A systematic survey of the quality of research reporting in general orthopaedic journals

N. R. Parsons, R. Hiskens, C. L. Price, J. Achten, M. L. Costa

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

50 Citations (Scopus)


The poor reporting and use of statistical methods in orthopaedic papers has been widely discussed by both clinicians and statisticians. A detailed review of research published in general orthopaedic journals was undertaken to assess the quality of experimental design, statistical analysis and reporting. A representative sample of 100 papers was assessed for compliance to CONSORT and STROBE guidelines and the quality of the statistical reporting was assessed using a validated questionnaire. Overall compliance with CONSORT and STROBE guidelines in our study was 59% and 58% respectively, with very few papers fulfilling all criteria. In 37% of papers patient numbers were inadequately reported; 20% of papers introduced new statistical methods in the 'results' section not previously reported in the 'methods' section, and 23% of papers reported no measurement of error with the main outcome measure. Taken together, these issues indicate a general lack of statistical rigour and are consistent with similar reviews undertaken in a number of other scientific and clinical research disciplines. It is imperative that the orthopaedic research community strives to improve the quality of reporting; a failure to do so could seriously limit the development of future research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1154-1159
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B
Volume93 B
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2011
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'A systematic survey of the quality of research reporting in general orthopaedic journals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this