Abstract
We investigate 833 reported estimates detailing the impact of external interventions aimed at alleviating civil war on conflict intensity. This investigation encompasses 34 studies conducted between 1996 and 2020, primarily focusing on African countries. While the average reported effect is both negative and statistically significant, our analysis reveals substantial divergence in the results. We apply meta-regression analysis to examine the sources of this heterogeneity. Our main findings are as follows. First, differences in data, intervention targets, conflict intensity measures, and the publication year of the primary studies account for the observed heterogeneity in reported estimates. Second, we find no evidence of publication selection bias that aligns with prior beliefs, theoretical expectations, or statistical significance. Third, after considering potential sources of heterogeneity and publication bias, the overall genuine effect of external intervention remains negative and statistically significant. This implies that external intervention efforts do mitigate conflict intensity, albeit with a small magnitude of the statistical significance coefficient. For policy purposes, external interventions are likely to have a modest effect.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | SAGE Open |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 13 Dec 2024 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
© The Author(s) 2024.Creative Commons License (CC BY 4.0)
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Funding
A preliminary version of this paper was presented at the 20th Jan Tinbergen European Peace Science Conference (2021) and at the Institute of Development and Policy Research, Addis Ababa University. Comments by participants are gratefully acknowledged. The author acknowledges the financial assistance of the Development Economics research group, International Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus University.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Erasmus University Rotterdam |
Keywords
- external intervention
- conflict intensity
- genuine underlying effect
- heterogeneity
- meta-analysis
