Automated blood pressure measurement: Reasons for measurement variability uncovered

D. Zheng, J.N. Amoore, S. Mieke, F.E. Smith, S. T. King, A. Murray

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding

7 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The most common automated blood pressure devices determine systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure (SBP, DBP and MAP) by analysing the oscillometric pulse waveform. The aim of this study was to assess the variability of the amplitude of oscillometric pulse waveform characteristics at SBP, DBP and MAP. Sixty oscillometric waveforms from twenty subjects were analysed. Manual SBP and DBP were obtained with a manual sphygmomanometer, from which manual MAP was calculated from the empirical equation. Automated MAP was estimated from the maximum oscillometric pulse. The oscillometric pulse amplitudes, normalised to the maximum pulse, at above SBP, SBP, MAP, DBP and below DBP were then determined. The cuff pressures at half the maximum oscillometric pulse amplitude were also measured. There were significant differences in normalised oscillometric pulse amplitude between SBP and DBP (mean ± SD: 0.45 ± 0.10 vs 0.80 ± 0.12, P < 0.001), and between manual and automated MAP (0.89 ± 0.09 vs 1.00 ± 0, P < 0.001). Manual SBP (118 ± 11 mmHg) and DBP (76 ± 9 mmHg) were significantly different from the cuff pressures at half the maximum oscillometric pulse amplitude (117 ± 12 mmHg and 66 ± 10 mmHg), with the paired differences of 1 ± 5 mmHg (P < 0.05) and 10 ± 7 mmHg (P < 0.001) respectively. Significant differences between manual and automated MAP were also observed, with the paired difference of 3 ± 6 mmHg (P < 0.001). In conclusion, there are large variations in the pulse characteristics at SBP, DBP and MAP. This complicates a reliable automatic estimation of these values.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationComputers in Cardiology
PublisherIEEE
Pages21-24
Number of pages4
Volume36
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-4244-7282-6
ISBN (Print)978-1-4244-7281-9
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes
Event36th Annual Computers in Cardiology Conference - Park City, United States
Duration: 13 Sep 200916 Sep 2009

Publication series

Name
ISSN (Print)0276-6574
ISSN (Electronic)2325-8853

Conference

Conference36th Annual Computers in Cardiology Conference
CountryUnited States
CityPark City
Period13/09/0916/09/09

Bibliographical note

Since volume 33 (2006), CinC has been an open-access publication, in which copyright in each article is held by its authors, who grant permission to copy and redistribute their work with attribution, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.

Keywords

  • Pressure measurement
  • Blood pressure
  • Physics
  • Hospitals
  • Bladder
  • Equations
  • Pulse measurements
  • Cardiology
  • Iron
  • Medical services

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Automated blood pressure measurement: Reasons for measurement variability uncovered'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Zheng, D., Amoore, J. N., Mieke, S., Smith, F. E., King, S. T., & Murray, A. (2009). Automated blood pressure measurement: Reasons for measurement variability uncovered. In Computers in Cardiology (Vol. 36, pp. 21-24). IEEE.