An examination of the construct validity of the Generalized Pliance Questionnaire

Daniel Waldeck; Luca Pancani; Ian  Tyndall

doi:10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.12.003

An examination of the construct validity of the Generalized Pliance Questionnaire

Daniel Waldeck, Luca Pancani, Ian Tyndall

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

320 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Generalized Pliance Questionnaire (GPQ) was originally validated against measures of psychological flexibility and psychological distress. However, measures which have substantial conceptual overlap with the GPQ (e.g., the Need to Belong Scale [NTBS], Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale [BFNE]) were not examined. The present study seeks to investigate the construct validity of the GPQ-9. As expected, data from a survey of 272 participants indicated significant large correlations between the GPQ-9 and NTBS and BFNE respectively. The results of a confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the unidimensional structure of the GPQ-9. A structural equation model revealed that the BFNE (and not the GPQ-9 or NTBS) was significantly associated with psychological flexibility and psychological distress. Implications of these tentative preliminary findings suggest that the BFNE and GPQ-9 should be used in different contexts when applied to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) research.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	50-54
Number of pages	5
Journal	Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Volume	11
Early online date	11 Dec 2018
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.12.003
Publication status	Published - Jan 2019

Bibliographical note

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, [[11] (2019)] DOI: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.12.003

© 2019, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Keywords

Acceptance and commitment therapy
Construct validity
Generalized pliance
Relational frame theory
Rule-governed behavior

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Health(social science)
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Applied Psychology
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Behavioral Neuroscience

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.12.003

Post-PrintAccepted author manuscript, 1.06 MBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{64c632db089146c98d58f081be1bed77,

title = "An examination of the construct validity of the Generalized Pliance Questionnaire",

abstract = "The Generalized Pliance Questionnaire (GPQ) was originally validated against measures of psychological flexibility and psychological distress. However, measures which have substantial conceptual overlap with the GPQ (e.g., the Need to Belong Scale [NTBS], Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale [BFNE]) were not examined. The present study seeks to investigate the construct validity of the GPQ-9. As expected, data from a survey of 272 participants indicated significant large correlations between the GPQ-9 and NTBS and BFNE respectively. The results of a confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the unidimensional structure of the GPQ-9. A structural equation model revealed that the BFNE (and not the GPQ-9 or NTBS) was significantly associated with psychological flexibility and psychological distress. Implications of these tentative preliminary findings suggest that the BFNE and GPQ-9 should be used in different contexts when applied to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) research.",

keywords = "Acceptance and commitment therapy, Construct validity, Generalized pliance, Relational frame theory, Rule-governed behavior",

author = "Daniel Waldeck and Luca Pancani and Ian Tyndall",

note = "NOTICE: this is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, [[11] (2019)] DOI: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.12.003 {\textcopyright} 2019, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ",

year = "2019",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.12.003",

language = "English",

volume = "11",

pages = "50--54",

journal = "Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science",

issn = "2212-1455",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An examination of the construct validity of the Generalized Pliance Questionnaire

AU - Waldeck, Daniel

AU - Pancani, Luca

AU - Tyndall, Ian

N1 - NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, [[11] (2019)] DOI: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.12.003 © 2019, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - The Generalized Pliance Questionnaire (GPQ) was originally validated against measures of psychological flexibility and psychological distress. However, measures which have substantial conceptual overlap with the GPQ (e.g., the Need to Belong Scale [NTBS], Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale [BFNE]) were not examined. The present study seeks to investigate the construct validity of the GPQ-9. As expected, data from a survey of 272 participants indicated significant large correlations between the GPQ-9 and NTBS and BFNE respectively. The results of a confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the unidimensional structure of the GPQ-9. A structural equation model revealed that the BFNE (and not the GPQ-9 or NTBS) was significantly associated with psychological flexibility and psychological distress. Implications of these tentative preliminary findings suggest that the BFNE and GPQ-9 should be used in different contexts when applied to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) research.

AB - The Generalized Pliance Questionnaire (GPQ) was originally validated against measures of psychological flexibility and psychological distress. However, measures which have substantial conceptual overlap with the GPQ (e.g., the Need to Belong Scale [NTBS], Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale [BFNE]) were not examined. The present study seeks to investigate the construct validity of the GPQ-9. As expected, data from a survey of 272 participants indicated significant large correlations between the GPQ-9 and NTBS and BFNE respectively. The results of a confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the unidimensional structure of the GPQ-9. A structural equation model revealed that the BFNE (and not the GPQ-9 or NTBS) was significantly associated with psychological flexibility and psychological distress. Implications of these tentative preliminary findings suggest that the BFNE and GPQ-9 should be used in different contexts when applied to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) research.

KW - Acceptance and commitment therapy

KW - Construct validity

KW - Generalized pliance

KW - Relational frame theory

KW - Rule-governed behavior

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85058400754

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.12.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jcbs.2018.12.003

M3 - Article

SN - 2212-1455

VL - 11

SP - 50

EP - 54

JO - Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

JF - Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

ER -

An examination of the construct validity of the Generalized Pliance Questionnaire

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this