‘Anecdotal myths’: Tinbergen's influence on Harrod's growth theory

Albert Jolink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the history of economic theory, Harrod's transition from the explanation of business cycles in An Essay on the Trade Cycle (1936) to his well‐known growth theory in ‘An essay in dynamic theory’ (1939) has always been surrounded by some degree of speculation. One of the topics in that area of speculation concerns the (degree of) influence exerted by Tinbergen on the development of Harrod's growth theory during the 1936–9 period.

This paper argues that Tinbergen's influence on Harrod's work mainly took place on formal, mathematical, grounds, leaving methodological matters untouched. This matter is of some importance in understanding the success of what was initially considered by others as a ‘dynamic’ extension of the Keynesian research programme and later evolved, through the work of Tinbergen and Solow, into a neoclassical growth theory.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)434-449
Number of pages16
JournalEuropean Journal of the History of Economic Thought
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Growth theory
Speculation
Neoclassical growth
Business cycles
Economic theory
Research program
History of economics
History of Economics
Business Cycles
Research Program
Economic Theory

Keywords

  • dynamic economics
  • growth theory
  • Harrod
  • Tinbergen

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Cite this

‘Anecdotal myths’ : Tinbergen's influence on Harrod's growth theory. / Jolink, Albert.

In: European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 2, No. 2, 01.09.1995, p. 434-449.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{66f1c3077ed946acb4cd89a4a9331c31,
title = "‘Anecdotal myths’: Tinbergen's influence on Harrod's growth theory",
abstract = "In the history of economic theory, Harrod's transition from the explanation of business cycles in An Essay on the Trade Cycle (1936) to his well‐known growth theory in ‘An essay in dynamic theory’ (1939) has always been surrounded by some degree of speculation. One of the topics in that area of speculation concerns the (degree of) influence exerted by Tinbergen on the development of Harrod's growth theory during the 1936–9 period.This paper argues that Tinbergen's influence on Harrod's work mainly took place on formal, mathematical, grounds, leaving methodological matters untouched. This matter is of some importance in understanding the success of what was initially considered by others as a ‘dynamic’ extension of the Keynesian research programme and later evolved, through the work of Tinbergen and Solow, into a neoclassical growth theory.",
keywords = "dynamic economics, growth theory, Harrod, Tinbergen",
author = "Albert Jolink",
year = "1995",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/09672569508538577",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "434--449",
journal = "European Journal of the History of Economic Thought",
issn = "0967-2567",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘Anecdotal myths’

T2 - Tinbergen's influence on Harrod's growth theory

AU - Jolink, Albert

PY - 1995/9/1

Y1 - 1995/9/1

N2 - In the history of economic theory, Harrod's transition from the explanation of business cycles in An Essay on the Trade Cycle (1936) to his well‐known growth theory in ‘An essay in dynamic theory’ (1939) has always been surrounded by some degree of speculation. One of the topics in that area of speculation concerns the (degree of) influence exerted by Tinbergen on the development of Harrod's growth theory during the 1936–9 period.This paper argues that Tinbergen's influence on Harrod's work mainly took place on formal, mathematical, grounds, leaving methodological matters untouched. This matter is of some importance in understanding the success of what was initially considered by others as a ‘dynamic’ extension of the Keynesian research programme and later evolved, through the work of Tinbergen and Solow, into a neoclassical growth theory.

AB - In the history of economic theory, Harrod's transition from the explanation of business cycles in An Essay on the Trade Cycle (1936) to his well‐known growth theory in ‘An essay in dynamic theory’ (1939) has always been surrounded by some degree of speculation. One of the topics in that area of speculation concerns the (degree of) influence exerted by Tinbergen on the development of Harrod's growth theory during the 1936–9 period.This paper argues that Tinbergen's influence on Harrod's work mainly took place on formal, mathematical, grounds, leaving methodological matters untouched. This matter is of some importance in understanding the success of what was initially considered by others as a ‘dynamic’ extension of the Keynesian research programme and later evolved, through the work of Tinbergen and Solow, into a neoclassical growth theory.

KW - dynamic economics

KW - growth theory

KW - Harrod

KW - Tinbergen

U2 - 10.1080/09672569508538577

DO - 10.1080/09672569508538577

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 434

EP - 449

JO - European Journal of the History of Economic Thought

JF - European Journal of the History of Economic Thought

SN - 0967-2567

IS - 2

ER -