Balancing within Three Dimensions: Christianity, Secularity, and Religious Plurality in Social Policy and Theology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Arising out of UK empirical research into religion, belief and discrimination, this paper argues that the ‘three dimensional’ approach taken by the project to understanding and applying its findings is potentially applicable also in the wider European context. Arguably such an approach will enable a theological and social policy connection with respect to the Christian, secular, and religiously plural context of interreligious and wider social relations. In contrast to such an approach, a call for Christianity to retain a privileged central position within such social policy milieu does not adequately take account of the realities of a growing religious plurality as well as increasingly ‘non-religious’ or otherwise ‘secular’ dimensions of today’s world. At the same time, strident campaigns for secular measures to be given priority do not take sufficient account of the substantial numbers of those who continue to identify with a religion in varied ways, or the relatively highly valued significance of religion found especially among cultural minorities. Further, any attempt to try to ‘equalize’ the various religious traditions will run into the clearly different historical and social position of Christianity within Europe; while any of the apparently seductive options for the religions to form a ‘united front’, either apart from or over and against the secular, would likely result in damage to the theological and social health of all the religions. In contrast to these approaches, I argue that in both theology and social policy, a balancing of the Christian, secular and religiously plural dimensions is capable of facilitating the kind of evolutionary development that can mediate constructively between the importance of historical inheritance and the need for adaptive and creative change within interreligious and wider social relations.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2
Pages (from-to)131-146
Number of pages16
JournalStudies in Interreligious Dialogue
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Mar 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

theology
Christianity
Religion
Social Relations
united front
social position
empirical research
damages
discrimination
campaign
Social Policy
Secularity
Religious Plurality
Theology
minority
health
Interreligious

Keywords

  • Christian
  • Secular
  • Religiously plural
  • Society
  • State
  • religion and belief

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{d3baa09549ee494b9594ce03070a43cd,
title = "Balancing within Three Dimensions: Christianity, Secularity, and Religious Plurality in Social Policy and Theology",
abstract = "Arising out of UK empirical research into religion, belief and discrimination, this paper argues that the ‘three dimensional’ approach taken by the project to understanding and applying its findings is potentially applicable also in the wider European context. Arguably such an approach will enable a theological and social policy connection with respect to the Christian, secular, and religiously plural context of interreligious and wider social relations. In contrast to such an approach, a call for Christianity to retain a privileged central position within such social policy milieu does not adequately take account of the realities of a growing religious plurality as well as increasingly ‘non-religious’ or otherwise ‘secular’ dimensions of today’s world. At the same time, strident campaigns for secular measures to be given priority do not take sufficient account of the substantial numbers of those who continue to identify with a religion in varied ways, or the relatively highly valued significance of religion found especially among cultural minorities. Further, any attempt to try to ‘equalize’ the various religious traditions will run into the clearly different historical and social position of Christianity within Europe; while any of the apparently seductive options for the religions to form a ‘united front’, either apart from or over and against the secular, would likely result in damage to the theological and social health of all the religions. In contrast to these approaches, I argue that in both theology and social policy, a balancing of the Christian, secular and religiously plural dimensions is capable of facilitating the kind of evolutionary development that can mediate constructively between the importance of historical inheritance and the need for adaptive and creative change within interreligious and wider social relations.",
keywords = "Christian, Secular, Religiously plural, Society, State, religion and belief",
author = "Paul Weller",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "3",
doi = "10.2143/SID.26.2.3200411",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "131--146",
journal = "Studies in Interreligious Dialogue",
issn = "0926-2326",
publisher = "Peeters Publishers",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Balancing within Three Dimensions

T2 - Christianity, Secularity, and Religious Plurality in Social Policy and Theology

AU - Weller, Paul

PY - 2017/3/3

Y1 - 2017/3/3

N2 - Arising out of UK empirical research into religion, belief and discrimination, this paper argues that the ‘three dimensional’ approach taken by the project to understanding and applying its findings is potentially applicable also in the wider European context. Arguably such an approach will enable a theological and social policy connection with respect to the Christian, secular, and religiously plural context of interreligious and wider social relations. In contrast to such an approach, a call for Christianity to retain a privileged central position within such social policy milieu does not adequately take account of the realities of a growing religious plurality as well as increasingly ‘non-religious’ or otherwise ‘secular’ dimensions of today’s world. At the same time, strident campaigns for secular measures to be given priority do not take sufficient account of the substantial numbers of those who continue to identify with a religion in varied ways, or the relatively highly valued significance of religion found especially among cultural minorities. Further, any attempt to try to ‘equalize’ the various religious traditions will run into the clearly different historical and social position of Christianity within Europe; while any of the apparently seductive options for the religions to form a ‘united front’, either apart from or over and against the secular, would likely result in damage to the theological and social health of all the religions. In contrast to these approaches, I argue that in both theology and social policy, a balancing of the Christian, secular and religiously plural dimensions is capable of facilitating the kind of evolutionary development that can mediate constructively between the importance of historical inheritance and the need for adaptive and creative change within interreligious and wider social relations.

AB - Arising out of UK empirical research into religion, belief and discrimination, this paper argues that the ‘three dimensional’ approach taken by the project to understanding and applying its findings is potentially applicable also in the wider European context. Arguably such an approach will enable a theological and social policy connection with respect to the Christian, secular, and religiously plural context of interreligious and wider social relations. In contrast to such an approach, a call for Christianity to retain a privileged central position within such social policy milieu does not adequately take account of the realities of a growing religious plurality as well as increasingly ‘non-religious’ or otherwise ‘secular’ dimensions of today’s world. At the same time, strident campaigns for secular measures to be given priority do not take sufficient account of the substantial numbers of those who continue to identify with a religion in varied ways, or the relatively highly valued significance of religion found especially among cultural minorities. Further, any attempt to try to ‘equalize’ the various religious traditions will run into the clearly different historical and social position of Christianity within Europe; while any of the apparently seductive options for the religions to form a ‘united front’, either apart from or over and against the secular, would likely result in damage to the theological and social health of all the religions. In contrast to these approaches, I argue that in both theology and social policy, a balancing of the Christian, secular and religiously plural dimensions is capable of facilitating the kind of evolutionary development that can mediate constructively between the importance of historical inheritance and the need for adaptive and creative change within interreligious and wider social relations.

KW - Christian

KW - Secular

KW - Religiously plural

KW - Society

KW - State

KW - religion and belief

U2 - 10.2143/SID.26.2.3200411

DO - 10.2143/SID.26.2.3200411

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 131

EP - 146

JO - Studies in Interreligious Dialogue

JF - Studies in Interreligious Dialogue

SN - 0926-2326

IS - 2

M1 - 2

ER -