Accounting Research: Relevance Lost

Andrew Higson, Rasha Kassem

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

For research to have an impact, it has to exist in the first place. Moves in the UK to link University funding to research activity have reinforced the importance of research to academia - however, this may also have had adverse consequences. It is now very difficult for qualified accountants to obtain teaching and research positions at UK universities because of the lack of a research background. Institutional pressures on those conducting research may also have resulted in dysfunctional behaviour regarding the nature of the work conducted and the output. In the 1960s there was an attempt to make accounting research more "scientific", however, this seems to resulted in the emphasis on research methodology rather than the importance of making a contribution to knowledge. The lack of emphasis on the reliability (the reproducibility of the results) and validity (whether you are testing what you think you are testing) of statistical findings merely appears to have resulted in the application of pseudoscience to accounting research. All these factors appear to have combined to bring into question the relevance of the accounting research produced.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-76
Number of pages18
JournalFinancial Reporting: Journal of Financial Communication
Volume2016
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

lack
funding
university
methodology
Teaching

Cite this

Accounting Research: Relevance Lost. / Higson, Andrew; Kassem, Rasha.

In: Financial Reporting: Journal of Financial Communication, Vol. 2016, No. 1, 01.11.2016, p. 59-76.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{85874ecc4549473896fa134115cdd55c,
title = "Accounting Research: Relevance Lost",
abstract = "For research to have an impact, it has to exist in the first place. Moves in the UK to link University funding to research activity have reinforced the importance of research to academia - however, this may also have had adverse consequences. It is now very difficult for qualified accountants to obtain teaching and research positions at UK universities because of the lack of a research background. Institutional pressures on those conducting research may also have resulted in dysfunctional behaviour regarding the nature of the work conducted and the output. In the 1960s there was an attempt to make accounting research more {"}scientific{"}, however, this seems to resulted in the emphasis on research methodology rather than the importance of making a contribution to knowledge. The lack of emphasis on the reliability (the reproducibility of the results) and validity (whether you are testing what you think you are testing) of statistical findings merely appears to have resulted in the application of pseudoscience to accounting research. All these factors appear to have combined to bring into question the relevance of the accounting research produced.",
author = "Andrew Higson and Rasha Kassem",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3280/FR2016-001004",
language = "English",
volume = "2016",
pages = "59--76",
journal = "Financial Reporting: Journal of Financial Communication",
issn = "2036-671X",
publisher = "IFAF Business School",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accounting Research: Relevance Lost

AU - Higson, Andrew

AU - Kassem, Rasha

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - For research to have an impact, it has to exist in the first place. Moves in the UK to link University funding to research activity have reinforced the importance of research to academia - however, this may also have had adverse consequences. It is now very difficult for qualified accountants to obtain teaching and research positions at UK universities because of the lack of a research background. Institutional pressures on those conducting research may also have resulted in dysfunctional behaviour regarding the nature of the work conducted and the output. In the 1960s there was an attempt to make accounting research more "scientific", however, this seems to resulted in the emphasis on research methodology rather than the importance of making a contribution to knowledge. The lack of emphasis on the reliability (the reproducibility of the results) and validity (whether you are testing what you think you are testing) of statistical findings merely appears to have resulted in the application of pseudoscience to accounting research. All these factors appear to have combined to bring into question the relevance of the accounting research produced.

AB - For research to have an impact, it has to exist in the first place. Moves in the UK to link University funding to research activity have reinforced the importance of research to academia - however, this may also have had adverse consequences. It is now very difficult for qualified accountants to obtain teaching and research positions at UK universities because of the lack of a research background. Institutional pressures on those conducting research may also have resulted in dysfunctional behaviour regarding the nature of the work conducted and the output. In the 1960s there was an attempt to make accounting research more "scientific", however, this seems to resulted in the emphasis on research methodology rather than the importance of making a contribution to knowledge. The lack of emphasis on the reliability (the reproducibility of the results) and validity (whether you are testing what you think you are testing) of statistical findings merely appears to have resulted in the application of pseudoscience to accounting research. All these factors appear to have combined to bring into question the relevance of the accounting research produced.

U2 - 10.3280/FR2016-001004

DO - 10.3280/FR2016-001004

M3 - Article

VL - 2016

SP - 59

EP - 76

JO - Financial Reporting: Journal of Financial Communication

JF - Financial Reporting: Journal of Financial Communication

SN - 2036-671X

IS - 1

ER -