Barrel swirl behaviour in a four-valve engine with pentroof chamber

A. Newman, N. Girgis, Stephen F. Benjamin, P. Baker

Research output: Book/ReportOther report

16 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to characterise barrel swirl behaviour in a production four-valve engine with pentroof chamber. Steady flow analysis showed that the insertion of tubes into the cylinder head's induction tracts increased the tumbling ratio of the in-cylinder flow field at intake valve closure. A comparison of LDA measurements, conducted along the spark plug axis, for tubes and no tubes inserted yielded the following conclusions. The results indicated that the barrel swirl generated was not efficiently breaking down into turbulence but forming two counter-rotating vortices in the horizontal cylinder plane. The turbulence levels and cycle-to-cycle flow variations towards the end of the compression stroke increased with tumbling ratio. The former suggested faster combustion rates if applied to a lean burn engine, however, the latter suggested greater cyclic combustion instability and may limit lean burn capability. Both the rotational sense of the vortices and their cyclic stability appeared to be sensitive to tumbling ratio. Publisher statement: Copyright © 1995 SAE International. This paper is posted on this site with permission from SAE International and is for viewing only. It may not be stored on any additional repositories or retrieval systems. Further use or distribution is not permitted without permission from SAE.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherSAE
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1995

Publication series

NameSAE Technical Papers
PublisherSAE

Fingerprint

Barreling
Engine cylinders
Engines
Vortex flow
Turbulence
Intake valves
Spark plugs
Cylinder heads
Steady flow
Flow fields

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 1995 SAE International. This paper is posted on this site with permission from SAE International and is for viewing only. It may not be stored on any additional repositories or retrieval systems. Further use or distribution is not permitted without permission from SAE.

Keywords

  • automotive
  • lean burn engines
  • spark ignition gasoline engines
  • data acquisition

Cite this

Newman, A., Girgis, N., Benjamin, S. F., & Baker, P. (1995). Barrel swirl behaviour in a four-valve engine with pentroof chamber. (SAE Technical Papers). SAE. https://doi.org/10.4271/950730

Barrel swirl behaviour in a four-valve engine with pentroof chamber. / Newman, A.; Girgis, N.; Benjamin, Stephen F.; Baker, P.

SAE, 1995. (SAE Technical Papers).

Research output: Book/ReportOther report

Newman, A, Girgis, N, Benjamin, SF & Baker, P 1995, Barrel swirl behaviour in a four-valve engine with pentroof chamber. SAE Technical Papers, SAE. https://doi.org/10.4271/950730
Newman A, Girgis N, Benjamin SF, Baker P. Barrel swirl behaviour in a four-valve engine with pentroof chamber. SAE, 1995. (SAE Technical Papers). https://doi.org/10.4271/950730
Newman, A. ; Girgis, N. ; Benjamin, Stephen F. ; Baker, P. / Barrel swirl behaviour in a four-valve engine with pentroof chamber. SAE, 1995. (SAE Technical Papers).
@book{444119282b364ec09d22e0ee95e694bc,
title = "Barrel swirl behaviour in a four-valve engine with pentroof chamber",
abstract = "The purpose of this paper is to characterise barrel swirl behaviour in a production four-valve engine with pentroof chamber. Steady flow analysis showed that the insertion of tubes into the cylinder head's induction tracts increased the tumbling ratio of the in-cylinder flow field at intake valve closure. A comparison of LDA measurements, conducted along the spark plug axis, for tubes and no tubes inserted yielded the following conclusions. The results indicated that the barrel swirl generated was not efficiently breaking down into turbulence but forming two counter-rotating vortices in the horizontal cylinder plane. The turbulence levels and cycle-to-cycle flow variations towards the end of the compression stroke increased with tumbling ratio. The former suggested faster combustion rates if applied to a lean burn engine, however, the latter suggested greater cyclic combustion instability and may limit lean burn capability. Both the rotational sense of the vortices and their cyclic stability appeared to be sensitive to tumbling ratio. Publisher statement: Copyright {\circledC} 1995 SAE International. This paper is posted on this site with permission from SAE International and is for viewing only. It may not be stored on any additional repositories or retrieval systems. Further use or distribution is not permitted without permission from SAE.",
keywords = "automotive, lean burn engines, spark ignition gasoline engines, data acquisition",
author = "A. Newman and N. Girgis and Benjamin, {Stephen F.} and P. Baker",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 1995 SAE International. This paper is posted on this site with permission from SAE International and is for viewing only. It may not be stored on any additional repositories or retrieval systems. Further use or distribution is not permitted without permission from SAE.",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.4271/950730",
language = "English",
series = "SAE Technical Papers",
publisher = "SAE",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Barrel swirl behaviour in a four-valve engine with pentroof chamber

AU - Newman, A.

AU - Girgis, N.

AU - Benjamin, Stephen F.

AU - Baker, P.

N1 - Copyright © 1995 SAE International. This paper is posted on this site with permission from SAE International and is for viewing only. It may not be stored on any additional repositories or retrieval systems. Further use or distribution is not permitted without permission from SAE.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - The purpose of this paper is to characterise barrel swirl behaviour in a production four-valve engine with pentroof chamber. Steady flow analysis showed that the insertion of tubes into the cylinder head's induction tracts increased the tumbling ratio of the in-cylinder flow field at intake valve closure. A comparison of LDA measurements, conducted along the spark plug axis, for tubes and no tubes inserted yielded the following conclusions. The results indicated that the barrel swirl generated was not efficiently breaking down into turbulence but forming two counter-rotating vortices in the horizontal cylinder plane. The turbulence levels and cycle-to-cycle flow variations towards the end of the compression stroke increased with tumbling ratio. The former suggested faster combustion rates if applied to a lean burn engine, however, the latter suggested greater cyclic combustion instability and may limit lean burn capability. Both the rotational sense of the vortices and their cyclic stability appeared to be sensitive to tumbling ratio. Publisher statement: Copyright © 1995 SAE International. This paper is posted on this site with permission from SAE International and is for viewing only. It may not be stored on any additional repositories or retrieval systems. Further use or distribution is not permitted without permission from SAE.

AB - The purpose of this paper is to characterise barrel swirl behaviour in a production four-valve engine with pentroof chamber. Steady flow analysis showed that the insertion of tubes into the cylinder head's induction tracts increased the tumbling ratio of the in-cylinder flow field at intake valve closure. A comparison of LDA measurements, conducted along the spark plug axis, for tubes and no tubes inserted yielded the following conclusions. The results indicated that the barrel swirl generated was not efficiently breaking down into turbulence but forming two counter-rotating vortices in the horizontal cylinder plane. The turbulence levels and cycle-to-cycle flow variations towards the end of the compression stroke increased with tumbling ratio. The former suggested faster combustion rates if applied to a lean burn engine, however, the latter suggested greater cyclic combustion instability and may limit lean burn capability. Both the rotational sense of the vortices and their cyclic stability appeared to be sensitive to tumbling ratio. Publisher statement: Copyright © 1995 SAE International. This paper is posted on this site with permission from SAE International and is for viewing only. It may not be stored on any additional repositories or retrieval systems. Further use or distribution is not permitted without permission from SAE.

KW - automotive

KW - lean burn engines

KW - spark ignition gasoline engines

KW - data acquisition

U2 - 10.4271/950730

DO - 10.4271/950730

M3 - Other report

T3 - SAE Technical Papers

BT - Barrel swirl behaviour in a four-valve engine with pentroof chamber

PB - SAE

ER -