TY - JOUR
T1 - An improved method for calculating toxicity-based pollutant loads
T2 - Part 2. Application to contaminants discharged to the Great Barrier Reef, Queensland, Australia
AU - Smith, Rachael A.
AU - Warne, Michael St. John
AU - Mengersen, Kerrie
AU - Turner, Ryan D. R.
PY - 2016/10/24
Y1 - 2016/10/24
N2 - Pollutant loads are widely used to set pollution reduction targets and assess regulatory compliance for the protection of receiving waterbodies. However, when a pollutant load is comprised of a mixture of chemicals, reducing the overall load (mass) will not necessarily reduce the toxicity by a similar amount. This can be overcome by setting targets based on toxicity-based loads (toxic loads), where the load is modified according to the relative toxicity (expressed as toxic equivalency factors— TEFs) of each toxicant. Here we present the second paper of a two-part series in which a case study is used to demonstrate the application of the toxic load method proposed in Part 1. The toxic load method converts a pollutant load, comprised of multiple chemicals, to a toxicity-based load (toxic load), using a modified TEF approach. The modified approach is based upon the cumulative distribution of relative potency (ReP) estimates of multiple species, and is further improvedon previously published TEF methods with the inclusion of two tests to select the percentile of the cumulative ReP distribution which generate TLs: that align with an independent mixture method (test for environmental relevance); and are independent of the reference chemical used (test for robustness). Here, the TL method is applied to mixtures of pesticides that are discharged from agricultural land to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) in order to test its utility. In this case study, the most environmentally relevant and robust TLs were generated using the 75th percentile of the ReP cumulative distribution. The results demonstrate that it is essential to develop pollution reduction targets based on toxic loads, and making progress to meeting them will lead to a commensurate reduction in toxic effects caused by toxicants in waters of the GBR.
AB - Pollutant loads are widely used to set pollution reduction targets and assess regulatory compliance for the protection of receiving waterbodies. However, when a pollutant load is comprised of a mixture of chemicals, reducing the overall load (mass) will not necessarily reduce the toxicity by a similar amount. This can be overcome by setting targets based on toxicity-based loads (toxic loads), where the load is modified according to the relative toxicity (expressed as toxic equivalency factors— TEFs) of each toxicant. Here we present the second paper of a two-part series in which a case study is used to demonstrate the application of the toxic load method proposed in Part 1. The toxic load method converts a pollutant load, comprised of multiple chemicals, to a toxicity-based load (toxic load), using a modified TEF approach. The modified approach is based upon the cumulative distribution of relative potency (ReP) estimates of multiple species, and is further improvedon previously published TEF methods with the inclusion of two tests to select the percentile of the cumulative ReP distribution which generate TLs: that align with an independent mixture method (test for environmental relevance); and are independent of the reference chemical used (test for robustness). Here, the TL method is applied to mixtures of pesticides that are discharged from agricultural land to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) in order to test its utility. In this case study, the most environmentally relevant and robust TLs were generated using the 75th percentile of the ReP cumulative distribution. The results demonstrate that it is essential to develop pollution reduction targets based on toxic loads, and making progress to meeting them will lead to a commensurate reduction in toxic effects caused by toxicants in waters of the GBR.
KW - Pollutant Loads
KW - Great Barrier Reef
KW - Photosystem II Herbicides
KW - Toxic Equivalency Factor
KW - Relative Potency
U2 - 10.1002/ieam.1860
DO - 10.1002/ieam.1860
M3 - Article
SN - 1551-3777
SN - 1551-3793
VL - 13
SP - 754
EP - 764
JO - Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
JF - Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
IS - 4
ER -