Antecedents and consequences of chronic impulsive buying: Can impulsive buying be understood as dysfunctional self-regulation?

Mark Fenton-O'Creevy, Sally Dibb, Adrian Furnham

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

Researchers reach different conclusions about the functional or dysfunctional nature of impulsive buying behavior. Whilst many note the use of impulsive buying as a form of mood regulation, there is disagreement about whether this is functional or dysfunctional and the extent to which it causes financial harm. This paper draws on data from a UK national survey sample (N=109,472) to contribute to these debates. Study results suggest that impulsive buying is more common for those who have most need to regulate mood and who have the least effective emotion regulation strategies. This suggests that impulsive buying may be understood as a failure of self-regulation in relation to long term goals and as a strategy for mood regulation. Contrary to some prior claims in the retail management and marketing research literature, the study shows higher levels of impulsive buying to be associated with more adverse financial outcomes (which are not confined to the most extreme manifestations of the trait). Whilst ineffective emotion regulation is associated with higher propensity to buy impulsively, the findings also suggest that effective emotion regulation may to some extent mitigate the adverse consequences of the propensity to buy impulsively. The implications for ethical management, research, and policy are considered.
LanguageEnglish
Pages175–188
Number of pages13
JournalPsychology & Marketing
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 9 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Emotions
Impulsive Behavior
Marketing
Research
Self-Control
Self-regulation
Emotion regulation
Propensity
Management research
Surveys and Questionnaires
Marketing research
Retail marketing
Retail management
Sample survey

Bibliographical note

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Fenton-O'Creevy, M, Dibb, S & Furnham, A 2018, 'Antecedents and consequences of chronic impulsive buying: Can impulsive buying be understood as dysfunctional self-regulation?' Psychology & Marketing, vol 35, no. 3, pp. 175–188, which has been published in final form at https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mar.21078 . This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.

Keywords

  • emotion regulation
  • ethics
  • financial distress
  • impulsive buying
  • social marketing

Cite this

Antecedents and consequences of chronic impulsive buying: Can impulsive buying be understood as dysfunctional self-regulation? / Fenton-O'Creevy, Mark; Dibb, Sally; Furnham, Adrian.

In: Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 35, No. 3, 09.02.2018, p. 175–188.

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

@article{9271df9e6f7c452c8abd4e99948ee6b3,
title = "Antecedents and consequences of chronic impulsive buying: Can impulsive buying be understood as dysfunctional self-regulation?",
abstract = "Researchers reach different conclusions about the functional or dysfunctional nature of impulsive buying behavior. Whilst many note the use of impulsive buying as a form of mood regulation, there is disagreement about whether this is functional or dysfunctional and the extent to which it causes financial harm. This paper draws on data from a UK national survey sample (N=109,472) to contribute to these debates. Study results suggest that impulsive buying is more common for those who have most need to regulate mood and who have the least effective emotion regulation strategies. This suggests that impulsive buying may be understood as a failure of self-regulation in relation to long term goals and as a strategy for mood regulation. Contrary to some prior claims in the retail management and marketing research literature, the study shows higher levels of impulsive buying to be associated with more adverse financial outcomes (which are not confined to the most extreme manifestations of the trait). Whilst ineffective emotion regulation is associated with higher propensity to buy impulsively, the findings also suggest that effective emotion regulation may to some extent mitigate the adverse consequences of the propensity to buy impulsively. The implications for ethical management, research, and policy are considered.",
keywords = "emotion regulation, ethics, financial distress, impulsive buying, social marketing",
author = "Mark Fenton-O'Creevy and Sally Dibb and Adrian Furnham",
note = "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Fenton-O'Creevy, M, Dibb, S & Furnham, A 2018, 'Antecedents and consequences of chronic impulsive buying: Can impulsive buying be understood as dysfunctional self-regulation?' Psychology & Marketing, vol 35, no. 3, pp. 175–188, which has been published in final form at https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mar.21078 . This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1002/mar.21078",
volume = "35",
pages = "175–188",
journal = "Psychology & Marketing",
issn = "0742-6046",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Antecedents and consequences of chronic impulsive buying: Can impulsive buying be understood as dysfunctional self-regulation?

AU - Fenton-O'Creevy,Mark

AU - Dibb,Sally

AU - Furnham,Adrian

N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Fenton-O'Creevy, M, Dibb, S & Furnham, A 2018, 'Antecedents and consequences of chronic impulsive buying: Can impulsive buying be understood as dysfunctional self-regulation?' Psychology & Marketing, vol 35, no. 3, pp. 175–188, which has been published in final form at https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mar.21078 . This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.

PY - 2018/2/9

Y1 - 2018/2/9

N2 - Researchers reach different conclusions about the functional or dysfunctional nature of impulsive buying behavior. Whilst many note the use of impulsive buying as a form of mood regulation, there is disagreement about whether this is functional or dysfunctional and the extent to which it causes financial harm. This paper draws on data from a UK national survey sample (N=109,472) to contribute to these debates. Study results suggest that impulsive buying is more common for those who have most need to regulate mood and who have the least effective emotion regulation strategies. This suggests that impulsive buying may be understood as a failure of self-regulation in relation to long term goals and as a strategy for mood regulation. Contrary to some prior claims in the retail management and marketing research literature, the study shows higher levels of impulsive buying to be associated with more adverse financial outcomes (which are not confined to the most extreme manifestations of the trait). Whilst ineffective emotion regulation is associated with higher propensity to buy impulsively, the findings also suggest that effective emotion regulation may to some extent mitigate the adverse consequences of the propensity to buy impulsively. The implications for ethical management, research, and policy are considered.

AB - Researchers reach different conclusions about the functional or dysfunctional nature of impulsive buying behavior. Whilst many note the use of impulsive buying as a form of mood regulation, there is disagreement about whether this is functional or dysfunctional and the extent to which it causes financial harm. This paper draws on data from a UK national survey sample (N=109,472) to contribute to these debates. Study results suggest that impulsive buying is more common for those who have most need to regulate mood and who have the least effective emotion regulation strategies. This suggests that impulsive buying may be understood as a failure of self-regulation in relation to long term goals and as a strategy for mood regulation. Contrary to some prior claims in the retail management and marketing research literature, the study shows higher levels of impulsive buying to be associated with more adverse financial outcomes (which are not confined to the most extreme manifestations of the trait). Whilst ineffective emotion regulation is associated with higher propensity to buy impulsively, the findings also suggest that effective emotion regulation may to some extent mitigate the adverse consequences of the propensity to buy impulsively. The implications for ethical management, research, and policy are considered.

KW - emotion regulation

KW - ethics

KW - financial distress

KW - impulsive buying

KW - social marketing

U2 - 10.1002/mar.21078

DO - 10.1002/mar.21078

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 175

EP - 188

JO - Psychology & Marketing

T2 - Psychology & Marketing

JF - Psychology & Marketing

SN - 0742-6046

IS - 3

ER -