Aviation planning policy in Australia: Identifying frames of reference to support public decision making

Rob Kivits, M. B. Charles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aviation planning policy in Australia, particularly as it pertains to the expansion of privatized capital city
airports, continues to be problematic as a result of legislation that requires federal approval for
infrastructure-related projects on airport land, but only requires other stakeholders, such as state and
local governments, together with resident groups, to be consulted. This study employs Q-methodology to
identify the frames of references held by those participating in the Australian aviation stakeholder arena
to develop a better understanding of the context in which existing federal policy sits and to allow airport
planners to navigate their way through the views of relevant stakeholders. The identification of these
frames of reference across three Australian capital city airports also revealed two underlying nation-wide
discourses of ‘power’ and ‘functionality’ pertaining to utilization of the airport space, and aviation in
general. These outcomes, though not providing a solution to existing controversies relating to airport
expansion, nevertheless concretize the prevailing discourses that should be addressed when formulating
and enacting aviation planning policy across the nation.
©
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)102-111
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Air Transport Management
Volume47
Issue numberAugust
Early online date28 May 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

public support
airport
air traffic
Aviation
stakeholder
Decision making
Airports
decision making
Planning
planning
capital city
federal policy
legislation
functionality
methodology
utilization
resident
public
policy
Public support

Keywords

  • Aviation policy
  • Airport planning
  • Land use
  • Australia
  • Q-method

Cite this

Aviation planning policy in Australia : Identifying frames of reference to support public decision making. / Kivits, Rob; Charles, M. B.

In: Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 47, No. August, 08.2015, p. 102-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e12a47deed75405086c745e112e3c932,
title = "Aviation planning policy in Australia: Identifying frames of reference to support public decision making",
abstract = "Aviation planning policy in Australia, particularly as it pertains to the expansion of privatized capital cityairports, continues to be problematic as a result of legislation that requires federal approval forinfrastructure-related projects on airport land, but only requires other stakeholders, such as state andlocal governments, together with resident groups, to be consulted. This study employs Q-methodology toidentify the frames of references held by those participating in the Australian aviation stakeholder arenato develop a better understanding of the context in which existing federal policy sits and to allow airportplanners to navigate their way through the views of relevant stakeholders. The identification of theseframes of reference across three Australian capital city airports also revealed two underlying nation-widediscourses of ‘power’ and ‘functionality’ pertaining to utilization of the airport space, and aviation ingeneral. These outcomes, though not providing a solution to existing controversies relating to airportexpansion, nevertheless concretize the prevailing discourses that should be addressed when formulatingand enacting aviation planning policy across the nation.{\circledC}",
keywords = "Aviation policy, Airport planning, Land use, Australia, Q-method",
author = "Rob Kivits and Charles, {M. B.}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.05.005",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "102--111",
journal = "Journal of Air Transport Management",
issn = "0969-6997",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "August",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aviation planning policy in Australia

T2 - Identifying frames of reference to support public decision making

AU - Kivits, Rob

AU - Charles, M. B.

PY - 2015/8

Y1 - 2015/8

N2 - Aviation planning policy in Australia, particularly as it pertains to the expansion of privatized capital cityairports, continues to be problematic as a result of legislation that requires federal approval forinfrastructure-related projects on airport land, but only requires other stakeholders, such as state andlocal governments, together with resident groups, to be consulted. This study employs Q-methodology toidentify the frames of references held by those participating in the Australian aviation stakeholder arenato develop a better understanding of the context in which existing federal policy sits and to allow airportplanners to navigate their way through the views of relevant stakeholders. The identification of theseframes of reference across three Australian capital city airports also revealed two underlying nation-widediscourses of ‘power’ and ‘functionality’ pertaining to utilization of the airport space, and aviation ingeneral. These outcomes, though not providing a solution to existing controversies relating to airportexpansion, nevertheless concretize the prevailing discourses that should be addressed when formulatingand enacting aviation planning policy across the nation.©

AB - Aviation planning policy in Australia, particularly as it pertains to the expansion of privatized capital cityairports, continues to be problematic as a result of legislation that requires federal approval forinfrastructure-related projects on airport land, but only requires other stakeholders, such as state andlocal governments, together with resident groups, to be consulted. This study employs Q-methodology toidentify the frames of references held by those participating in the Australian aviation stakeholder arenato develop a better understanding of the context in which existing federal policy sits and to allow airportplanners to navigate their way through the views of relevant stakeholders. The identification of theseframes of reference across three Australian capital city airports also revealed two underlying nation-widediscourses of ‘power’ and ‘functionality’ pertaining to utilization of the airport space, and aviation ingeneral. These outcomes, though not providing a solution to existing controversies relating to airportexpansion, nevertheless concretize the prevailing discourses that should be addressed when formulatingand enacting aviation planning policy across the nation.©

KW - Aviation policy

KW - Airport planning

KW - Land use

KW - Australia

KW - Q-method

U2 - 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.05.005

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 102

EP - 111

JO - Journal of Air Transport Management

JF - Journal of Air Transport Management

SN - 0969-6997

IS - August

ER -