Along the Road: R&D, Society and Space

Nick Henry, Doreen Massey, David Wield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite an expanding critique, the idea of the linear model of R & D (and the inequalities implicit within it) still holds sway in what Rosenberg (Science and Public Policy, 1991, 18, 335–346) has termed “our roadmap of the science/technology relationship”. In constructing a new map, we must first recognize R & D as having a social and spatial, as well as a technical, content. In the paper this approach is used to analyse four case studies of the R & D process. In each case, the company conceptualises the R & D process in terms of linearity but it doesn't work quite like that in practice. The variations are not major, but neither are they insignificant. Moreover, they do seem to be associated with social and spatial modifications of the inequalities inherent, or potentially present, in the pure linear model. Maybe if these companies could think less in terms of the linear model, and stop measuring their actual, complex practice against it and thereby conceiving of that complexity as in some way a deficiency, then further positive moves away from the linear model could be made.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)707-726
Number of pages20
JournalResearch Policy
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1995

Fingerprint

Industry
Roads
Roadmap
Science policy
Linearity
Public policy

Cite this

Along the Road: R&D, Society and Space. / Henry, Nick; Massey, Doreen ; Wield, David.

In: Research Policy, Vol. 24, No. 5, 09.1995, p. 707-726.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Henry, Nick ; Massey, Doreen ; Wield, David. / Along the Road: R&D, Society and Space. In: Research Policy. 1995 ; Vol. 24, No. 5. pp. 707-726.
@article{4aee1b1164404757b6bd1b3e7b234ee1,
title = "Along the Road: R&D, Society and Space",
abstract = "Despite an expanding critique, the idea of the linear model of R & D (and the inequalities implicit within it) still holds sway in what Rosenberg (Science and Public Policy, 1991, 18, 335–346) has termed “our roadmap of the science/technology relationship”. In constructing a new map, we must first recognize R & D as having a social and spatial, as well as a technical, content. In the paper this approach is used to analyse four case studies of the R & D process. In each case, the company conceptualises the R & D process in terms of linearity but it doesn't work quite like that in practice. The variations are not major, but neither are they insignificant. Moreover, they do seem to be associated with social and spatial modifications of the inequalities inherent, or potentially present, in the pure linear model. Maybe if these companies could think less in terms of the linear model, and stop measuring their actual, complex practice against it and thereby conceiving of that complexity as in some way a deficiency, then further positive moves away from the linear model could be made.",
author = "Nick Henry and Doreen Massey and David Wield",
year = "1995",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/0048-7333(94)00793-7",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "707--726",
journal = "Research Policy",
issn = "0048-7333",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Along the Road: R&D, Society and Space

AU - Henry, Nick

AU - Massey, Doreen

AU - Wield, David

PY - 1995/9

Y1 - 1995/9

N2 - Despite an expanding critique, the idea of the linear model of R & D (and the inequalities implicit within it) still holds sway in what Rosenberg (Science and Public Policy, 1991, 18, 335–346) has termed “our roadmap of the science/technology relationship”. In constructing a new map, we must first recognize R & D as having a social and spatial, as well as a technical, content. In the paper this approach is used to analyse four case studies of the R & D process. In each case, the company conceptualises the R & D process in terms of linearity but it doesn't work quite like that in practice. The variations are not major, but neither are they insignificant. Moreover, they do seem to be associated with social and spatial modifications of the inequalities inherent, or potentially present, in the pure linear model. Maybe if these companies could think less in terms of the linear model, and stop measuring their actual, complex practice against it and thereby conceiving of that complexity as in some way a deficiency, then further positive moves away from the linear model could be made.

AB - Despite an expanding critique, the idea of the linear model of R & D (and the inequalities implicit within it) still holds sway in what Rosenberg (Science and Public Policy, 1991, 18, 335–346) has termed “our roadmap of the science/technology relationship”. In constructing a new map, we must first recognize R & D as having a social and spatial, as well as a technical, content. In the paper this approach is used to analyse four case studies of the R & D process. In each case, the company conceptualises the R & D process in terms of linearity but it doesn't work quite like that in practice. The variations are not major, but neither are they insignificant. Moreover, they do seem to be associated with social and spatial modifications of the inequalities inherent, or potentially present, in the pure linear model. Maybe if these companies could think less in terms of the linear model, and stop measuring their actual, complex practice against it and thereby conceiving of that complexity as in some way a deficiency, then further positive moves away from the linear model could be made.

U2 - 10.1016/0048-7333(94)00793-7

DO - 10.1016/0048-7333(94)00793-7

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 707

EP - 726

JO - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

SN - 0048-7333

IS - 5

ER -