Bamboo reinforced concrete: a critical review

David Trujillo, Hector Archila Santos, Sebastian Kaminski, Edwin Zea Escamilla, kent Harries

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)
31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The use of small diameter whole-culm (bars) and/or split bamboo (a.k.a. splints or round strips) has often been proposed as an alternative to relatively expensive reinforcing steel in reinforced concrete. The motivation for such replacement is
typically cost—bamboo is readily available in many tropical and sub-tropical locations, whereas steel reinforcement is relatively more expensive—and more recently, the drive to find more sustainable alternatives in the construction industry. This review addresses such ‘bamboo-reinforced concrete’ and assesses its structural and environmental performance as an alternative to steel reinforced concrete. A prototype three bay portal frame, that would not be uncommon in regions of the world where bamboo reinforced concrete may be considered, is used to illustrate bamboo reinforced concrete design and as a basis for a life cycle assessment of the same. The authors conclude that, although bamboo is a material with extraordinary mechanical properties, its use in bamboo-reinforced concrete is an ill-considered concept, having significant durability, strength and stiffness issues, and does not meet the environmentally friendly credentials often attributed to it.
Original languageEnglish
Article number102
Number of pages18
JournalMaterials and Structures
Volume51
Issue number4
Early online date19 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2018

Fingerprint

Bamboo
Reinforced concrete
Steel
Construction industry
Life cycle
Reinforcement
Durability
Stiffness
Mechanical properties

Bibliographical note

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Keywords

  • Bamboo
  • Bamboo reinforcement
  • Bamboo-reinforced concrete
  • Concrete
  • Durability
  • Life cycle assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Cite this

Trujillo, D., Archila Santos, H., Kaminski, S., Zea Escamilla, E., & Harries, K. (2018). Bamboo reinforced concrete: a critical review. Materials and Structures, 51(4), [102]. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1228-6

Bamboo reinforced concrete: a critical review. / Trujillo, David; Archila Santos, Hector; Kaminski, Sebastian; Zea Escamilla, Edwin ; Harries, kent.

In: Materials and Structures, Vol. 51, No. 4, 102, 08.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Trujillo, D, Archila Santos, H, Kaminski, S, Zea Escamilla, E & Harries, K 2018, 'Bamboo reinforced concrete: a critical review' Materials and Structures, vol. 51, no. 4, 102. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1228-6
Trujillo D, Archila Santos H, Kaminski S, Zea Escamilla E, Harries K. Bamboo reinforced concrete: a critical review. Materials and Structures. 2018 Aug;51(4). 102. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1228-6
Trujillo, David ; Archila Santos, Hector ; Kaminski, Sebastian ; Zea Escamilla, Edwin ; Harries, kent. / Bamboo reinforced concrete: a critical review. In: Materials and Structures. 2018 ; Vol. 51, No. 4.
@article{0c6239907e1e4c978938998ac190ace9,
title = "Bamboo reinforced concrete: a critical review",
abstract = "The use of small diameter whole-culm (bars) and/or split bamboo (a.k.a. splints or round strips) has often been proposed as an alternative to relatively expensive reinforcing steel in reinforced concrete. The motivation for such replacement istypically cost—bamboo is readily available in many tropical and sub-tropical locations, whereas steel reinforcement is relatively more expensive—and more recently, the drive to find more sustainable alternatives in the construction industry. This review addresses such ‘bamboo-reinforced concrete’ and assesses its structural and environmental performance as an alternative to steel reinforced concrete. A prototype three bay portal frame, that would not be uncommon in regions of the world where bamboo reinforced concrete may be considered, is used to illustrate bamboo reinforced concrete design and as a basis for a life cycle assessment of the same. The authors conclude that, although bamboo is a material with extraordinary mechanical properties, its use in bamboo-reinforced concrete is an ill-considered concept, having significant durability, strength and stiffness issues, and does not meet the environmentally friendly credentials often attributed to it.",
keywords = "Bamboo, Bamboo reinforcement, Bamboo-reinforced concrete, Concrete, Durability, Life cycle assessment",
author = "David Trujillo and {Archila Santos}, Hector and Sebastian Kaminski and {Zea Escamilla}, Edwin and kent Harries",
note = "This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1617/s11527-018-1228-6",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
journal = "Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions",
issn = "1359-5997",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bamboo reinforced concrete: a critical review

AU - Trujillo, David

AU - Archila Santos, Hector

AU - Kaminski, Sebastian

AU - Zea Escamilla, Edwin

AU - Harries, kent

N1 - This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

PY - 2018/8

Y1 - 2018/8

N2 - The use of small diameter whole-culm (bars) and/or split bamboo (a.k.a. splints or round strips) has often been proposed as an alternative to relatively expensive reinforcing steel in reinforced concrete. The motivation for such replacement istypically cost—bamboo is readily available in many tropical and sub-tropical locations, whereas steel reinforcement is relatively more expensive—and more recently, the drive to find more sustainable alternatives in the construction industry. This review addresses such ‘bamboo-reinforced concrete’ and assesses its structural and environmental performance as an alternative to steel reinforced concrete. A prototype three bay portal frame, that would not be uncommon in regions of the world where bamboo reinforced concrete may be considered, is used to illustrate bamboo reinforced concrete design and as a basis for a life cycle assessment of the same. The authors conclude that, although bamboo is a material with extraordinary mechanical properties, its use in bamboo-reinforced concrete is an ill-considered concept, having significant durability, strength and stiffness issues, and does not meet the environmentally friendly credentials often attributed to it.

AB - The use of small diameter whole-culm (bars) and/or split bamboo (a.k.a. splints or round strips) has often been proposed as an alternative to relatively expensive reinforcing steel in reinforced concrete. The motivation for such replacement istypically cost—bamboo is readily available in many tropical and sub-tropical locations, whereas steel reinforcement is relatively more expensive—and more recently, the drive to find more sustainable alternatives in the construction industry. This review addresses such ‘bamboo-reinforced concrete’ and assesses its structural and environmental performance as an alternative to steel reinforced concrete. A prototype three bay portal frame, that would not be uncommon in regions of the world where bamboo reinforced concrete may be considered, is used to illustrate bamboo reinforced concrete design and as a basis for a life cycle assessment of the same. The authors conclude that, although bamboo is a material with extraordinary mechanical properties, its use in bamboo-reinforced concrete is an ill-considered concept, having significant durability, strength and stiffness issues, and does not meet the environmentally friendly credentials often attributed to it.

KW - Bamboo

KW - Bamboo reinforcement

KW - Bamboo-reinforced concrete

KW - Concrete

KW - Durability

KW - Life cycle assessment

U2 - 10.1617/s11527-018-1228-6

DO - 10.1617/s11527-018-1228-6

M3 - Article

VL - 51

JO - Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions

JF - Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions

SN - 1359-5997

IS - 4

M1 - 102

ER -