A Minimum Area Discrepancy Method (MADM) for Force Displacement Response Correlation

Jeremie Peres, Christophe Bastien, Jesper Christensen, Zarah Asgharpour

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

With the increasing use of Computer Aided Engineering, it has become vital to be able to evaluate the accuracy of numerical models. Specific methods such as CORA were developed to objectively evaluate the correlation between a physical test and a numerical simulation results in terms of parameter vs time. However, no metric has so far been developed for Force Vs Deflection (FvD) signals often used in crashworthiness and biomechanics. A unique method called the Minimum Area Discrepancy Method, or MADM, is proposed to address this deficiency. This new method initially calculates a parameter ‘R’ which represents the area between numerical model and the average physical test response and then divides it by the average area generated by the upper and lower test corridors, based on the same standard deviation. The parameter ‘R’ is then normalized between 0 (no correlation) and 1 (perfect correlation) to become the MADM correlation rating. The MADM method was then validated by comparing a one dimensional Finite Element (FE) model of a chest model, under 2 impact velocities, against reference Post Mortem Human Subject (PMHS) data. The MADM method was further used to improve the correlation of this thorax model, by varying model parameters and generating 81 model variations. Based on the MADM ratings, a set parameter values leading to the best fit was identified. The best fit exhibits a response significantly better than the original chest model. MADM is novel, unique, easy to use and fulfills an important gap in objectively evaluating FVD correlation responses.
LanguageEnglish
Article numberGCMB-2018-045
Pages981-996
Number of pages16
JournalComputer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
Volume22
Issue number11
Early online date10 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 10 May 2019

Fingerprint

Numerical models
Crashworthiness
Biomechanics
Correlation methods
Computer aided engineering
Computer simulation

Keywords

  • correlation
  • FvD
  • MADM
  • minimum area discrepancy method

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Bioengineering
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

A Minimum Area Discrepancy Method (MADM) for Force Displacement Response Correlation. / Peres, Jeremie; Bastien, Christophe; Christensen, Jesper; Asgharpour, Zarah.

In: Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 11, GCMB-2018-045, 18.08.2019, p. 981-996.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{255682c1c8fd4001b6959a1a6cac471e,
title = "A Minimum Area Discrepancy Method (MADM) for Force Displacement Response Correlation",
abstract = "With the increasing use of Computer Aided Engineering, it has become vital to be able to evaluate the accuracy of numerical models. Specific methods such as CORA were developed to objectively evaluate the correlation between a physical test and a numerical simulation results in terms of parameter vs time. However, no metric has so far been developed for Force Vs Deflection (FvD) signals often used in crashworthiness and biomechanics. A unique method called the Minimum Area Discrepancy Method, or MADM, is proposed to address this deficiency. This new method initially calculates a parameter ‘R’ which represents the area between numerical model and the average physical test response and then divides it by the average area generated by the upper and lower test corridors, based on the same standard deviation. The parameter ‘R’ is then normalized between 0 (no correlation) and 1 (perfect correlation) to become the MADM correlation rating. The MADM method was then validated by comparing a one dimensional Finite Element (FE) model of a chest model, under 2 impact velocities, against reference Post Mortem Human Subject (PMHS) data. The MADM method was further used to improve the correlation of this thorax model, by varying model parameters and generating 81 model variations. Based on the MADM ratings, a set parameter values leading to the best fit was identified. The best fit exhibits a response significantly better than the original chest model. MADM is novel, unique, easy to use and fulfills an important gap in objectively evaluating FVD correlation responses.",
keywords = "correlation, FvD, MADM, minimum area discrepancy method",
author = "Jeremie Peres and Christophe Bastien and Jesper Christensen and Zarah Asgharpour",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1080/10255842.2019.1610745",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "981--996",
journal = "Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering",
issn = "1025-5842",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Minimum Area Discrepancy Method (MADM) for Force Displacement Response Correlation

AU - Peres, Jeremie

AU - Bastien, Christophe

AU - Christensen, Jesper

AU - Asgharpour, Zarah

PY - 2019/5/10

Y1 - 2019/5/10

N2 - With the increasing use of Computer Aided Engineering, it has become vital to be able to evaluate the accuracy of numerical models. Specific methods such as CORA were developed to objectively evaluate the correlation between a physical test and a numerical simulation results in terms of parameter vs time. However, no metric has so far been developed for Force Vs Deflection (FvD) signals often used in crashworthiness and biomechanics. A unique method called the Minimum Area Discrepancy Method, or MADM, is proposed to address this deficiency. This new method initially calculates a parameter ‘R’ which represents the area between numerical model and the average physical test response and then divides it by the average area generated by the upper and lower test corridors, based on the same standard deviation. The parameter ‘R’ is then normalized between 0 (no correlation) and 1 (perfect correlation) to become the MADM correlation rating. The MADM method was then validated by comparing a one dimensional Finite Element (FE) model of a chest model, under 2 impact velocities, against reference Post Mortem Human Subject (PMHS) data. The MADM method was further used to improve the correlation of this thorax model, by varying model parameters and generating 81 model variations. Based on the MADM ratings, a set parameter values leading to the best fit was identified. The best fit exhibits a response significantly better than the original chest model. MADM is novel, unique, easy to use and fulfills an important gap in objectively evaluating FVD correlation responses.

AB - With the increasing use of Computer Aided Engineering, it has become vital to be able to evaluate the accuracy of numerical models. Specific methods such as CORA were developed to objectively evaluate the correlation between a physical test and a numerical simulation results in terms of parameter vs time. However, no metric has so far been developed for Force Vs Deflection (FvD) signals often used in crashworthiness and biomechanics. A unique method called the Minimum Area Discrepancy Method, or MADM, is proposed to address this deficiency. This new method initially calculates a parameter ‘R’ which represents the area between numerical model and the average physical test response and then divides it by the average area generated by the upper and lower test corridors, based on the same standard deviation. The parameter ‘R’ is then normalized between 0 (no correlation) and 1 (perfect correlation) to become the MADM correlation rating. The MADM method was then validated by comparing a one dimensional Finite Element (FE) model of a chest model, under 2 impact velocities, against reference Post Mortem Human Subject (PMHS) data. The MADM method was further used to improve the correlation of this thorax model, by varying model parameters and generating 81 model variations. Based on the MADM ratings, a set parameter values leading to the best fit was identified. The best fit exhibits a response significantly better than the original chest model. MADM is novel, unique, easy to use and fulfills an important gap in objectively evaluating FVD correlation responses.

KW - correlation

KW - FvD

KW - MADM

KW - minimum area discrepancy method

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065719313&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10255842.2019.1610745

DO - 10.1080/10255842.2019.1610745

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 981

EP - 996

JO - Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

T2 - Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

JF - Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering

SN - 1025-5842

IS - 11

M1 - GCMB-2018-045

ER -