Accommodation of couch constraints for coplanar intensity modulated radiation therapy

Jurgen Meyer, John A. Mills, Olivier C.L. Haas, Keith J. Burnham, Elizabeth M. Parvin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Three treatment couches, henceforth referred to as the standard, the variable standard and the C-arm couch, each based on a different supporting frame system, were investigated for their suitability for the delivery of a high number of coplanar beams (≥5) as may be required for intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments. Materials and methods: A number of equispaced beam arrangements (five to nine) were examined in combination with two circular target sizes (∅6 and ∅10 cm) at different locations within an elliptical body on the investigated couches, resulting in 70 different plans per couch. A rule based advisory system determined possible intersections of the beam paths with the supporting frames of the respective treatment couch and suggested a suitable constellation for the supporting frames. In cases of intersection, a beam–couch collision was eliminated by minimal rotation of the beams from the initial equispaced beam arrangement. To investigate the effect of a rotation of the posterior-oblique beams for five, seven and nine initially equispaced beams by an angle of 10°, a prostate plan was generated and compared with equispaced beam arrangement. Results: Initial beam paths intersected with the standard couch in 63% of the plans, necessitating a rotation of one or two beams. It was necessary to modify the beam angles in 34% of the cases on the variable standard couch to avoid an intersection of the beams with the couch. All the plans would have been delivered satisfactorily on the C-arm couch without a rotation of beams. Simulation studies showed that the dose distribution for a prostate treatment could be affected significantly, but not detrimentally, by the rotation of the two posterior-oblique beam orientations by an angle of 10°.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-32
JournalRadiotherapy and Oncology
Volume61
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2001

Fingerprint

Radiotherapy
Prostate
Therapeutics

Bibliographical note

This paper is not yet available on the repository

Keywords

  • Intensity-modulated radiotherapy
  • Treatment couch
  • Beam–couch intersection
  • Equispaced beam angles
  • Coplanar

Cite this

Accommodation of couch constraints for coplanar intensity modulated radiation therapy. / Meyer, Jurgen; Mills, John A.; Haas, Olivier C.L.; Burnham, Keith J.; Parvin, Elizabeth M.

In: Radiotherapy and Oncology, Vol. 61, No. 1, 10.2001, p. 23-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Meyer, Jurgen ; Mills, John A. ; Haas, Olivier C.L. ; Burnham, Keith J. ; Parvin, Elizabeth M. / Accommodation of couch constraints for coplanar intensity modulated radiation therapy. In: Radiotherapy and Oncology. 2001 ; Vol. 61, No. 1. pp. 23-32.
@article{3a161f77a8bc4638a6a5c1cb41f9518b,
title = "Accommodation of couch constraints for coplanar intensity modulated radiation therapy",
abstract = "Purpose: Three treatment couches, henceforth referred to as the standard, the variable standard and the C-arm couch, each based on a different supporting frame system, were investigated for their suitability for the delivery of a high number of coplanar beams (≥5) as may be required for intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments. Materials and methods: A number of equispaced beam arrangements (five to nine) were examined in combination with two circular target sizes (∅6 and ∅10 cm) at different locations within an elliptical body on the investigated couches, resulting in 70 different plans per couch. A rule based advisory system determined possible intersections of the beam paths with the supporting frames of the respective treatment couch and suggested a suitable constellation for the supporting frames. In cases of intersection, a beam–couch collision was eliminated by minimal rotation of the beams from the initial equispaced beam arrangement. To investigate the effect of a rotation of the posterior-oblique beams for five, seven and nine initially equispaced beams by an angle of 10°, a prostate plan was generated and compared with equispaced beam arrangement. Results: Initial beam paths intersected with the standard couch in 63{\%} of the plans, necessitating a rotation of one or two beams. It was necessary to modify the beam angles in 34{\%} of the cases on the variable standard couch to avoid an intersection of the beams with the couch. All the plans would have been delivered satisfactorily on the C-arm couch without a rotation of beams. Simulation studies showed that the dose distribution for a prostate treatment could be affected significantly, but not detrimentally, by the rotation of the two posterior-oblique beam orientations by an angle of 10°.",
keywords = "Intensity-modulated radiotherapy, Treatment couch, Beam–couch intersection, Equispaced beam angles, Coplanar",
author = "Jurgen Meyer and Mills, {John A.} and Haas, {Olivier C.L.} and Burnham, {Keith J.} and Parvin, {Elizabeth M.}",
note = "This paper is not yet available on the repository",
year = "2001",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00393-0",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "23--32",
journal = "Radiotherapy and Oncology",
issn = "0167-8140",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accommodation of couch constraints for coplanar intensity modulated radiation therapy

AU - Meyer, Jurgen

AU - Mills, John A.

AU - Haas, Olivier C.L.

AU - Burnham, Keith J.

AU - Parvin, Elizabeth M.

N1 - This paper is not yet available on the repository

PY - 2001/10

Y1 - 2001/10

N2 - Purpose: Three treatment couches, henceforth referred to as the standard, the variable standard and the C-arm couch, each based on a different supporting frame system, were investigated for their suitability for the delivery of a high number of coplanar beams (≥5) as may be required for intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments. Materials and methods: A number of equispaced beam arrangements (five to nine) were examined in combination with two circular target sizes (∅6 and ∅10 cm) at different locations within an elliptical body on the investigated couches, resulting in 70 different plans per couch. A rule based advisory system determined possible intersections of the beam paths with the supporting frames of the respective treatment couch and suggested a suitable constellation for the supporting frames. In cases of intersection, a beam–couch collision was eliminated by minimal rotation of the beams from the initial equispaced beam arrangement. To investigate the effect of a rotation of the posterior-oblique beams for five, seven and nine initially equispaced beams by an angle of 10°, a prostate plan was generated and compared with equispaced beam arrangement. Results: Initial beam paths intersected with the standard couch in 63% of the plans, necessitating a rotation of one or two beams. It was necessary to modify the beam angles in 34% of the cases on the variable standard couch to avoid an intersection of the beams with the couch. All the plans would have been delivered satisfactorily on the C-arm couch without a rotation of beams. Simulation studies showed that the dose distribution for a prostate treatment could be affected significantly, but not detrimentally, by the rotation of the two posterior-oblique beam orientations by an angle of 10°.

AB - Purpose: Three treatment couches, henceforth referred to as the standard, the variable standard and the C-arm couch, each based on a different supporting frame system, were investigated for their suitability for the delivery of a high number of coplanar beams (≥5) as may be required for intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatments. Materials and methods: A number of equispaced beam arrangements (five to nine) were examined in combination with two circular target sizes (∅6 and ∅10 cm) at different locations within an elliptical body on the investigated couches, resulting in 70 different plans per couch. A rule based advisory system determined possible intersections of the beam paths with the supporting frames of the respective treatment couch and suggested a suitable constellation for the supporting frames. In cases of intersection, a beam–couch collision was eliminated by minimal rotation of the beams from the initial equispaced beam arrangement. To investigate the effect of a rotation of the posterior-oblique beams for five, seven and nine initially equispaced beams by an angle of 10°, a prostate plan was generated and compared with equispaced beam arrangement. Results: Initial beam paths intersected with the standard couch in 63% of the plans, necessitating a rotation of one or two beams. It was necessary to modify the beam angles in 34% of the cases on the variable standard couch to avoid an intersection of the beams with the couch. All the plans would have been delivered satisfactorily on the C-arm couch without a rotation of beams. Simulation studies showed that the dose distribution for a prostate treatment could be affected significantly, but not detrimentally, by the rotation of the two posterior-oblique beam orientations by an angle of 10°.

KW - Intensity-modulated radiotherapy

KW - Treatment couch

KW - Beam–couch intersection

KW - Equispaced beam angles

KW - Coplanar

U2 - 10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00393-0

DO - 10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00393-0

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 23

EP - 32

JO - Radiotherapy and Oncology

JF - Radiotherapy and Oncology

SN - 0167-8140

IS - 1

ER -