Achievement goals, competition appraisals, and the well- and ill-being of elite youth soccer players over two competitive seasons

James W. Adie, J.L. Duda, N. Ntoumanis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)
92 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Grounded in the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework (Elliot & McGregor, 2001), the purpose of this study was to investigate the temporal relationships between achievement goals, competition appraisals and indices of psychological and emotional welfare among elite adolescent soccer players. A subsidiary aim was to ascertain the mediational role of competition appraisals in explaining the potential achievement goal and well-/ill-being relationships. Ninety-one boys (mean age = 13.82 years) involved in an elite soccer program completed multisection questionnaires capturing the targeted variables. Measures were obtained on five occasions across two competitive seasons. Multilevel regression analyses revealed that MAp goals positively, and MAv goals negatively, predicted within-person changes in well-being over two seasons. PAp goal adoption was positively associated to within-person changes in negative affect. PAv goals corresponded negatively to between-person mean differences in positive affect. The results of the indirect effects showed challenge appraisals accounted for within-person associations between a MAp goal focus and well- and ill-being over time. The present findings provide only partial support for the utility of the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework in predicting young athletes’ psychological and emotional functioning in an elite youth sport setting.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)555-579
JournalJournal of Sport and Exercise Psychology
Volume32
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Soccer
Psychology
Multilevel Analysis
Athletes
Regression Analysis

Bibliographical note

Please note James Adie was working at the University of Birmingham at the time of publication.

Keywords

  • 2x2 achievement goal framework
  • stress
  • optimal functioning
  • multilevel regression
  • longitudinal design
  • youth sport

Cite this

Achievement goals, competition appraisals, and the well- and ill-being of elite youth soccer players over two competitive seasons. / Adie, James W.; Duda, J.L.; Ntoumanis, N.

In: Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2010, p. 555-579.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{96c87eaa39ac41fe853a25430f5fa0ed,
title = "Achievement goals, competition appraisals, and the well- and ill-being of elite youth soccer players over two competitive seasons",
abstract = "Grounded in the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework (Elliot & McGregor, 2001), the purpose of this study was to investigate the temporal relationships between achievement goals, competition appraisals and indices of psychological and emotional welfare among elite adolescent soccer players. A subsidiary aim was to ascertain the mediational role of competition appraisals in explaining the potential achievement goal and well-/ill-being relationships. Ninety-one boys (mean age = 13.82 years) involved in an elite soccer program completed multisection questionnaires capturing the targeted variables. Measures were obtained on five occasions across two competitive seasons. Multilevel regression analyses revealed that MAp goals positively, and MAv goals negatively, predicted within-person changes in well-being over two seasons. PAp goal adoption was positively associated to within-person changes in negative affect. PAv goals corresponded negatively to between-person mean differences in positive affect. The results of the indirect effects showed challenge appraisals accounted for within-person associations between a MAp goal focus and well- and ill-being over time. The present findings provide only partial support for the utility of the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework in predicting young athletes’ psychological and emotional functioning in an elite youth sport setting.",
keywords = "2x2 achievement goal framework, stress, optimal functioning, multilevel regression, longitudinal design, youth sport",
author = "Adie, {James W.} and J.L. Duda and N. Ntoumanis",
note = "Please note James Adie was working at the University of Birmingham at the time of publication.",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "555--579",
journal = "Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology",
issn = "0895-2779",
publisher = "Human Kinetics",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Achievement goals, competition appraisals, and the well- and ill-being of elite youth soccer players over two competitive seasons

AU - Adie, James W.

AU - Duda, J.L.

AU - Ntoumanis, N.

N1 - Please note James Adie was working at the University of Birmingham at the time of publication.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Grounded in the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework (Elliot & McGregor, 2001), the purpose of this study was to investigate the temporal relationships between achievement goals, competition appraisals and indices of psychological and emotional welfare among elite adolescent soccer players. A subsidiary aim was to ascertain the mediational role of competition appraisals in explaining the potential achievement goal and well-/ill-being relationships. Ninety-one boys (mean age = 13.82 years) involved in an elite soccer program completed multisection questionnaires capturing the targeted variables. Measures were obtained on five occasions across two competitive seasons. Multilevel regression analyses revealed that MAp goals positively, and MAv goals negatively, predicted within-person changes in well-being over two seasons. PAp goal adoption was positively associated to within-person changes in negative affect. PAv goals corresponded negatively to between-person mean differences in positive affect. The results of the indirect effects showed challenge appraisals accounted for within-person associations between a MAp goal focus and well- and ill-being over time. The present findings provide only partial support for the utility of the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework in predicting young athletes’ psychological and emotional functioning in an elite youth sport setting.

AB - Grounded in the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework (Elliot & McGregor, 2001), the purpose of this study was to investigate the temporal relationships between achievement goals, competition appraisals and indices of psychological and emotional welfare among elite adolescent soccer players. A subsidiary aim was to ascertain the mediational role of competition appraisals in explaining the potential achievement goal and well-/ill-being relationships. Ninety-one boys (mean age = 13.82 years) involved in an elite soccer program completed multisection questionnaires capturing the targeted variables. Measures were obtained on five occasions across two competitive seasons. Multilevel regression analyses revealed that MAp goals positively, and MAv goals negatively, predicted within-person changes in well-being over two seasons. PAp goal adoption was positively associated to within-person changes in negative affect. PAv goals corresponded negatively to between-person mean differences in positive affect. The results of the indirect effects showed challenge appraisals accounted for within-person associations between a MAp goal focus and well- and ill-being over time. The present findings provide only partial support for the utility of the 2 × 2 achievement goal framework in predicting young athletes’ psychological and emotional functioning in an elite youth sport setting.

KW - 2x2 achievement goal framework

KW - stress

KW - optimal functioning

KW - multilevel regression

KW - longitudinal design

KW - youth sport

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 555

EP - 579

JO - Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

JF - Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

SN - 0895-2779

IS - 4

ER -