Absent Agroecology Aid: On UK Agricultural Development Assistance Since 2010

Michel Pimbert, Nina Moeller

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    29 Citations (Scopus)
    120 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Using figures published by the UK Department of International Development (DFID), this study finds that despite overwhelming evidence in favour of agroecology as a mode of agricultural development able to address crucial aspects of the interrelated crises facing human societies, UK development aid barely supports agroecology. Based on the most generous interpretation, this study shows for the first time that aid for agroecological projects is less than 5% of agricultural aid and less than 0.5% of total UK aid budget since 2010. Since 1 January 2010, no funds at all have been directed at or been committed to projects with the main focus on development or promotion of agroecological practices. Minor funds have been directed at projects which include some activities promoting agroecology at the most basic level of resource efficiency (e.g., conservation agriculture). By largely supporting industrial and Green Revolution agriculture, UK Aid priorities contribute very little to the transition towards social-ecological sustainability in Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number505
    Number of pages10
    JournalSustainability
    Volume10
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 13 Feb 2018

    Bibliographical note

    This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

    Keywords

    • development aid priorities
    • agroecology
    • food and agricultural policy
    • Green Revolution agriculture
    • sustainable development goals (SDGs)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Absent Agroecology Aid: On UK Agricultural Development Assistance Since 2010'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this