A South African study comparing the effectiveness of computer-based learning materials and face-to-face teaching

Tasneem Joosub

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper compares the effectiveness of in-house developed computer-based learning
(CBL) materials with face-to-face teaching. Two groups of higher education students
were randomly assigned to complete tutorial work in one highly structured topic of
introductory accounting using either CBL materials (treatment group) or face-to-face
teaching (control group). The effectiveness of both approaches was measured according
to the students’ performance in a class test, in relation to their prior accounting
knowledge and gender. The results showed that the students with no prior accounting
knowledge who completed the CBL materials achieved a significantly higher test mark
than the face-to-face teaching group. However, there was no significant difference in the
marks of the students with prior accounting knowledge, and there was no difference on
the basis of gender. The results of this South African study correspond to results in
existing literature in other countries, and contribute to the overall knowledge of the
effectiveness of CBL materials with respect to prior accounting knowledge and gender.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-37
Number of pages15
JournalMeditari Accounting Research
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Teaching
learning
gender
Group
student
performance
education
literature

Keywords

  • Computer-based learning (CBL)
  • Face-to-face teaching
  • Student performance
  • Accounting education
  • Prior accounting experience
  • Gender

Cite this

A South African study comparing the effectiveness of computer-based learning materials and face-to-face teaching. / Joosub, Tasneem.

In: Meditari Accounting Research , Vol. 18, No. 2, 2010, p. 23-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dbfafee972d7466798af1dbbab99e5e1,
title = "A South African study comparing the effectiveness of computer-based learning materials and face-to-face teaching",
abstract = "This paper compares the effectiveness of in-house developed computer-based learning(CBL) materials with face-to-face teaching. Two groups of higher education studentswere randomly assigned to complete tutorial work in one highly structured topic ofintroductory accounting using either CBL materials (treatment group) or face-to-faceteaching (control group). The effectiveness of both approaches was measured accordingto the students’ performance in a class test, in relation to their prior accountingknowledge and gender. The results showed that the students with no prior accountingknowledge who completed the CBL materials achieved a significantly higher test markthan the face-to-face teaching group. However, there was no significant difference in themarks of the students with prior accounting knowledge, and there was no difference onthe basis of gender. The results of this South African study correspond to results inexisting literature in other countries, and contribute to the overall knowledge of theeffectiveness of CBL materials with respect to prior accounting knowledge and gender.",
keywords = "Computer-based learning (CBL), Face-to-face teaching, Student performance, Accounting education, Prior accounting experience, Gender",
author = "Tasneem Joosub",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1108/10222529201000008",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "23--37",
journal = "Meditari Accounting Research",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A South African study comparing the effectiveness of computer-based learning materials and face-to-face teaching

AU - Joosub, Tasneem

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - This paper compares the effectiveness of in-house developed computer-based learning(CBL) materials with face-to-face teaching. Two groups of higher education studentswere randomly assigned to complete tutorial work in one highly structured topic ofintroductory accounting using either CBL materials (treatment group) or face-to-faceteaching (control group). The effectiveness of both approaches was measured accordingto the students’ performance in a class test, in relation to their prior accountingknowledge and gender. The results showed that the students with no prior accountingknowledge who completed the CBL materials achieved a significantly higher test markthan the face-to-face teaching group. However, there was no significant difference in themarks of the students with prior accounting knowledge, and there was no difference onthe basis of gender. The results of this South African study correspond to results inexisting literature in other countries, and contribute to the overall knowledge of theeffectiveness of CBL materials with respect to prior accounting knowledge and gender.

AB - This paper compares the effectiveness of in-house developed computer-based learning(CBL) materials with face-to-face teaching. Two groups of higher education studentswere randomly assigned to complete tutorial work in one highly structured topic ofintroductory accounting using either CBL materials (treatment group) or face-to-faceteaching (control group). The effectiveness of both approaches was measured accordingto the students’ performance in a class test, in relation to their prior accountingknowledge and gender. The results showed that the students with no prior accountingknowledge who completed the CBL materials achieved a significantly higher test markthan the face-to-face teaching group. However, there was no significant difference in themarks of the students with prior accounting knowledge, and there was no difference onthe basis of gender. The results of this South African study correspond to results inexisting literature in other countries, and contribute to the overall knowledge of theeffectiveness of CBL materials with respect to prior accounting knowledge and gender.

KW - Computer-based learning (CBL)

KW - Face-to-face teaching

KW - Student performance

KW - Accounting education

KW - Prior accounting experience

KW - Gender

U2 - 10.1108/10222529201000008

DO - 10.1108/10222529201000008

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 23

EP - 37

JO - Meditari Accounting Research

JF - Meditari Accounting Research

IS - 2

ER -