Barriers at the Ballot Box: The (In)accessibility of UK Polling Stations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The United Kingdom has a long and complex history in matters of electoral law and voting rights. Much of the current electoral legal framework and the voting process itself remains somewhat antiquated when compared with other liberal democracies. The infrastructure and the procedures used to facilitate voting in polling stations are, to some extent, no exception. In the present case, the failure to provide an adequate device to assist blind and partially sighted voters in polling stations to allow them to vote without assistance from a polling station worker or a companion and in secret was challenged. Although the High Court ruled for the claimant, the dispute should be considered in the broader context of polling station accessibility. Unfortunately, the barriers faced by some voters with disabilities remains deeply problematic in the face of the UK’s human rights obligations and the most basic duty of any democracy to facilitate voting and participation in the electoral process.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-92
Number of pages6
JournalCoventry Law Journal
Volume24
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 8 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

voting
electoral law
democracy
obligation
voter
human rights
assistance
disability
infrastructure
worker
participation
history

Bibliographical note

Accepted for publication on 6 June 2019.
Published on 8 July 2019.
There is no online link to provide. Content is available via Westlaw.

Keywords

  • Ballot papers
  • Disability discrimination
  • Reasonable adjustments
  • Visual impairment
  • Visually impaired persons
  • Voting in person

Cite this

Barriers at the Ballot Box: The (In)accessibility of UK Polling Stations. / Stanford, Ben.

In: Coventry Law Journal, Vol. 24, No. 1, 08.07.2019, p. 87-92.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1784159349f446aab33ee053798957eb,
title = "Barriers at the Ballot Box: The (In)accessibility of UK Polling Stations",
abstract = "The United Kingdom has a long and complex history in matters of electoral law and voting rights. Much of the current electoral legal framework and the voting process itself remains somewhat antiquated when compared with other liberal democracies. The infrastructure and the procedures used to facilitate voting in polling stations are, to some extent, no exception. In the present case, the failure to provide an adequate device to assist blind and partially sighted voters in polling stations to allow them to vote without assistance from a polling station worker or a companion and in secret was challenged. Although the High Court ruled for the claimant, the dispute should be considered in the broader context of polling station accessibility. Unfortunately, the barriers faced by some voters with disabilities remains deeply problematic in the face of the UK’s human rights obligations and the most basic duty of any democracy to facilitate voting and participation in the electoral process.",
keywords = "Ballot papers, Disability discrimination, Reasonable adjustments, Visual impairment, Visually impaired persons, Voting in person",
author = "Ben Stanford",
note = "Accepted for publication on 6 June 2019. Published on 8 July 2019. There is no online link to provide. Content is available via Westlaw.",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "8",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "87--92",
journal = "Law Journal",
issn = "1758-2512",
publisher = "Coventry University Law School",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers at the Ballot Box: The (In)accessibility of UK Polling Stations

AU - Stanford, Ben

N1 - Accepted for publication on 6 June 2019. Published on 8 July 2019. There is no online link to provide. Content is available via Westlaw.

PY - 2019/7/8

Y1 - 2019/7/8

N2 - The United Kingdom has a long and complex history in matters of electoral law and voting rights. Much of the current electoral legal framework and the voting process itself remains somewhat antiquated when compared with other liberal democracies. The infrastructure and the procedures used to facilitate voting in polling stations are, to some extent, no exception. In the present case, the failure to provide an adequate device to assist blind and partially sighted voters in polling stations to allow them to vote without assistance from a polling station worker or a companion and in secret was challenged. Although the High Court ruled for the claimant, the dispute should be considered in the broader context of polling station accessibility. Unfortunately, the barriers faced by some voters with disabilities remains deeply problematic in the face of the UK’s human rights obligations and the most basic duty of any democracy to facilitate voting and participation in the electoral process.

AB - The United Kingdom has a long and complex history in matters of electoral law and voting rights. Much of the current electoral legal framework and the voting process itself remains somewhat antiquated when compared with other liberal democracies. The infrastructure and the procedures used to facilitate voting in polling stations are, to some extent, no exception. In the present case, the failure to provide an adequate device to assist blind and partially sighted voters in polling stations to allow them to vote without assistance from a polling station worker or a companion and in secret was challenged. Although the High Court ruled for the claimant, the dispute should be considered in the broader context of polling station accessibility. Unfortunately, the barriers faced by some voters with disabilities remains deeply problematic in the face of the UK’s human rights obligations and the most basic duty of any democracy to facilitate voting and participation in the electoral process.

KW - Ballot papers

KW - Disability discrimination

KW - Reasonable adjustments

KW - Visual impairment

KW - Visually impaired persons

KW - Voting in person

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 87

EP - 92

JO - Law Journal

JF - Law Journal

SN - 1758-2512

IS - 1

ER -