Agroforestry policy development in England: a question of knowledge transference

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

74 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Agroecology as a concept for reimagining food systems has grown in popularity and is now used in several food and agriculture policy frameworks around the world. While there is a significant body of research around agroecology, its origins, applications, and as a much-needed transition pathway to sustainable food systems, there is limited understanding on how agroecology may be situated within policy frameworks and how agroecological knowledge may be used to inform decision-making. In England, as the Government’s post-Brexit subsidy scheme – the Environmental Land Management Scheme (ELMs) – is developed, various sectoral actors are employing different frameworks in attempts to deliver multiple objectives around land use, food, agriculture and biodiversity. This paper reviews 3 influential frameworks (Sustainable Development Goals, Ecosystem Services, FAO’s 10 Principles of Agroecology) and assesses the degree to which they contribute to the development of agroecologically-oriented policy in England. With a specific focus on agroforestry as an exemplar agroecological approach, this paper contributes to the limited policy literature on agroecology. Using thematic and content analysis, nine policy documents pertaining to agroforestry were reviewed, resulting in a ‘degree of embeddedness’ being assigned to each framework. Results showed that all three frameworks had a low degree of embeddedness in policy; in other words, none of the frameworks considered have been coherently integrated into current policy documents. With such urgency to halt environmental degradation, biodiversity loss, climate breakdown and food insecurity, the apparent lack of knowledge transfer within critical policy documents is noteworthy. This paper concludes with a set of broad policy recommendations, applicable at both the EU and national level, alongside a set of recommendations specifically for agroforestry policy development in England.
Original languageEnglish
Article number106936
Number of pages12
JournalLand Use Policy
Volume134
Early online date15 Oct 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2023

Bibliographical note

This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Funding

Despite this apparent lack of applied agroecological knowledge in policy, the EU is funding research into this area. Part of the funding topic \u2018Strengthening the European agro-ecological research and innovation ecosystem\u2019, two, multi-year, multi-million-euro research projects are currently underway. The projects \u201CAgroecology for Europe\u201D (AE4EU, Grant Agreement n. 101000478) and \u201CThe European Agroecology Living Lab and Research Infrastructure Network\u201D (ALL-Ready, Grant Agreement n. 101000349), nested within the Horizon 2020 research and innovation funding programme, both aim to strengthen agroecological research and facilitate a transition to more sustainable farming systems. Additionally, the Standing Committee on Agricultural Research (SCAR), named agroecology as a key priority in the SCAR 2019 plenary, specifically in response to the climate agenda and UN SDGs, recognising the need for a more sustainable agriculture. SCAR-AE, the new strategic working group on agroecology, formally came into being on the 1st January 2021, with the aim to \u201Csupport research policy development for Agroecology at national EU and international levels, and fostering debate and providing conceptual, methodological and practical frameworks on agroecology\u2026\u201D ( Standing Committee on Agricultural Research ). Despite not being a policy document (and hence not part of this review), SCAR-AE\u2019s mission documents and terms of reference, are predominantly focussed on productivity, with little discussion or inclusion of the socio-economic aspects of agroecology. Seemingly agroecology does appear in policy fora and documents and this could be recognised by some as progress towards more sustainable food systems. However, the nature through which knowledge is integrated in the policies reviewed, is not robust, and arguably, does not go far enough to bring about the systemic changes needed in our food systems. As such, this review finds little evidence to suggest effective information flow exists between policy makers and those in the field, and whether key work produced within academia and civil society ends up reflected in critical policy documents. This highlights therefore, the need for an increased level of communication between agroecology advocates and policy makers and vice versa. Levidow. This research was made possible thanks to the Horizon 2020 Grant Agreement no. 862993, AGROMIX. Project AGROMIX delivers participatory research to drive the transition towards resilient farming and efficient land use in Europe. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

FundersFunder number
Horizon Europe862993

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 2 - Zero Hunger
      SDG 2 Zero Hunger
    2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
      SDG 13 Climate Action
    3. SDG 15 - Life on Land
      SDG 15 Life on Land

    Keywords

    • Agroecology
    • Agroforestry
    • Policy development
    • Food system

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Agroforestry policy development in England: a question of knowledge transference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this