Associations between perceived and actual physical literacy level in Chinese primary school children

Ming Hui Li, Raymond Kim Wai Sum, Cindy Hui Ping Sit, Stephen Heung Sang Wong, Amy Sau Ching Ha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)
54 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The concept of physical literacy (PL) is gaining popularity within public health and physical education circles. However, little is known about the relationship between perceived and actual PL levels among school-aged children. The aim of this study is to explore the associations between perceived and actual levels of PL of primary school students in China.
Methods: A total of 327 children (153 boys and 174 girls) with a mean (SD) age of 10.0 (±1.0) years were included for analysis. PL perceptions were measured using the Perceived Physical Literacy Instrument. Children’s actual level of PL was objectively assessed by the Chinese version of the Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy, 2nd edition, which consists of four domains: Daily Behavior, Physical Competence, Motivation and Confidence, and Knowledge and Understanding. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were calculated to examine the relationship between students’ perceived and actual PL levels, whereas Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) was calculated to investigate the gender, relative age differences, and interaction effect (2 × 4) on perceived and actual PL levels respectively.
Results: Significant correlations were observed between the perceptions and actual PL scores in both boys (r = .46, p < .01) and girls (r = .41, p < .01). Low to moderate significances were shown between each domain of perceived PL and actual PL (from .16 to .49). Further MANOVA results revealed that there were significant gender differences in the Daily Behavior domain of actual PL (F (1, 319) = 30.15, p < .001, Wilks’ Λ = 540.88, η2partial = .09). Overall, boys had both higher actual PL scores (58.9) and PL perceptions (37.3) than girls. Neither relative age effect nor interaction effect (2 × 4) was observed for the current participants in all the variables.
Conclusions: This study is the first to examine the associations between the perceived and actual levels of PL in Chinese children. Additional studies should explore the importance of children’s perceptions of PL when assessing the actual level of PL in physical education and health settings. Girls should be more encouraged by PE teachers to participate actively in physical activities in the school environment.
Original languageEnglish
Article number207 (2020)
Number of pages9
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume20
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 Feb 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Funder

This study was funded by the General Research Fund (Grant Number: 14602516) from University Grant Committee, and the Direct Grant for Research (Grant Number: EDU2018–052) of the Chinese University of Hong Kong, which had no roles in the design of the study or in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript.

Keywords

  • Perceived physical literacy
  • Physical literacy and physical activity
  • Associations
  • Primary school children

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Associations between perceived and actual physical literacy level in Chinese primary school children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this