Accommodating intolerant speech: the decision in Ngole v Sheffield University

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

This decision has reopened the debate concerning the extent to which religious and personal views that challenge equality and diversity can be voiced by individuals; particularly those who might owe some form of duty to promote equality and diversity. This piece examines the decision in the light of the conflict between free speech and the promotion of equality.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)108-113
Number of pages6
JournalCoventry Law Journal
Volume25
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 9 Jan 2021

Keywords

  • Free Speech
  • Diversity
  • universities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Accommodating intolerant speech: the decision in Ngole v Sheffield University'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this