Assessing the Quality of Oil and Gas project EISs: A Preface

Babatunde Anifowose, Damian Lawler, Dan van der Horst, Lee Chapman

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding

Abstract

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is designed to anticipate and mitigate project impacts starting from the front-end engineering design stage to decommissioning. To further our understanding of the gaps between EIA predictions and the actual impacts of oil and gas projects, it may be plausible to independently review the quality of projects' EISs. There is currently no published academic literature on the role of EIS quality as a precursor to socio-environmental consequences of oil and gas exploration, production and transportation. The only known study of EIS quality in the oil industry was commissioned by UK Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR). This paper examines the quality of nineteen sampled EISs using the Lee and Colley model. The model was adapted based on local and international best practices, peculiarity of oil and gas projects and learning from past research. The European Commission checklist on EIA-EIS quality (2001) and World Bank EA Sourcebook (Energy & Industry) (1999) were also consulted. Lee and Colley model was modified by adding a new review area on decommissioning/abandonment. Preliminary findings reveal a marginal but not significant improvement in the quality of sampled EISs. The analysis suggests 53% of the sampled EISs were of satisfactory quality. The main weakness common to about 80% of sampled EIS include decommissioning, impact evaluation and impact prediction. There is the problem of environmental stasis which has resulted in impacts not being predicted as deviation from baseline condition. Key areas of strength include descriptive and presentational tasks. Independent review of oil and gas project EISs is imperative given the recent Gulf of Mexico Macondo oilfield deepwater disaster. Preliminary investigations into this disaster suggest the drilling operation was exempted from detailed EIS. Independent quality review of EISs could help restore public confidence in the oil industry.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Society of Petroleum Engineers European Health, Safety and Environmental Conference in Oil & Gas Expl. & Production, held 22-24 Feb 2011
Place of PublicationVienna, Austria
PublisherSociety of Petroleum Engineers
Pages1-19
Number of pages20
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2011
EventSPE European Health, Safety and Environmental Conference in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production - Vienna, Austria
Duration: 22 Feb 201124 Aug 2011

Conference

ConferenceSPE European Health, Safety and Environmental Conference in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production
CountryAustria
CityVienna
Period22/02/1124/08/11

Fingerprint

Environmental impact assessments
Gases
Industry
Disasters
Oils
Drilling

Cite this

Anifowose, B., Lawler, D., van der Horst, D., & Chapman, L. (2011). Assessing the Quality of Oil and Gas project EISs: A Preface. In Proceedings of the Society of Petroleum Engineers European Health, Safety and Environmental Conference in Oil & Gas Expl. & Production, held 22-24 Feb 2011 (pp. 1-19). Vienna, Austria: Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/140661-MS

Assessing the Quality of Oil and Gas project EISs : A Preface. / Anifowose, Babatunde; Lawler, Damian; van der Horst, Dan; Chapman, Lee.

Proceedings of the Society of Petroleum Engineers European Health, Safety and Environmental Conference in Oil & Gas Expl. & Production, held 22-24 Feb 2011 . Vienna, Austria : Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2011. p. 1-19.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding

Anifowose, B, Lawler, D, van der Horst, D & Chapman, L 2011, Assessing the Quality of Oil and Gas project EISs: A Preface. in Proceedings of the Society of Petroleum Engineers European Health, Safety and Environmental Conference in Oil & Gas Expl. & Production, held 22-24 Feb 2011 . Society of Petroleum Engineers, Vienna, Austria, pp. 1-19, SPE European Health, Safety and Environmental Conference in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Vienna, Austria, 22/02/11. https://doi.org/10.2118/140661-MS
Anifowose B, Lawler D, van der Horst D, Chapman L. Assessing the Quality of Oil and Gas project EISs: A Preface. In Proceedings of the Society of Petroleum Engineers European Health, Safety and Environmental Conference in Oil & Gas Expl. & Production, held 22-24 Feb 2011 . Vienna, Austria: Society of Petroleum Engineers. 2011. p. 1-19 https://doi.org/10.2118/140661-MS
Anifowose, Babatunde ; Lawler, Damian ; van der Horst, Dan ; Chapman, Lee. / Assessing the Quality of Oil and Gas project EISs : A Preface. Proceedings of the Society of Petroleum Engineers European Health, Safety and Environmental Conference in Oil & Gas Expl. & Production, held 22-24 Feb 2011 . Vienna, Austria : Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2011. pp. 1-19
@inproceedings{172233426a344e8ebc37a48dbf3ee580,
title = "Assessing the Quality of Oil and Gas project EISs: A Preface",
abstract = "Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is designed to anticipate and mitigate project impacts starting from the front-end engineering design stage to decommissioning. To further our understanding of the gaps between EIA predictions and the actual impacts of oil and gas projects, it may be plausible to independently review the quality of projects' EISs. There is currently no published academic literature on the role of EIS quality as a precursor to socio-environmental consequences of oil and gas exploration, production and transportation. The only known study of EIS quality in the oil industry was commissioned by UK Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR). This paper examines the quality of nineteen sampled EISs using the Lee and Colley model. The model was adapted based on local and international best practices, peculiarity of oil and gas projects and learning from past research. The European Commission checklist on EIA-EIS quality (2001) and World Bank EA Sourcebook (Energy & Industry) (1999) were also consulted. Lee and Colley model was modified by adding a new review area on decommissioning/abandonment. Preliminary findings reveal a marginal but not significant improvement in the quality of sampled EISs. The analysis suggests 53{\%} of the sampled EISs were of satisfactory quality. The main weakness common to about 80{\%} of sampled EIS include decommissioning, impact evaluation and impact prediction. There is the problem of environmental stasis which has resulted in impacts not being predicted as deviation from baseline condition. Key areas of strength include descriptive and presentational tasks. Independent review of oil and gas project EISs is imperative given the recent Gulf of Mexico Macondo oilfield deepwater disaster. Preliminary investigations into this disaster suggest the drilling operation was exempted from detailed EIS. Independent quality review of EISs could help restore public confidence in the oil industry.",
author = "Babatunde Anifowose and Damian Lawler and {van der Horst}, Dan and Lee Chapman",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2118/140661-MS",
language = "English",
pages = "1--19",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Society of Petroleum Engineers European Health, Safety and Environmental Conference in Oil & Gas Expl. & Production, held 22-24 Feb 2011",
publisher = "Society of Petroleum Engineers",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Assessing the Quality of Oil and Gas project EISs

T2 - A Preface

AU - Anifowose, Babatunde

AU - Lawler, Damian

AU - van der Horst, Dan

AU - Chapman, Lee

PY - 2011/2/1

Y1 - 2011/2/1

N2 - Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is designed to anticipate and mitigate project impacts starting from the front-end engineering design stage to decommissioning. To further our understanding of the gaps between EIA predictions and the actual impacts of oil and gas projects, it may be plausible to independently review the quality of projects' EISs. There is currently no published academic literature on the role of EIS quality as a precursor to socio-environmental consequences of oil and gas exploration, production and transportation. The only known study of EIS quality in the oil industry was commissioned by UK Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR). This paper examines the quality of nineteen sampled EISs using the Lee and Colley model. The model was adapted based on local and international best practices, peculiarity of oil and gas projects and learning from past research. The European Commission checklist on EIA-EIS quality (2001) and World Bank EA Sourcebook (Energy & Industry) (1999) were also consulted. Lee and Colley model was modified by adding a new review area on decommissioning/abandonment. Preliminary findings reveal a marginal but not significant improvement in the quality of sampled EISs. The analysis suggests 53% of the sampled EISs were of satisfactory quality. The main weakness common to about 80% of sampled EIS include decommissioning, impact evaluation and impact prediction. There is the problem of environmental stasis which has resulted in impacts not being predicted as deviation from baseline condition. Key areas of strength include descriptive and presentational tasks. Independent review of oil and gas project EISs is imperative given the recent Gulf of Mexico Macondo oilfield deepwater disaster. Preliminary investigations into this disaster suggest the drilling operation was exempted from detailed EIS. Independent quality review of EISs could help restore public confidence in the oil industry.

AB - Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is designed to anticipate and mitigate project impacts starting from the front-end engineering design stage to decommissioning. To further our understanding of the gaps between EIA predictions and the actual impacts of oil and gas projects, it may be plausible to independently review the quality of projects' EISs. There is currently no published academic literature on the role of EIS quality as a precursor to socio-environmental consequences of oil and gas exploration, production and transportation. The only known study of EIS quality in the oil industry was commissioned by UK Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR). This paper examines the quality of nineteen sampled EISs using the Lee and Colley model. The model was adapted based on local and international best practices, peculiarity of oil and gas projects and learning from past research. The European Commission checklist on EIA-EIS quality (2001) and World Bank EA Sourcebook (Energy & Industry) (1999) were also consulted. Lee and Colley model was modified by adding a new review area on decommissioning/abandonment. Preliminary findings reveal a marginal but not significant improvement in the quality of sampled EISs. The analysis suggests 53% of the sampled EISs were of satisfactory quality. The main weakness common to about 80% of sampled EIS include decommissioning, impact evaluation and impact prediction. There is the problem of environmental stasis which has resulted in impacts not being predicted as deviation from baseline condition. Key areas of strength include descriptive and presentational tasks. Independent review of oil and gas project EISs is imperative given the recent Gulf of Mexico Macondo oilfield deepwater disaster. Preliminary investigations into this disaster suggest the drilling operation was exempted from detailed EIS. Independent quality review of EISs could help restore public confidence in the oil industry.

U2 - 10.2118/140661-MS

DO - 10.2118/140661-MS

M3 - Conference proceeding

SP - 1

EP - 19

BT - Proceedings of the Society of Petroleum Engineers European Health, Safety and Environmental Conference in Oil & Gas Expl. & Production, held 22-24 Feb 2011

PB - Society of Petroleum Engineers

CY - Vienna, Austria

ER -