Recent scholarship has demonstrated an increasing awareness of the need for more grounded, empirical research into the micro-level dynamics of violent contexts. Research in these difficult, dangerous and potentially violent conflict or post-conflict settings necessitates the formation of new relationships of dependency, and assistants, friends, collaborators and guides become central figures in the field. However, all too often, these figures are written out of academic accounts and silenced in our analyses. This not only does them a significant disservice, but it also obscures potential biases, complexities and ethical dilemmas that emerge in the way in which such research is carried out. Drawing upon fieldwork exploring the 2007-2008 Kenyan postelection violence, this paper argues that reliance upon insider-assistants is essential in conflict settings and explores the challenges inherent in these relationships. As researchers become increasingly engaged in micro-level studies of violent contexts, we must interrogate the realities of how our knowledge has been produced and engage in more open and honest discussions of the methodological and ethical challenges of conflict research.
|Journal||Journal of Contemporary Ethnography|
|Early online date||18 Dec 2015|
|Publication status||Published - 1 Apr 2018|
Bibliographical noteArticle in press, full citation details will be updated once available.
- Conflict research