Approaching the unsynthesizable in international politics: Giving substance to security discourses through basso ostinato?

Felix Rösch, A. Watanabe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
38 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article addresses the question of how spatial difference manifests itself in International Relations discourses in an effort to theorize difference in international politics. In doing so, we focus on the concept of security in particular and demonstrate a paradox in its conceptualization. Despite the aspiration to capture global diversity, contemporary security discourses largely leave out the moment of subjectification in knowledge-construction. Rather, a form of subjectivity construction is promoted in these discourses, which is reliant on the other. In contrast, this article considers the unsynthesizable cognitive void between the self and the other through the work of the Japanese political scientist Maruyama Masao and his basso ostinato concept. By drafting it as a heuristic device to avoid the potential of determinism for which basso ostinato was criticized, we apply it to the concept of comprehensive security with the intention to demonstrate that ostensibly similar concepts can have different meanings in different times and spaces. In doing so, we aim to transcend the resulting misunderstandings that obstruct International Relations scholarship from contributing to what Amitav Acharya calls ‘Global IR’.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)609-629
JournalEuropean Journal of International Relations
Volume23
Issue number3
Early online date13 Jul 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2017

Fingerprint

International Politics
discourse
international relations
determinism
political scientist
subjectivity
heuristics

Keywords

  • Basso Ostinato
  • International Relations Theory
  • Japanese Political Thought
  • Maruyama Masao
  • Security
  • Unsynthesizable

Cite this

@article{9595e806cea64f24bde09f2b7d80c5e3,
title = "Approaching the unsynthesizable in international politics: Giving substance to security discourses through basso ostinato?",
abstract = "This article addresses the question of how spatial difference manifests itself in International Relations discourses in an effort to theorize difference in international politics. In doing so, we focus on the concept of security in particular and demonstrate a paradox in its conceptualization. Despite the aspiration to capture global diversity, contemporary security discourses largely leave out the moment of subjectification in knowledge-construction. Rather, a form of subjectivity construction is promoted in these discourses, which is reliant on the other. In contrast, this article considers the unsynthesizable cognitive void between the self and the other through the work of the Japanese political scientist Maruyama Masao and his basso ostinato concept. By drafting it as a heuristic device to avoid the potential of determinism for which basso ostinato was criticized, we apply it to the concept of comprehensive security with the intention to demonstrate that ostensibly similar concepts can have different meanings in different times and spaces. In doing so, we aim to transcend the resulting misunderstandings that obstruct International Relations scholarship from contributing to what Amitav Acharya calls ‘Global IR’.",
keywords = "Basso Ostinato, International Relations Theory, Japanese Political Thought, Maruyama Masao, Security, Unsynthesizable",
author = "Felix R{\"o}sch and A. Watanabe",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1354066116656764",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "609--629",
journal = "European Journal of International Relations",
issn = "1354-0661",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Approaching the unsynthesizable in international politics: Giving substance to security discourses through basso ostinato?

AU - Rösch, Felix

AU - Watanabe, A.

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - This article addresses the question of how spatial difference manifests itself in International Relations discourses in an effort to theorize difference in international politics. In doing so, we focus on the concept of security in particular and demonstrate a paradox in its conceptualization. Despite the aspiration to capture global diversity, contemporary security discourses largely leave out the moment of subjectification in knowledge-construction. Rather, a form of subjectivity construction is promoted in these discourses, which is reliant on the other. In contrast, this article considers the unsynthesizable cognitive void between the self and the other through the work of the Japanese political scientist Maruyama Masao and his basso ostinato concept. By drafting it as a heuristic device to avoid the potential of determinism for which basso ostinato was criticized, we apply it to the concept of comprehensive security with the intention to demonstrate that ostensibly similar concepts can have different meanings in different times and spaces. In doing so, we aim to transcend the resulting misunderstandings that obstruct International Relations scholarship from contributing to what Amitav Acharya calls ‘Global IR’.

AB - This article addresses the question of how spatial difference manifests itself in International Relations discourses in an effort to theorize difference in international politics. In doing so, we focus on the concept of security in particular and demonstrate a paradox in its conceptualization. Despite the aspiration to capture global diversity, contemporary security discourses largely leave out the moment of subjectification in knowledge-construction. Rather, a form of subjectivity construction is promoted in these discourses, which is reliant on the other. In contrast, this article considers the unsynthesizable cognitive void between the self and the other through the work of the Japanese political scientist Maruyama Masao and his basso ostinato concept. By drafting it as a heuristic device to avoid the potential of determinism for which basso ostinato was criticized, we apply it to the concept of comprehensive security with the intention to demonstrate that ostensibly similar concepts can have different meanings in different times and spaces. In doing so, we aim to transcend the resulting misunderstandings that obstruct International Relations scholarship from contributing to what Amitav Acharya calls ‘Global IR’.

KW - Basso Ostinato

KW - International Relations Theory

KW - Japanese Political Thought

KW - Maruyama Masao

KW - Security

KW - Unsynthesizable

U2 - 10.1177/1354066116656764

DO - 10.1177/1354066116656764

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 609

EP - 629

JO - European Journal of International Relations

JF - European Journal of International Relations

SN - 1354-0661

IS - 3

ER -