Agroecological research: conforming - or transforming the dominant agro-food regime?

L. Levidow, Michel Pimbert, G. Vanloqueren

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    180 Citations (Scopus)
    1046 Downloads (Pure)


    Agroecology has three practical forms—a scientific discipline, an agricultural practice, and a social movement. Their integration has provided a collective-action mode for contesting the dominant agro-food regime and creating alternatives, especially through a linkage with food sovereignty. At the same time, agroecology has been recently adopted by some actors who also promote conventional agriculture. Agroecology can play different roles—either conforming to the dominant regime, or else helping to transform it—contingent on specific empowerment strategies. Tensions between “conform versus transform” roles can be identified in European agroecological research, especially in three areas: farm-level agroecosystems development; participatory plant breeding; and short food-supply chains remunerating agroecological methods. To play a transformative role, collaborative strategies need to go beyond the linear stereotype whereby scientists “transfer” technology or farmers “apply” scientific research results. To the extent that farmer–scientist alliances co-create and exchange knowledge, such gains can transform the research system.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1127-1155
    JournalAgroecology and Sustainable Food Systems
    Issue number10
    Early online date29 Sept 2014
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Bibliographical note

    This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems on 17 October 2014, available online:


    • agrarian-based rural development
    • agroecology
    • farmer participation
    • knowledge exchange
    • research
    • transformation


    Dive into the research topics of 'Agroecological research: conforming - or transforming the dominant agro-food regime?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this