A new typology of modern atheisms: pilgrim atheism versus tourist atheism

Morteza Hashemi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper distinguishes between two types of modern atheisms: pilgrim atheism versus tourist atheism. Pilgrim atheism is based on and firmly supports the religion/science dichotomy. New Atheism is today’s well-known representative of pilgrim atheism which is characterised by its hostility to all religions. However, their very atheistic conception of the human being as a cognitively privileged animal depends on a theological conception of humanity, i.e. the human being is a God-like creature who can attain God’s objective knowledge. The second part of the paper is dedicated to exploring an emerging modern atheistic discourse: tourist atheism, emblematised by figures such as Alain de Botton. The fundamental argument of that part is that tourist atheists approach religion as a cultural heritage which still contains some benefits for non-believers. Thus, their strategy of approaching religions is not absolute rejection but engaging with them as repositories of useful sentiments, rituals, insights and ideas. Thus, tourist atheists do not hold the religion versus modernity dichotomy. The paper argues that tourist atheism, which has greater concerns for human subjectivity and internal pleasure of humans, is also an extension of another theological conception of humans as created in the image of God: humans who reproduce God’s autonomy and singularity.
Original languageEnglish
JournalCulture and Religion: An Interdisciplinary Journal
Volume(In Press)
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Mar 2016

Fingerprint

atheism
typology
tourist
Religion
god
human being
Tourists
Pilgrims
Atheism
cultural heritage
subjectivity
modernity
religious behavior
autonomy
animal
discourse
Deity
Conception
science

Bibliographical note

The full text is currently unavailable on the repository.

This article is currently in press. The full citation details will be uploaded when available.

Keywords

  • Atheism
  • theology
  • science
  • Dawkins
  • de Botton

Cite this

A new typology of modern atheisms: pilgrim atheism versus tourist atheism. / Hashemi, Morteza.

In: Culture and Religion: An Interdisciplinary Journal, Vol. (In Press), 30.03.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8279cc26a677418f80f8d323758aed26,
title = "A new typology of modern atheisms: pilgrim atheism versus tourist atheism",
abstract = "This paper distinguishes between two types of modern atheisms: pilgrim atheism versus tourist atheism. Pilgrim atheism is based on and firmly supports the religion/science dichotomy. New Atheism is today’s well-known representative of pilgrim atheism which is characterised by its hostility to all religions. However, their very atheistic conception of the human being as a cognitively privileged animal depends on a theological conception of humanity, i.e. the human being is a God-like creature who can attain God’s objective knowledge. The second part of the paper is dedicated to exploring an emerging modern atheistic discourse: tourist atheism, emblematised by figures such as Alain de Botton. The fundamental argument of that part is that tourist atheists approach religion as a cultural heritage which still contains some benefits for non-believers. Thus, their strategy of approaching religions is not absolute rejection but engaging with them as repositories of useful sentiments, rituals, insights and ideas. Thus, tourist atheists do not hold the religion versus modernity dichotomy. The paper argues that tourist atheism, which has greater concerns for human subjectivity and internal pleasure of humans, is also an extension of another theological conception of humans as created in the image of God: humans who reproduce God’s autonomy and singularity.",
keywords = "Atheism, theology, science, Dawkins, de Botton",
author = "Morteza Hashemi",
note = "The full text is currently unavailable on the repository. This article is currently in press. The full citation details will be uploaded when available.",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1080/14755610.2016.1165268",
language = "English",
volume = "(In Press)",
journal = "Culture and Religion",
issn = "1475-5610",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new typology of modern atheisms: pilgrim atheism versus tourist atheism

AU - Hashemi, Morteza

N1 - The full text is currently unavailable on the repository. This article is currently in press. The full citation details will be uploaded when available.

PY - 2016/3/30

Y1 - 2016/3/30

N2 - This paper distinguishes between two types of modern atheisms: pilgrim atheism versus tourist atheism. Pilgrim atheism is based on and firmly supports the religion/science dichotomy. New Atheism is today’s well-known representative of pilgrim atheism which is characterised by its hostility to all religions. However, their very atheistic conception of the human being as a cognitively privileged animal depends on a theological conception of humanity, i.e. the human being is a God-like creature who can attain God’s objective knowledge. The second part of the paper is dedicated to exploring an emerging modern atheistic discourse: tourist atheism, emblematised by figures such as Alain de Botton. The fundamental argument of that part is that tourist atheists approach religion as a cultural heritage which still contains some benefits for non-believers. Thus, their strategy of approaching religions is not absolute rejection but engaging with them as repositories of useful sentiments, rituals, insights and ideas. Thus, tourist atheists do not hold the religion versus modernity dichotomy. The paper argues that tourist atheism, which has greater concerns for human subjectivity and internal pleasure of humans, is also an extension of another theological conception of humans as created in the image of God: humans who reproduce God’s autonomy and singularity.

AB - This paper distinguishes between two types of modern atheisms: pilgrim atheism versus tourist atheism. Pilgrim atheism is based on and firmly supports the religion/science dichotomy. New Atheism is today’s well-known representative of pilgrim atheism which is characterised by its hostility to all religions. However, their very atheistic conception of the human being as a cognitively privileged animal depends on a theological conception of humanity, i.e. the human being is a God-like creature who can attain God’s objective knowledge. The second part of the paper is dedicated to exploring an emerging modern atheistic discourse: tourist atheism, emblematised by figures such as Alain de Botton. The fundamental argument of that part is that tourist atheists approach religion as a cultural heritage which still contains some benefits for non-believers. Thus, their strategy of approaching religions is not absolute rejection but engaging with them as repositories of useful sentiments, rituals, insights and ideas. Thus, tourist atheists do not hold the religion versus modernity dichotomy. The paper argues that tourist atheism, which has greater concerns for human subjectivity and internal pleasure of humans, is also an extension of another theological conception of humans as created in the image of God: humans who reproduce God’s autonomy and singularity.

KW - Atheism

KW - theology

KW - science

KW - Dawkins

KW - de Botton

U2 - 10.1080/14755610.2016.1165268

DO - 10.1080/14755610.2016.1165268

M3 - Article

VL - (In Press)

JO - Culture and Religion

JF - Culture and Religion

SN - 1475-5610

ER -