Abstract
Life& Times of Michael K aims to portray the violence of subjectivity and thenegation upon which representation is predicated, pointing to the ethical importance of literature. This paper asserts that, in Coetzee's drive to represent the writer’s encounter with the other, he exercises the verysame powers of negation and self-constituting subjectivity engaged withthematically in the novel. The paper suggests that the theme of Life &Times of Michael K – the necessary paradox of representation resultingfrom the irreducible nature of alterity – cannot be read simply as the finalword on the novel’s ethics. The problematic meta-representational themeof the novel, and the ethical position of the work, is investigated with reference to the work of Emmanuel Levinas, Maurice Blanchot andJean-Francois Lyotard.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 87-106 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Journal of Commonwealth Literature |
Volume | 38 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2003 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- alterity
- ethics
- Representation
- Levinas
- Lyotard
- Blanchot
- J.M. Coetzee
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Literature and Literary Theory