Aggressive complaining on Social Media: The case of #MuckyMerton

  • Dimitra Vladimirou
  • , Juliane House
  • , Dániel Z. Kádár

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    780 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This paper examines the ways in which the speech act of complaint is realised in social media contexts. To date, little attention has been devoted to the realisation of this speech act in online settings, despite the fact that such settings provide different affordances for complaining than many of their spoken and written counterparts. In the current study, we aim to make a step towards filling this knowledge gap by demonstrating that in online settings – in particular, social media – complaining can become very intensive and aggressive. This is because social media operates with features such as complex participation and multimodality, which allow users to reflect on each other's complaints in an increasingly aggressive escalatory manner, especially when these users are united by a joint cause. We deploy the concepts of ‘addressivity’ and ‘diachronicity’ to conceptualise those features of social media that boost complaint to become aggressive. As a case study, we investigate an online protest against the waste management policy of the Borough of Merton in London.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)51-64
    Number of pages14
    JournalJournal of Pragmatics
    Volume177
    Early online date3 Mar 2021
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - May 2021

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2021 Elsevier B.V.

    Copyright:
    Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

    Keywords

    • Addressivity
    • Aggression
    • Diachronicity
    • Online complaints
    • Twitter

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Language and Linguistics
    • Linguistics and Language
    • Artificial Intelligence

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Aggressive complaining on Social Media: The case of #MuckyMerton'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this