Ableism as a regulator of social practice and disabled people's self-determination to participate in sport and physical activity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Building on the theories of ableism, social practice and self-determination, this article proposes a framework to aid explaining why disabled people (DP) are less likely to access and participate in sport and physical activity (S&PA). We argue that ableism acts as a regulatory mechanism for each of the elements (habitus, capital and field) and different forms of capital (social, cultural, economic and symbolic) of Bourdieu’s concept of social practice. In addition, we argue that this regulation of social practice also impacts the possibility for DP to self-determine their access to and participation in S&PA due to their perceived competence, autonomy and relatedness. In turn, we also acknowledge that ableism can impact directly upon self-determination and that social practice within the arena of S&PA may reinforce ableist perceptions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)(In-press)
JournalLeisure Studies
Volume(In-press)
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 14 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

self determination
physical activity
self-determination
sport
Sports
social capital
autonomy
relatedness
aid
economics
regulation
participation
Self-determination
Social practice
Disabled people
Physical activity

Keywords

  • Ableism
  • Disabled People
  • Social Practice
  • Social Capital
  • Self-Determination
  • Sport and Physical Activity

Cite this

@article{4ef53c187fbb4e27986dda7ee1011f4f,
title = "Ableism as a regulator of social practice and disabled people's self-determination to participate in sport and physical activity",
abstract = "Building on the theories of ableism, social practice and self-determination, this article proposes a framework to aid explaining why disabled people (DP) are less likely to access and participate in sport and physical activity (S&PA). We argue that ableism acts as a regulatory mechanism for each of the elements (habitus, capital and field) and different forms of capital (social, cultural, economic and symbolic) of Bourdieu’s concept of social practice. In addition, we argue that this regulation of social practice also impacts the possibility for DP to self-determine their access to and participation in S&PA due to their perceived competence, autonomy and relatedness. In turn, we also acknowledge that ableism can impact directly upon self-determination and that social practice within the arena of S&PA may reinforce ableist perceptions.",
keywords = "Ableism, Disabled People, Social Practice, Social Capital, Self-Determination, Sport and Physical Activity",
author = "Ian Brittain and Rui Biscaia and Simon Gerard",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1080/02614367.2019.1694569",
language = "English",
volume = "(In-press)",
pages = "(In--press)",
journal = "Leisure Studies",
issn = "0261-4367",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ableism as a regulator of social practice and disabled people's self-determination to participate in sport and physical activity

AU - Brittain, Ian

AU - Biscaia, Rui

AU - Gerard, Simon

PY - 2019/11/14

Y1 - 2019/11/14

N2 - Building on the theories of ableism, social practice and self-determination, this article proposes a framework to aid explaining why disabled people (DP) are less likely to access and participate in sport and physical activity (S&PA). We argue that ableism acts as a regulatory mechanism for each of the elements (habitus, capital and field) and different forms of capital (social, cultural, economic and symbolic) of Bourdieu’s concept of social practice. In addition, we argue that this regulation of social practice also impacts the possibility for DP to self-determine their access to and participation in S&PA due to their perceived competence, autonomy and relatedness. In turn, we also acknowledge that ableism can impact directly upon self-determination and that social practice within the arena of S&PA may reinforce ableist perceptions.

AB - Building on the theories of ableism, social practice and self-determination, this article proposes a framework to aid explaining why disabled people (DP) are less likely to access and participate in sport and physical activity (S&PA). We argue that ableism acts as a regulatory mechanism for each of the elements (habitus, capital and field) and different forms of capital (social, cultural, economic and symbolic) of Bourdieu’s concept of social practice. In addition, we argue that this regulation of social practice also impacts the possibility for DP to self-determine their access to and participation in S&PA due to their perceived competence, autonomy and relatedness. In turn, we also acknowledge that ableism can impact directly upon self-determination and that social practice within the arena of S&PA may reinforce ableist perceptions.

KW - Ableism

KW - Disabled People

KW - Social Practice

KW - Social Capital

KW - Self-Determination

KW - Sport and Physical Activity

U2 - 10.1080/02614367.2019.1694569

DO - 10.1080/02614367.2019.1694569

M3 - Article

VL - (In-press)

SP - (In-press)

JO - Leisure Studies

JF - Leisure Studies

SN - 0261-4367

ER -