An Extension of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) for use in Open Systems

Don Harris, Wen-Chin Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)
57 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS), based upon Reason's model of human error in an organisational context, is currently the most widely used human factors accident analysis framework. However, it has been criticised for merely categorising accident data rather than analysing it. Previous research has established statistical associations between the levels and categories within HFACS but has not specified a mechanism by which one category influences subsequent behaviour. This paper extends the approach in two ways. Using the categories of control flaws derived from Leveson's Systems–Theoretical Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) approach, it describes the mechanisms by which categories within HFACS are associated with other categories lower in the organisational hierarchy. It also provides a mechanism by which active failures can promulgate across organisations. The revised methodology HFACS-STAMP is illustrated using the case study of the Uberlingen mid-air collision on 1 July 2002.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)108-128
Number of pages21
JournalTheoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jun 2010

Fingerprint

open system
Open systems
Factor analysis
Human engineering
factor analysis
Accidents
accident
human error
air
Defects
methodology
Air

Keywords

  • HFACS
  • STAMP
  • Accident analysis
  • Error
  • Open systems

Cite this

An Extension of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) for use in Open Systems. / Harris, Don; Li, Wen-Chin.

In: Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, Vol. 12, No. 2, 15.06.2010, p. 108-128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0891b66fadc2414bb58c496566eeeae4,
title = "An Extension of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) for use in Open Systems",
abstract = "The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS), based upon Reason's model of human error in an organisational context, is currently the most widely used human factors accident analysis framework. However, it has been criticised for merely categorising accident data rather than analysing it. Previous research has established statistical associations between the levels and categories within HFACS but has not specified a mechanism by which one category influences subsequent behaviour. This paper extends the approach in two ways. Using the categories of control flaws derived from Leveson's Systems–Theoretical Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) approach, it describes the mechanisms by which categories within HFACS are associated with other categories lower in the organisational hierarchy. It also provides a mechanism by which active failures can promulgate across organisations. The revised methodology HFACS-STAMP is illustrated using the case study of the Uberlingen mid-air collision on 1 July 2002.",
keywords = "HFACS, STAMP, Accident analysis, Error, Open systems",
author = "Don Harris and Wen-Chin Li",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1080/14639220903536559",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "108--128",
journal = "Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science",
issn = "1463-922X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Extension of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) for use in Open Systems

AU - Harris, Don

AU - Li, Wen-Chin

PY - 2010/6/15

Y1 - 2010/6/15

N2 - The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS), based upon Reason's model of human error in an organisational context, is currently the most widely used human factors accident analysis framework. However, it has been criticised for merely categorising accident data rather than analysing it. Previous research has established statistical associations between the levels and categories within HFACS but has not specified a mechanism by which one category influences subsequent behaviour. This paper extends the approach in two ways. Using the categories of control flaws derived from Leveson's Systems–Theoretical Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) approach, it describes the mechanisms by which categories within HFACS are associated with other categories lower in the organisational hierarchy. It also provides a mechanism by which active failures can promulgate across organisations. The revised methodology HFACS-STAMP is illustrated using the case study of the Uberlingen mid-air collision on 1 July 2002.

AB - The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System (HFACS), based upon Reason's model of human error in an organisational context, is currently the most widely used human factors accident analysis framework. However, it has been criticised for merely categorising accident data rather than analysing it. Previous research has established statistical associations between the levels and categories within HFACS but has not specified a mechanism by which one category influences subsequent behaviour. This paper extends the approach in two ways. Using the categories of control flaws derived from Leveson's Systems–Theoretical Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) approach, it describes the mechanisms by which categories within HFACS are associated with other categories lower in the organisational hierarchy. It also provides a mechanism by which active failures can promulgate across organisations. The revised methodology HFACS-STAMP is illustrated using the case study of the Uberlingen mid-air collision on 1 July 2002.

KW - HFACS

KW - STAMP

KW - Accident analysis

KW - Error

KW - Open systems

U2 - 10.1080/14639220903536559

DO - 10.1080/14639220903536559

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 108

EP - 128

JO - Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science

JF - Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science

SN - 1463-922X

IS - 2

ER -