An ERP assessment of hemispheric projections in foveal and extrafoveal word recognition

Timothy R Jordan, Giorgio Fuggetta, Kevin B Paterson, Stoyan Kurtev, Mengyun Xu

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    BACKGROUND: The existence and function of unilateral hemispheric projections within foveal vision may substantially affect foveal word recognition. The purpose of this research was to reveal these projections and determine their functionality.

    METHODOLOGY: Single words (and pseudowords) were presented to the left or right of fixation, entirely within either foveal or extrafoveal vision. To maximize the likelihood of unilateral projections for foveal displays, stimuli in foveal vision were presented away from the midline. The processing of stimuli in each location was assessed by combining behavioural measures (reaction times, accuracy) with on-line monitoring of hemispheric activity using event-related potentials recorded over each hemisphere, and carefully-controlled presentation procedures using an eye-tracker linked to a fixation-contingent display.

    PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Event-related potentials 100-150 ms and 150-200 ms after stimulus onset indicated that stimuli in extrafoveal and foveal locations were projected unilaterally to the hemisphere contralateral to the presentation hemifield with no concurrent projection to the ipsilateral hemisphere. These effects were similar for words and pseudowords, suggesting this early division occurred before word recognition. Indeed, event-related potentials revealed differences between words and pseudowords 300-350 ms after stimulus onset, for foveal and extrafoveal locations, indicating that word recognition had now occurred. However, these later event-related potentials also revealed that the hemispheric division observed previously was no longer present for foveal locations but remained for extrafoveal locations. These findings closely matched the behavioural finding that foveal locations produced similar performance each side of fixation but extrafoveal locations produced left-right asymmetries.

    CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that an initial division in unilateral hemispheric projections occurs in foveal vision away from the midline but is not apparent, or functional, when foveal word recognition actually occurs. In contrast, the division in unilateral hemispheric projections that occurs in extrafoveal locations is still apparent, and is functional, when extrafoveal word recognition takes place.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere23957
    Pages (from-to)1-9
    Number of pages10
    JournalPLoS ONE
    Volume6
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    Enterprise resource planning
    Evoked Potentials
    Reaction Time
    eyes
    Display devices
    monitoring
    Research
    Monitoring
    Processing

    Keywords

    • Adolescent
    • Adult
    • Behavior
    • Brain Mapping
    • Electroencephalography
    • Evoked Potentials
    • Fixation, Ocular
    • Fovea Centralis
    • Functional Laterality
    • Humans
    • Pattern Recognition, Visual
    • Reaction Time
    • Reading
    • Reproducibility of Results
    • Research Design
    • Time Factors
    • Vision, Ocular
    • Visual Fields
    • Journal Article

    Cite this

    Jordan, T. R., Fuggetta, G., Paterson, K. B., Kurtev, S., & Xu, M. (2011). An ERP assessment of hemispheric projections in foveal and extrafoveal word recognition. PLoS ONE, 6(9), 1-9. [e23957]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023957

    An ERP assessment of hemispheric projections in foveal and extrafoveal word recognition. / Jordan, Timothy R; Fuggetta, Giorgio; Paterson, Kevin B; Kurtev, Stoyan; Xu, Mengyun.

    In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 6, No. 9, e23957, 2011, p. 1-9.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Jordan, TR, Fuggetta, G, Paterson, KB, Kurtev, S & Xu, M 2011, 'An ERP assessment of hemispheric projections in foveal and extrafoveal word recognition' PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 9, e23957, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023957
    Jordan, Timothy R ; Fuggetta, Giorgio ; Paterson, Kevin B ; Kurtev, Stoyan ; Xu, Mengyun. / An ERP assessment of hemispheric projections in foveal and extrafoveal word recognition. In: PLoS ONE. 2011 ; Vol. 6, No. 9. pp. 1-9.
    @article{2681bb3557e54e25b00ce4fcfd14bf3f,
    title = "An ERP assessment of hemispheric projections in foveal and extrafoveal word recognition",
    abstract = "BACKGROUND: The existence and function of unilateral hemispheric projections within foveal vision may substantially affect foveal word recognition. The purpose of this research was to reveal these projections and determine their functionality.METHODOLOGY: Single words (and pseudowords) were presented to the left or right of fixation, entirely within either foveal or extrafoveal vision. To maximize the likelihood of unilateral projections for foveal displays, stimuli in foveal vision were presented away from the midline. The processing of stimuli in each location was assessed by combining behavioural measures (reaction times, accuracy) with on-line monitoring of hemispheric activity using event-related potentials recorded over each hemisphere, and carefully-controlled presentation procedures using an eye-tracker linked to a fixation-contingent display.PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Event-related potentials 100-150 ms and 150-200 ms after stimulus onset indicated that stimuli in extrafoveal and foveal locations were projected unilaterally to the hemisphere contralateral to the presentation hemifield with no concurrent projection to the ipsilateral hemisphere. These effects were similar for words and pseudowords, suggesting this early division occurred before word recognition. Indeed, event-related potentials revealed differences between words and pseudowords 300-350 ms after stimulus onset, for foveal and extrafoveal locations, indicating that word recognition had now occurred. However, these later event-related potentials also revealed that the hemispheric division observed previously was no longer present for foveal locations but remained for extrafoveal locations. These findings closely matched the behavioural finding that foveal locations produced similar performance each side of fixation but extrafoveal locations produced left-right asymmetries.CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that an initial division in unilateral hemispheric projections occurs in foveal vision away from the midline but is not apparent, or functional, when foveal word recognition actually occurs. In contrast, the division in unilateral hemispheric projections that occurs in extrafoveal locations is still apparent, and is functional, when extrafoveal word recognition takes place.",
    keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Behavior, Brain Mapping, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Fixation, Ocular, Fovea Centralis, Functional Laterality, Humans, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reaction Time, Reading, Reproducibility of Results, Research Design, Time Factors, Vision, Ocular, Visual Fields, Journal Article",
    author = "Jordan, {Timothy R} and Giorgio Fuggetta and Paterson, {Kevin B} and Stoyan Kurtev and Mengyun Xu",
    year = "2011",
    doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0023957",
    language = "English",
    volume = "6",
    pages = "1--9",
    journal = "PLoS ONE",
    issn = "1932-6203",
    publisher = "Public Library of Science",
    number = "9",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - An ERP assessment of hemispheric projections in foveal and extrafoveal word recognition

    AU - Jordan, Timothy R

    AU - Fuggetta, Giorgio

    AU - Paterson, Kevin B

    AU - Kurtev, Stoyan

    AU - Xu, Mengyun

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - BACKGROUND: The existence and function of unilateral hemispheric projections within foveal vision may substantially affect foveal word recognition. The purpose of this research was to reveal these projections and determine their functionality.METHODOLOGY: Single words (and pseudowords) were presented to the left or right of fixation, entirely within either foveal or extrafoveal vision. To maximize the likelihood of unilateral projections for foveal displays, stimuli in foveal vision were presented away from the midline. The processing of stimuli in each location was assessed by combining behavioural measures (reaction times, accuracy) with on-line monitoring of hemispheric activity using event-related potentials recorded over each hemisphere, and carefully-controlled presentation procedures using an eye-tracker linked to a fixation-contingent display.PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Event-related potentials 100-150 ms and 150-200 ms after stimulus onset indicated that stimuli in extrafoveal and foveal locations were projected unilaterally to the hemisphere contralateral to the presentation hemifield with no concurrent projection to the ipsilateral hemisphere. These effects were similar for words and pseudowords, suggesting this early division occurred before word recognition. Indeed, event-related potentials revealed differences between words and pseudowords 300-350 ms after stimulus onset, for foveal and extrafoveal locations, indicating that word recognition had now occurred. However, these later event-related potentials also revealed that the hemispheric division observed previously was no longer present for foveal locations but remained for extrafoveal locations. These findings closely matched the behavioural finding that foveal locations produced similar performance each side of fixation but extrafoveal locations produced left-right asymmetries.CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that an initial division in unilateral hemispheric projections occurs in foveal vision away from the midline but is not apparent, or functional, when foveal word recognition actually occurs. In contrast, the division in unilateral hemispheric projections that occurs in extrafoveal locations is still apparent, and is functional, when extrafoveal word recognition takes place.

    AB - BACKGROUND: The existence and function of unilateral hemispheric projections within foveal vision may substantially affect foveal word recognition. The purpose of this research was to reveal these projections and determine their functionality.METHODOLOGY: Single words (and pseudowords) were presented to the left or right of fixation, entirely within either foveal or extrafoveal vision. To maximize the likelihood of unilateral projections for foveal displays, stimuli in foveal vision were presented away from the midline. The processing of stimuli in each location was assessed by combining behavioural measures (reaction times, accuracy) with on-line monitoring of hemispheric activity using event-related potentials recorded over each hemisphere, and carefully-controlled presentation procedures using an eye-tracker linked to a fixation-contingent display.PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Event-related potentials 100-150 ms and 150-200 ms after stimulus onset indicated that stimuli in extrafoveal and foveal locations were projected unilaterally to the hemisphere contralateral to the presentation hemifield with no concurrent projection to the ipsilateral hemisphere. These effects were similar for words and pseudowords, suggesting this early division occurred before word recognition. Indeed, event-related potentials revealed differences between words and pseudowords 300-350 ms after stimulus onset, for foveal and extrafoveal locations, indicating that word recognition had now occurred. However, these later event-related potentials also revealed that the hemispheric division observed previously was no longer present for foveal locations but remained for extrafoveal locations. These findings closely matched the behavioural finding that foveal locations produced similar performance each side of fixation but extrafoveal locations produced left-right asymmetries.CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that an initial division in unilateral hemispheric projections occurs in foveal vision away from the midline but is not apparent, or functional, when foveal word recognition actually occurs. In contrast, the division in unilateral hemispheric projections that occurs in extrafoveal locations is still apparent, and is functional, when extrafoveal word recognition takes place.

    KW - Adolescent

    KW - Adult

    KW - Behavior

    KW - Brain Mapping

    KW - Electroencephalography

    KW - Evoked Potentials

    KW - Fixation, Ocular

    KW - Fovea Centralis

    KW - Functional Laterality

    KW - Humans

    KW - Pattern Recognition, Visual

    KW - Reaction Time

    KW - Reading

    KW - Reproducibility of Results

    KW - Research Design

    KW - Time Factors

    KW - Vision, Ocular

    KW - Visual Fields

    KW - Journal Article

    U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0023957

    DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0023957

    M3 - Article

    VL - 6

    SP - 1

    EP - 9

    JO - PLoS ONE

    JF - PLoS ONE

    SN - 1932-6203

    IS - 9

    M1 - e23957

    ER -