TY - JOUR
T1 - Author Correction: Time trend and Bayesian mapping of multiple myeloma incidence in Sardinia, Italy
AU - Broccia, Giorgio
AU - Carter, Jonathan
AU - Ozsin-Ozler, Cansu
AU - Meloni, Federico
AU - Pilia, Ilaria
AU - De Matteis, Sara
AU - Cocco, Pierluigi
N1 - Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
PY - 2022/3/2
Y1 - 2022/3/2
N2 - The original version of this Article contained an error in the Results section, under subheading “Geographic map of MM incidence”, “These are: Arborea (9 cases, likelihood ratio 20.2, P = 0.953), Padria (5 cases, likelihood ratio 20.2, P = 0.953), Benetutti (8 cases, likelihood ratio 46.8, P = 0.979), Bitti (11 cases, likelihood ratio 59.2, P = 0.983), Oschiri (5 cases, likelihood ratio 70.0, P = 0.986), Perfugas (10 cases, likelihood ratio 75.2, P = 0.987), and Seneghe (9 cases, likelihood ratio 177.9, P = 0.994).” now reads: “These are: Arborea (9 cases, likelihood ratio 20.2, P = 0.953), Padria (5 cases, likelihood ratio 20.2, P = 0.953), Benetutti (8 cases, likelihood ratio 46.8, P = 0.979), Bitti (11 cases, likelihood ratio 59.2, P = 0.983), Oschiri (11 cases, likelihood ratio 70.0, P = 0.986), Perfugas (10 cases, likelihood ratio 75.2, P = 0.987), and Seneghe (9 cases, likelihood ratio 177.9, P = 0.994).” The original Article has been corrected.
AB - The original version of this Article contained an error in the Results section, under subheading “Geographic map of MM incidence”, “These are: Arborea (9 cases, likelihood ratio 20.2, P = 0.953), Padria (5 cases, likelihood ratio 20.2, P = 0.953), Benetutti (8 cases, likelihood ratio 46.8, P = 0.979), Bitti (11 cases, likelihood ratio 59.2, P = 0.983), Oschiri (5 cases, likelihood ratio 70.0, P = 0.986), Perfugas (10 cases, likelihood ratio 75.2, P = 0.987), and Seneghe (9 cases, likelihood ratio 177.9, P = 0.994).” now reads: “These are: Arborea (9 cases, likelihood ratio 20.2, P = 0.953), Padria (5 cases, likelihood ratio 20.2, P = 0.953), Benetutti (8 cases, likelihood ratio 46.8, P = 0.979), Bitti (11 cases, likelihood ratio 59.2, P = 0.983), Oschiri (11 cases, likelihood ratio 70.0, P = 0.986), Perfugas (10 cases, likelihood ratio 75.2, P = 0.987), and Seneghe (9 cases, likelihood ratio 177.9, P = 0.994).” The original Article has been corrected.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125569153&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41598-022-07811-2
DO - 10.1038/s41598-022-07811-2
M3 - Article
SN - 2045-2322
VL - 12
JO - Scientific Reports
JF - Scientific Reports
IS - 1
M1 - 3779
ER -