Altering visual feedback conditions impacts on postural sway performance in children after controlling for body mass index and habitual physical activity

Michael J. Duncan, Elizabeth Bryant, Michael J. Price, Sam Oxford, Emma L.J. Eyre, M. Hill

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)
    135 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This study examined postural sway in children in eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC) conditions, controlling for Body Mass Index (BMI) and physical activity (PA). Sixty two children (aged 8-11years) underwent sway assessment using computerised posturography from which 95% ellipse sway area, anterior/posterior (AP) sway, medial/lateral (ML) sway displacement and sway velocity were assessed. Six trials were performed alternatively in EO and EC. BMI (kg/m2) was determined from height and mass. PA was determined using sealed pedometry. AP amplitude (P= .038), ML amplitude (P= .001), 95% ellipse (P= .0001) and sway velocity (P= .012) were higher in EC compared to EO conditions. BMI and PA were not significant as covariates. None of the sway variables were significantly related to PA. However, sway velocity during EO (P= .0001) and EC (P= .0001) was significantly related to BMI. These results indicate that sway is poorer when vision is removed, that BMI influences sway velocity but pedometer assessed PA was not associated with postural sway.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)267-279
    JournalJournal of Motor Learning and Development
    Volume5
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 31 Dec 2017

    Bibliographical note

    This paper has been accepted in Journal of Motor Learning and Development
    as accepted for publication

    Keywords

    • Sway
    • Obesity
    • Physical Activity
    • Postural Control

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Altering visual feedback conditions impacts on postural sway performance in children after controlling for body mass index and habitual physical activity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this