Assessing efficiency differences between Thai public and private firms

D. Ghosh, Sailesh Tanna, W. Sukrattanawong, M. Bailey

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This paper investigates the relative performance of a small number of public and private firms in Thailand. The main aim is to assess recent privatisation efforts in Thailand by examining the influence of ownership on performance. The empirical investigation is initially focused on a matched-pair combination of (public vs. private) firms, mainly in the insurance and banking sectors, but later we also examine the performance of a small number of recently privatised organisations, mainly in the commercial sector. Additionally, we estimate by pooled regression the productivity of labour and capital for an extended group of firms in the financial services industry, and explain the public-private factor productivity differences derived thereof. Although we find some basic underlying efficiency differences between the two groups of firms, it is hard to attribute such differences purely to ownership as other factors like market competition might have played a part. This leads us to argue that efficiency gains from on-going privatisation efforts in Thailand may not be realised without adequate measures designed to promote competition.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationGlobal Business & Economics Review - Anthology 2000
Place of PublicationWorcester, MA
PublisherBusiness & Economics Society International
Pages232-246
ISBN (Print)0965983137
Publication statusPublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Public firm
Private firms
Thailand
Ownership
Privatization
Productivity
Factors
Public-private
Empirical investigation
Labor
Efficiency gains
Financial services industry
Market competition
Insurance
Banking sector
Relative performance

Bibliographical note

The full text of this item is not available from the repository. This paper was presented at the Business & Economics Society International Conference, Dec. 2000, Los Angeles.

Keywords

  • privatisation
  • Thailand
  • efficiency

Cite this

Ghosh, D., Tanna, S., Sukrattanawong, W., & Bailey, M. (2000). Assessing efficiency differences between Thai public and private firms. In Global Business & Economics Review - Anthology 2000 (pp. 232-246). Worcester, MA: Business & Economics Society International.

Assessing efficiency differences between Thai public and private firms. / Ghosh, D.; Tanna, Sailesh; Sukrattanawong, W.; Bailey, M.

Global Business & Economics Review - Anthology 2000. Worcester, MA : Business & Economics Society International, 2000. p. 232-246.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Ghosh, D, Tanna, S, Sukrattanawong, W & Bailey, M 2000, Assessing efficiency differences between Thai public and private firms. in Global Business & Economics Review - Anthology 2000. Business & Economics Society International, Worcester, MA, pp. 232-246.
Ghosh D, Tanna S, Sukrattanawong W, Bailey M. Assessing efficiency differences between Thai public and private firms. In Global Business & Economics Review - Anthology 2000. Worcester, MA: Business & Economics Society International. 2000. p. 232-246
Ghosh, D. ; Tanna, Sailesh ; Sukrattanawong, W. ; Bailey, M. / Assessing efficiency differences between Thai public and private firms. Global Business & Economics Review - Anthology 2000. Worcester, MA : Business & Economics Society International, 2000. pp. 232-246
@inbook{10b2d101dd7544e9b39122e0eff737ad,
title = "Assessing efficiency differences between Thai public and private firms",
abstract = "This paper investigates the relative performance of a small number of public and private firms in Thailand. The main aim is to assess recent privatisation efforts in Thailand by examining the influence of ownership on performance. The empirical investigation is initially focused on a matched-pair combination of (public vs. private) firms, mainly in the insurance and banking sectors, but later we also examine the performance of a small number of recently privatised organisations, mainly in the commercial sector. Additionally, we estimate by pooled regression the productivity of labour and capital for an extended group of firms in the financial services industry, and explain the public-private factor productivity differences derived thereof. Although we find some basic underlying efficiency differences between the two groups of firms, it is hard to attribute such differences purely to ownership as other factors like market competition might have played a part. This leads us to argue that efficiency gains from on-going privatisation efforts in Thailand may not be realised without adequate measures designed to promote competition.",
keywords = "privatisation, Thailand, efficiency",
author = "D. Ghosh and Sailesh Tanna and W. Sukrattanawong and M. Bailey",
note = "The full text of this item is not available from the repository. This paper was presented at the Business & Economics Society International Conference, Dec. 2000, Los Angeles.",
year = "2000",
language = "English",
isbn = "0965983137",
pages = "232--246",
booktitle = "Global Business & Economics Review - Anthology 2000",
publisher = "Business & Economics Society International",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Assessing efficiency differences between Thai public and private firms

AU - Ghosh, D.

AU - Tanna, Sailesh

AU - Sukrattanawong, W.

AU - Bailey, M.

N1 - The full text of this item is not available from the repository. This paper was presented at the Business & Economics Society International Conference, Dec. 2000, Los Angeles.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - This paper investigates the relative performance of a small number of public and private firms in Thailand. The main aim is to assess recent privatisation efforts in Thailand by examining the influence of ownership on performance. The empirical investigation is initially focused on a matched-pair combination of (public vs. private) firms, mainly in the insurance and banking sectors, but later we also examine the performance of a small number of recently privatised organisations, mainly in the commercial sector. Additionally, we estimate by pooled regression the productivity of labour and capital for an extended group of firms in the financial services industry, and explain the public-private factor productivity differences derived thereof. Although we find some basic underlying efficiency differences between the two groups of firms, it is hard to attribute such differences purely to ownership as other factors like market competition might have played a part. This leads us to argue that efficiency gains from on-going privatisation efforts in Thailand may not be realised without adequate measures designed to promote competition.

AB - This paper investigates the relative performance of a small number of public and private firms in Thailand. The main aim is to assess recent privatisation efforts in Thailand by examining the influence of ownership on performance. The empirical investigation is initially focused on a matched-pair combination of (public vs. private) firms, mainly in the insurance and banking sectors, but later we also examine the performance of a small number of recently privatised organisations, mainly in the commercial sector. Additionally, we estimate by pooled regression the productivity of labour and capital for an extended group of firms in the financial services industry, and explain the public-private factor productivity differences derived thereof. Although we find some basic underlying efficiency differences between the two groups of firms, it is hard to attribute such differences purely to ownership as other factors like market competition might have played a part. This leads us to argue that efficiency gains from on-going privatisation efforts in Thailand may not be realised without adequate measures designed to promote competition.

KW - privatisation

KW - Thailand

KW - efficiency

M3 - Chapter

SN - 0965983137

SP - 232

EP - 246

BT - Global Business & Economics Review - Anthology 2000

PB - Business & Economics Society International

CY - Worcester, MA

ER -