Abstract
Despite the increasing prevalence of artificial intelligence (AI) ethics frameworks, the practical application of these frameworks in industrial settings remains limited. This limitation is further augmented in energy systems by the complexity of systems composition and systems operation for energy generation, distribution, and supply. The primary reason for this limitation is the gap between the conceptual notion of ethics principles and the technical performance of AI applications in energy systems. For instance, trust is featured prominently in ethics frameworks but pertains to limited relevance for the robust operation of a smart grid. In this paper, we propose a lifecycle approach for AI ethics that aims to address this gap. The proposed approach consists of four phases: design, development, operation, and evaluation. All four phases are supported by a central AI ethics repository that gathers and integrates the primary and secondary dimensions of ethical practice, including reliability, safety, and trustworthiness, from design through to evaluation. This lifecycle approach is closely aligned with the operational lifecycle of energy systems, from design and production through to use, maintenance, repair, and overhaul, followed by shutdown, recycling, and replacement. Across these lifecycle stages, an energy system engages with numerous human stakeholders, directly with designers, engineers, users, trainers, operators, and maintenance technicians, as well as indirectly with managers, owners, policymakers, and community groups. This lifecycle approach is empirically evaluated in the complex energy system of a multi-campus tertiary education institution where the alignment between ethics and technical performance, as well as the human-centric application of AI, are demonstrated.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 3572 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Energies |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 14 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 20 Jul 2024 |
Bibliographical note
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Funder
This research was partially funded by the Australian Government’s Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water under the International Clean Innovation Researcher Networks (ICIRN) program grant number ICIRN000077.Funding
This research was partially funded by the Australian Government’s Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water under the International Clean Innovation Researcher Networks (ICIRN) program grant number ICIRN000077.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
International Clean Innovation Researcher Network | ICIRN000077 |
Keywords
- AI ethics
- responsible AI
- energy AI
- AI risks
- AI lifecycle
- energy systems
- implementation science