Analytical, experimental and numerical study of a graded honeycomb structure under in-plane impact load with low velocity

S.A. Galehdari, M. Kadkhodayan, S. Hadidi-Moud

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)
37 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Given the significance of energy absorption in various industries, light shock absorbers such as honeycomb structure under in-plane and out-of-plane loads have been in the core of attention. The purpose of this research is the analyses of graded honeycomb structure (GHS) behaviour under in-plane impact loading and its optimisation. Primarily, analytical equations for plateau stress and specific energy are represented, taking power hardening model (PHM) and elastic–perfectly plastic model (EPPM) into consideration. For the validation and comparison of acquired analytical equations, the energy absorption of a GHS made of five different aluminium grades is simulated in ABAQUS/CAE. In order to validate the numerical simulation method in ABAQUS, an experimental test has been conducted as the falling a weight with low velocity on a GHS. Numerical results retain an acceptable accordance with experimental ones with a 5.4% occurred error of reaction force. For a structure with a specific kinetic energy, the stress–strain diagram is achieved and compared with the analytical equations obtained. The maximum difference between the numerical and analytical plateau stresses for PHM is 10.58%. However, this value has been measured to be 38.78% for EPPM. In addition, the numerical value of absorbed energy is compared to that of analytical method for two material models. The maximum difference between the numerical and analytical absorbed energies for PHM model is 6.4%, while it retains the value of 48.08% for EPPM. Based on the conducted comparisons, the numerical and analytical results based on PHM are more congruent than EPPM results. Applying sequential quadratic programming method and genetic algorithm, the ratio of structure mass to the absorbed energy is minimised. According to the optimisation results, the structure capacity of absorbing energy increases by 18% compared to the primary model. Publisher Statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Crashworthiness on 11th March 2015, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13588265.2015.1018739
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)387-400
Number of pages14
JournalInternational Journal of Crashworthiness
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Honeycomb structures
energy
Hardening
Plastics
ABAQUS
Energy absorption
Shock absorbers
Crashworthiness
Computer aided engineering
Quadratic programming
Kinetic energy
Values
programming
Genetic algorithms

Keywords

  • Graded honeycomb structure
  • In-plane impact load
  • Power hardening
  • Plateau stress
  • Specific absorbed energy (SAE)
  • Optimisation

Cite this

Analytical, experimental and numerical study of a graded honeycomb structure under in-plane impact load with low velocity. / Galehdari, S.A.; Kadkhodayan, M.; Hadidi-Moud, S.

In: International Journal of Crashworthiness, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2015, p. 387-400.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{58ac4428a955463bb632e54ccb1dc3de,
title = "Analytical, experimental and numerical study of a graded honeycomb structure under in-plane impact load with low velocity",
abstract = "Given the significance of energy absorption in various industries, light shock absorbers such as honeycomb structure under in-plane and out-of-plane loads have been in the core of attention. The purpose of this research is the analyses of graded honeycomb structure (GHS) behaviour under in-plane impact loading and its optimisation. Primarily, analytical equations for plateau stress and specific energy are represented, taking power hardening model (PHM) and elastic–perfectly plastic model (EPPM) into consideration. For the validation and comparison of acquired analytical equations, the energy absorption of a GHS made of five different aluminium grades is simulated in ABAQUS/CAE. In order to validate the numerical simulation method in ABAQUS, an experimental test has been conducted as the falling a weight with low velocity on a GHS. Numerical results retain an acceptable accordance with experimental ones with a 5.4{\%} occurred error of reaction force. For a structure with a specific kinetic energy, the stress–strain diagram is achieved and compared with the analytical equations obtained. The maximum difference between the numerical and analytical plateau stresses for PHM is 10.58{\%}. However, this value has been measured to be 38.78{\%} for EPPM. In addition, the numerical value of absorbed energy is compared to that of analytical method for two material models. The maximum difference between the numerical and analytical absorbed energies for PHM model is 6.4{\%}, while it retains the value of 48.08{\%} for EPPM. Based on the conducted comparisons, the numerical and analytical results based on PHM are more congruent than EPPM results. Applying sequential quadratic programming method and genetic algorithm, the ratio of structure mass to the absorbed energy is minimised. According to the optimisation results, the structure capacity of absorbing energy increases by 18{\%} compared to the primary model. Publisher Statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Crashworthiness on 11th March 2015, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13588265.2015.1018739",
keywords = "Graded honeycomb structure, In-plane impact load, Power hardening, Plateau stress, Specific absorbed energy (SAE), Optimisation",
author = "S.A. Galehdari and M. Kadkhodayan and S. Hadidi-Moud",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/13588265.2015.1018739",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "387--400",
journal = "International Journal of Crashworthiness",
issn = "1358-8265",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analytical, experimental and numerical study of a graded honeycomb structure under in-plane impact load with low velocity

AU - Galehdari, S.A.

AU - Kadkhodayan, M.

AU - Hadidi-Moud, S.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Given the significance of energy absorption in various industries, light shock absorbers such as honeycomb structure under in-plane and out-of-plane loads have been in the core of attention. The purpose of this research is the analyses of graded honeycomb structure (GHS) behaviour under in-plane impact loading and its optimisation. Primarily, analytical equations for plateau stress and specific energy are represented, taking power hardening model (PHM) and elastic–perfectly plastic model (EPPM) into consideration. For the validation and comparison of acquired analytical equations, the energy absorption of a GHS made of five different aluminium grades is simulated in ABAQUS/CAE. In order to validate the numerical simulation method in ABAQUS, an experimental test has been conducted as the falling a weight with low velocity on a GHS. Numerical results retain an acceptable accordance with experimental ones with a 5.4% occurred error of reaction force. For a structure with a specific kinetic energy, the stress–strain diagram is achieved and compared with the analytical equations obtained. The maximum difference between the numerical and analytical plateau stresses for PHM is 10.58%. However, this value has been measured to be 38.78% for EPPM. In addition, the numerical value of absorbed energy is compared to that of analytical method for two material models. The maximum difference between the numerical and analytical absorbed energies for PHM model is 6.4%, while it retains the value of 48.08% for EPPM. Based on the conducted comparisons, the numerical and analytical results based on PHM are more congruent than EPPM results. Applying sequential quadratic programming method and genetic algorithm, the ratio of structure mass to the absorbed energy is minimised. According to the optimisation results, the structure capacity of absorbing energy increases by 18% compared to the primary model. Publisher Statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Crashworthiness on 11th March 2015, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13588265.2015.1018739

AB - Given the significance of energy absorption in various industries, light shock absorbers such as honeycomb structure under in-plane and out-of-plane loads have been in the core of attention. The purpose of this research is the analyses of graded honeycomb structure (GHS) behaviour under in-plane impact loading and its optimisation. Primarily, analytical equations for plateau stress and specific energy are represented, taking power hardening model (PHM) and elastic–perfectly plastic model (EPPM) into consideration. For the validation and comparison of acquired analytical equations, the energy absorption of a GHS made of five different aluminium grades is simulated in ABAQUS/CAE. In order to validate the numerical simulation method in ABAQUS, an experimental test has been conducted as the falling a weight with low velocity on a GHS. Numerical results retain an acceptable accordance with experimental ones with a 5.4% occurred error of reaction force. For a structure with a specific kinetic energy, the stress–strain diagram is achieved and compared with the analytical equations obtained. The maximum difference between the numerical and analytical plateau stresses for PHM is 10.58%. However, this value has been measured to be 38.78% for EPPM. In addition, the numerical value of absorbed energy is compared to that of analytical method for two material models. The maximum difference between the numerical and analytical absorbed energies for PHM model is 6.4%, while it retains the value of 48.08% for EPPM. Based on the conducted comparisons, the numerical and analytical results based on PHM are more congruent than EPPM results. Applying sequential quadratic programming method and genetic algorithm, the ratio of structure mass to the absorbed energy is minimised. According to the optimisation results, the structure capacity of absorbing energy increases by 18% compared to the primary model. Publisher Statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Crashworthiness on 11th March 2015, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13588265.2015.1018739

KW - Graded honeycomb structure

KW - In-plane impact load

KW - Power hardening

KW - Plateau stress

KW - Specific absorbed energy (SAE)

KW - Optimisation

U2 - 10.1080/13588265.2015.1018739

DO - 10.1080/13588265.2015.1018739

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 387

EP - 400

JO - International Journal of Crashworthiness

JF - International Journal of Crashworthiness

SN - 1358-8265

IS - 4

ER -