Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 106936 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Land Use Policy |
| Volume | 134 |
| Early online date | 15 Oct 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2023 |
Bibliographical note
This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Funding
Despite this apparent lack of applied agroecological knowledge in policy, the EU is funding research into this area. Part of the funding topic \u2018Strengthening the European agro-ecological research and innovation ecosystem\u2019, two, multi-year, multi-million-euro research projects are currently underway. The projects \u201CAgroecology for Europe\u201D (AE4EU, Grant Agreement n. 101000478) and \u201CThe European Agroecology Living Lab and Research Infrastructure Network\u201D (ALL-Ready, Grant Agreement n. 101000349), nested within the Horizon 2020 research and innovation funding programme, both aim to strengthen agroecological research and facilitate a transition to more sustainable farming systems. Additionally, the Standing Committee on Agricultural Research (SCAR), named agroecology as a key priority in the SCAR 2019 plenary, specifically in response to the climate agenda and UN SDGs, recognising the need for a more sustainable agriculture. SCAR-AE, the new strategic working group on agroecology, formally came into being on the 1st January 2021, with the aim to \u201Csupport research policy development for Agroecology at national EU and international levels, and fostering debate and providing conceptual, methodological and practical frameworks on agroecology\u2026\u201D ( Standing Committee on Agricultural Research ). Despite not being a policy document (and hence not part of this review), SCAR-AE\u2019s mission documents and terms of reference, are predominantly focussed on productivity, with little discussion or inclusion of the socio-economic aspects of agroecology. Seemingly agroecology does appear in policy fora and documents and this could be recognised by some as progress towards more sustainable food systems. However, the nature through which knowledge is integrated in the policies reviewed, is not robust, and arguably, does not go far enough to bring about the systemic changes needed in our food systems. As such, this review finds little evidence to suggest effective information flow exists between policy makers and those in the field, and whether key work produced within academia and civil society ends up reflected in critical policy documents. This highlights therefore, the need for an increased level of communication between agroecology advocates and policy makers and vice versa. Levidow. This research was made possible thanks to the Horizon 2020 Grant Agreement no. 862993, AGROMIX. Project AGROMIX delivers participatory research to drive the transition towards resilient farming and efficient land use in Europe. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Horizon Europe | 862993 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 2 Zero Hunger
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Keywords
- Agroecology
- Agroforestry
- Policy development
- Food system
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Agroforestry policy development in England: a question of knowledge transference'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS