Applying actor network theory and pragmatist thinking to the process of implementing scenarios

P. Davis, Neil Pyper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article considers the potential for actor network theory (ANT) to cast new light on scenarios, and how they can make change happen when they are implemented. The goal is to challenge the current dominance of cognitive Intuitive Logic theories, which we find variously wanting. ANT is applied in a hypothetical hierarchical situation composed of two central actors, the dominant planning network and the network to be planned. Their collision generates four hypothetical scenario outputs, only one of which is officially sanctioned, two which might cause instability or turn on the makers and one which needs the support that only ANT can provide. Our tracing of scenario moves needs, though, other pragmatist theory beyond ANT, as well as theories of objects' affect, if a more satisfactory theory of scenario implementation is to be forged.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)88-102
JournalInternational Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy
Volume10
Issue number2/3/4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Circuit theory
Planning
Scenarios
Actor-network theory

Bibliographical note

The full text is currently unavailable on the repository.

Keywords

  • actor network theory
  • ANT
  • affective theory
  • multiplicity
  • pragmatism
  • scenario implementation
  • scenarios.

Cite this

@article{6a016ab1e1d4433a9307ff5f37249419,
title = "Applying actor network theory and pragmatist thinking to the process of implementing scenarios",
abstract = "This article considers the potential for actor network theory (ANT) to cast new light on scenarios, and how they can make change happen when they are implemented. The goal is to challenge the current dominance of cognitive Intuitive Logic theories, which we find variously wanting. ANT is applied in a hypothetical hierarchical situation composed of two central actors, the dominant planning network and the network to be planned. Their collision generates four hypothetical scenario outputs, only one of which is officially sanctioned, two which might cause instability or turn on the makers and one which needs the support that only ANT can provide. Our tracing of scenario moves needs, though, other pragmatist theory beyond ANT, as well as theories of objects' affect, if a more satisfactory theory of scenario implementation is to be forged.",
keywords = "actor network theory, ANT, affective theory, multiplicity, pragmatism, scenario implementation, scenarios.",
author = "P. Davis and Neil Pyper",
note = "The full text is currently unavailable on the repository.",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1504/IJFIP.2015.074392",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "88--102",
journal = "International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy",
issn = "1740-2816",
publisher = "Inderscience",
number = "2/3/4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applying actor network theory and pragmatist thinking to the process of implementing scenarios

AU - Davis, P.

AU - Pyper, Neil

N1 - The full text is currently unavailable on the repository.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This article considers the potential for actor network theory (ANT) to cast new light on scenarios, and how they can make change happen when they are implemented. The goal is to challenge the current dominance of cognitive Intuitive Logic theories, which we find variously wanting. ANT is applied in a hypothetical hierarchical situation composed of two central actors, the dominant planning network and the network to be planned. Their collision generates four hypothetical scenario outputs, only one of which is officially sanctioned, two which might cause instability or turn on the makers and one which needs the support that only ANT can provide. Our tracing of scenario moves needs, though, other pragmatist theory beyond ANT, as well as theories of objects' affect, if a more satisfactory theory of scenario implementation is to be forged.

AB - This article considers the potential for actor network theory (ANT) to cast new light on scenarios, and how they can make change happen when they are implemented. The goal is to challenge the current dominance of cognitive Intuitive Logic theories, which we find variously wanting. ANT is applied in a hypothetical hierarchical situation composed of two central actors, the dominant planning network and the network to be planned. Their collision generates four hypothetical scenario outputs, only one of which is officially sanctioned, two which might cause instability or turn on the makers and one which needs the support that only ANT can provide. Our tracing of scenario moves needs, though, other pragmatist theory beyond ANT, as well as theories of objects' affect, if a more satisfactory theory of scenario implementation is to be forged.

KW - actor network theory

KW - ANT

KW - affective theory

KW - multiplicity

KW - pragmatism

KW - scenario implementation

KW - scenarios.

U2 - 10.1504/IJFIP.2015.074392

DO - 10.1504/IJFIP.2015.074392

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 88

EP - 102

JO - International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy

JF - International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy

SN - 1740-2816

IS - 2/3/4

ER -