
  • collaboration
  • meaning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Beyond the Berlin Wall?: Investigating joint commissioning and its various meanings using a Q methodology approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this