Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment

Brian Leung, Nuria Roura-Pascual, Sven Bacher, Jaakko Heikkilä, Lluis Brotons, Mark A. Burgman, Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz, Franz Essl, Philip E. Hulme, David M. Richardson, Daniel Sol, Montserrat Vilà

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We address criticism that the Transport, Establishment, Abundance, Spread, Impact (TEASI) framework does not facilitate objective mapping of risk assessment methods nor defines best practice. We explain why TEASI is appropriate for mapping, despite inherent challenges, and how TEASI offers considerations for best practices, rather than suggesting one best practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1415-e6
JournalEcology Letters
Volume16
Issue number11
Early online date23 Aug 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

risk assessment process
invasive species
risk assessment
assessment method

Keywords

  • Colonisation
  • Exotic
  • Habitat suitability
  • Life history trait
  • Non-indigenous
  • Policy
  • Propagule pressure
  • Risk analysis
  • Species distribution
  • Uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Leung, B., Roura-Pascual, N., Bacher, S., Heikkilä, J., Brotons, L., Burgman, M. A., ... Vilà, M. (2013). Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment. Ecology Letters, 16(11), 1415-e6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12172

Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment. / Leung, Brian; Roura-Pascual, Nuria; Bacher, Sven; Heikkilä, Jaakko; Brotons, Lluis; Burgman, Mark A.; Dehnen-Schmutz, Katharina; Essl, Franz; Hulme, Philip E.; Richardson, David M.; Sol, Daniel; Vilà, Montserrat.

In: Ecology Letters, Vol. 16, No. 11, 11.2013, p. 1415-e6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Leung, B, Roura-Pascual, N, Bacher, S, Heikkilä, J, Brotons, L, Burgman, MA, Dehnen-Schmutz, K, Essl, F, Hulme, PE, Richardson, DM, Sol, D & Vilà, M 2013, 'Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment' Ecology Letters, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1415-e6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12172
Leung B, Roura-Pascual N, Bacher S, Heikkilä J, Brotons L, Burgman MA et al. Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment. Ecology Letters. 2013 Nov;16(11):1415-e6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12172
Leung, Brian ; Roura-Pascual, Nuria ; Bacher, Sven ; Heikkilä, Jaakko ; Brotons, Lluis ; Burgman, Mark A. ; Dehnen-Schmutz, Katharina ; Essl, Franz ; Hulme, Philip E. ; Richardson, David M. ; Sol, Daniel ; Vilà, Montserrat. / Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment. In: Ecology Letters. 2013 ; Vol. 16, No. 11. pp. 1415-e6.
@article{d0721a3e7c25451c9eaa63d2d8f51c7f,
title = "Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment",
abstract = "We address criticism that the Transport, Establishment, Abundance, Spread, Impact (TEASI) framework does not facilitate objective mapping of risk assessment methods nor defines best practice. We explain why TEASI is appropriate for mapping, despite inherent challenges, and how TEASI offers considerations for best practices, rather than suggesting one best practice.",
keywords = "Colonisation, Exotic, Habitat suitability, Life history trait, Non-indigenous, Policy, Propagule pressure, Risk analysis, Species distribution, Uncertainty",
author = "Brian Leung and Nuria Roura-Pascual and Sven Bacher and Jaakko Heikkil{\"a} and Lluis Brotons and Burgman, {Mark A.} and Katharina Dehnen-Schmutz and Franz Essl and Hulme, {Philip E.} and Richardson, {David M.} and Daniel Sol and Montserrat Vil{\`a}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/ele.12172",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "1415--e6",
journal = "Ecology Letters",
issn = "1461-023X",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Addressing a critique of the TEASI framework for invasive species risk assessment

AU - Leung, Brian

AU - Roura-Pascual, Nuria

AU - Bacher, Sven

AU - Heikkilä, Jaakko

AU - Brotons, Lluis

AU - Burgman, Mark A.

AU - Dehnen-Schmutz, Katharina

AU - Essl, Franz

AU - Hulme, Philip E.

AU - Richardson, David M.

AU - Sol, Daniel

AU - Vilà, Montserrat

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - We address criticism that the Transport, Establishment, Abundance, Spread, Impact (TEASI) framework does not facilitate objective mapping of risk assessment methods nor defines best practice. We explain why TEASI is appropriate for mapping, despite inherent challenges, and how TEASI offers considerations for best practices, rather than suggesting one best practice.

AB - We address criticism that the Transport, Establishment, Abundance, Spread, Impact (TEASI) framework does not facilitate objective mapping of risk assessment methods nor defines best practice. We explain why TEASI is appropriate for mapping, despite inherent challenges, and how TEASI offers considerations for best practices, rather than suggesting one best practice.

KW - Colonisation

KW - Exotic

KW - Habitat suitability

KW - Life history trait

KW - Non-indigenous

KW - Policy

KW - Propagule pressure

KW - Risk analysis

KW - Species distribution

KW - Uncertainty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885953369&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ele.12172

DO - 10.1111/ele.12172

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 1415-e6

JO - Ecology Letters

JF - Ecology Letters

SN - 1461-023X

IS - 11

ER -