An analysis of the impact of negative CSR ‘forced labour’ parameter on the profitability of supply chain contracts

Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji, Khalid Hafeez, Ahmad Jafarnejad, Ali Rezayar

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    17 Citations (Scopus)
    148 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This paper provides a mathematical model to analyse the impact of a negative corporate social responsibility (CSR) parameter that for ‘forced labour’, on supply chain profitability based on coordination contracts. Four types of supply chain coordination contract are developed and benchmarked against set performance indices employing sensitivity analysis and non-linear optimization techniques. Nash ‘static’ and Stackelberg ‘dynamic’ models are employed to represent the ‘gameplay’ between the ‘manufacturer’ and ‘retailer’ in a supply chain. The key inputs are average demand and ‘forced labour’ ratios, whereas key performance indicators are advertising, inventory and pricing costs.

    Our results indicate that by reducing the proportion of ‘forced labour’ for both members of the supply chain, the overall profitability increases in a Nash static gaming context. However, the contractual relationships in a Stackelberg dynamic situation provide a different picture. Here, if the ‘retailer’ assumes the leadership role, cost-sharing contracts increase the profitability for both partners. However, if the ‘manufacturer’ assumes the leader, the profit-sharing contract leads to the highest overall profit. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis confirms that an ideal situation is one in which the ‘forced labour’ ratio approaches ‘zero’, where the profitability of the retailer is usually higher than that of the manufacturer. Previous researchers have used ‘survey-based’ methods to develop proportional or ‘mediating’ relationships to measure the impact of CSR on supply chain profitability. This paper addresses the associated gap by providing a game theoretic-based non-linear mathematical model to assess the direct impact of negative CSR on supply chain profitability and benchmarks the performance of different supply chain contracts.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number122274
    Pages (from-to)(In-Press)
    JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
    Volume271
    Early online date20 Jun 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 20 Oct 2020

    Keywords

    • Corporate social responsibility
    • Supply chain coordination
    • Game theory
    • Nash and Stackelberg equilibrium

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'An analysis of the impact of negative CSR ‘forced labour’ parameter on the profitability of supply chain contracts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this